Here is a subversion diff to make use of the new bootargs.h header in pc98
cdboot and loader, and i386 cdboot and pxeldr:
http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/bootargs.diff
Could you please review it?
Thank you!
MFi386 of BTX changes for support of KARGS_FLAGS_EXTARG is pending.
Do you think that it sh
On 5/9/12 5:32 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> Here is a subversion diff to make use of the new bootargs.h header in pc98
> cdboot and loader, and i386 cdboot and pxeldr:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/bootargs.diff
> Could you please review it?
> Thank you!
Looks good.
> MFi386 of BTX changes for
Hi,
after a long time, I finaly got around trying to get the GSM/UMTS working,
but so far it thinks it's a mass storage!
ugen0.2: at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=FULL
(12Mbps) pwr=ON
bLength = 0x0012
bDescriptorType = 0x0001
bcdUSB = 0x0110
bDeviceClass = 0x
bDeviceSubClass = 0x0
On 5/9/2012 10:46 AM, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> Hi,
> after a long time, I finaly got around trying to get the GSM/UMTS working,
> but so far it thinks it's a mass storage!
>
> ugen0.2: at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=FULL
> (12Mbps) pwr=ON
>
> bLength = 0x0012
> bDescriptorType = 0x0001
> b
Hi Hackers,
I've been asked to write up a script to analyze tunables via kenv for
archival purposes an to establish a baseline set of static variables.
In order to make life easier (and be able to do all the grunt work in a
shell one-liner instead of introducing a bug prone tunable parser
.. re-run with witness? :)
Adrian
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Wed, 9 May 2012 09:05:47 -0700
Garrett Cooper wrote:
> Hi Hackers,
> I've been asked to write up a script to analyze tunables via kenv
> for archival purposes an to establish a baseline set of static
> variables. In order to make life easier (and be able to do all the
> grunt work in a she
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Wojciech Puchar
wrote:
> i tried nfsv4, tested under FreeBSD over localhost and it is roughly the
> same. am i doing something wrong?
I found NFSv4 to be much *slower* than NFSv3 on FreeBSD, when I
benchmarked it a year or so ago.
--
David Brodbeck
System Admin
Hi Aleksandr!
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Aleksandr Rybalko wrote:
> On Wed, 9 May 2012 09:05:47 -0700
> Garrett Cooper wrote:
...
> Hi Garret,
>
> I use it for embedded, kenv is good transport shared by loader, kernel
> and userland (since there is no RW storages).
Indeed.
> IMO, kenv !
I'm trying to use sysv style echo in /bin/csh and I've hit a wall as
to how to get it to work.
The following does not have the outcome that I'm looking for:
# echo_style=sysv
# echo test\ttest > test
# cat test
testttest
I want this:
# echo test\ttest > test
# cat test
testtest
Any thought
> On 5/9/2012 10:46 AM, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> > Hi,
> > after a long time, I finaly got around trying to get the GSM/UMTS working,
> > but so far it thinks it's a mass storage!
> >
> > ugen0.2: at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST
> > spd=FULL
> > (12Mbps) pwr=ON
> >
> > bLength = 0x0012
> > bDescr
11 matches
Mail list logo