Hi,
Here's a trace with powerd/sleep states disabled, but I haven't set
machdep.idle=spin. I'll try it with that in a sec.
http://people.freebsd.org/~adrian/ath/ktr-notaskq-1.out.gz
The entries are still out of whack in places, but it doesn't look like
it's necessarily due to out of sync TSCs..
Concerning your hint installing the systen on the second SSD of around
16 GByte (marketing GBytes :-)), the BIOS by itself is unable to boot
right. 16 billion bytes.
A simple marketing trick to cheat you for 7.6%
I think, it's only 7.3%
$ bc
(16*1024*1024*1024-160)/160*100
7.3
Hi,
I've re-run the test with powerd and sleep state stuff disabled - lo
and behold, UDP tests are now up around 240-250MBit, what I'd expect
for this 2 stream 11n device.
So why is it that I lose roughly 80MBit of throughput with powerd and
C2/C3 enabled, when there's plenty of CPU going around?
On Wed, 30 May 2012 12:17:07 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
Humm, can you test it with 2 CPUs?
We primarily only run with 1 CPU. We have seen it crash on multiple CPU
VMs. Also, Dane Foster appeared to have been using multiple CPUs in his
video transcoding VMs.
Unfortunately I can't give
On Wednesday, May 30, 2012 12:07:50 pm Mark Felder wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2012 10:06:13 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> >
> > Do you only have one CPU in this VM? If not, do you know which threads
> > the other CPUs were running (e.g. do you have ps7.png, etc.)?
>
> correct, only one CPU in the
Hi,
I have long running process for which `ps -o usertime -p $pid' shows
always the same time - 6190:07.65, `ps -o cputime -p $pid' for the same
process continue to grow and now it's 21538:53.61. It looks like
overflow in resource usage code or something.
Any ideas?
--
Andrey Zonov
___
El día Wednesday, May 30, 2012 a las 07:44:37PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar escribió:
> > Concerning your hint installing the systen on the second SSD of around
> > 16 GByte (marketing GBytes :-)), the BIOS by itself is unable to boot
> right. 16 billion bytes.
>
> A simple marketing trick to cheat yo
On Sat, 26 May 2012 22:45:37 +1200
Sam Lin wrote:
> Hi FreeBSD fellows,
>
> Those who are using LaTeX on FreeBSD must know that tetex has been
> discontinued years ago and that TeXLive is now recommended, however
> TeXLive has never been merged in the ports tree on FreeBSD and that
> tetex is s
...
# geli attach /dev/md1
Enter passphrase:
# dd if=/dev/md1.eli of=/dev/null bs=128k count=4k
536868864 bytes transferred in 35.093015 secs (15298454 bytes/sec)
# dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/md1.eli bs=128k count=4k
536868864 bytes transferred in 38.044995 secs (14111419 bytes/sec)
# geli detach /de
On Wed, 30 May 2012 10:06:13 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
Do you only have one CPU in this VM? If not, do you know which threads
the other CPUs were running (e.g. do you have ps7.png, etc.)?
correct, only one CPU in the VM
___
freebsd-hackers@freebs
On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 4:08:23 pm Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi Alexander and others,
>
> I've been tinkering with ath(4) IO scheduling and taskqueues. In order
> to get proper "in order" TX IO occuring, I've placed ath_start() into
> a taskqueue so now whenever ath_start() is called, it just schedul
On Thursday, May 24, 2012 9:47:46 am Mark Felder wrote:
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 17:30:40 -0500, Adrian Chadd
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > can you please, -please- file a PR? And place all of the above
> > information in it so we don't lose it?
> >
>
> I'd be glad to post a PR and assist in helping
Mel,
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 02:54:06PM +0200, Mel Flynn wrote:
> On 28-5-2012 23:22, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> >
> > I'm not sure what you mean, but -fstack-protector is documented in GCC
> > documentation, I suppose it's the same for Clang but I didn't check.
> > You can disable it on FreeBSD by
13 matches
Mail list logo
