Re: [CFT/RFC]: refactor bsd.prog.mk to understand multiple programs instead of a singular program

2012-10-04 Thread George Neville-Neil
On Oct 2, 2012, at 10:37 , John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote: This is very non-obvious to the public at large (e.g. there was no public response to one group's inquiry about the second ATF import for example). Also, given that you had no idea that sgf@ and obrien@ were working on

Re: [CFT/RFC]: refactor bsd.prog.mk to understand multiple programs instead of a singular program

2012-10-04 Thread David Wolfskill
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 12:11:21PM -0400, George Neville-Neil wrote: ... But, I would like to drive this to a solution on arch@. We don't have an atf@, but we do have a test@ and testing@. We have too many mailing lists already, so let's finish this up here if we can and then continue

Re: Fwd: [CFT/RFC]: refactor bsd.prog.mk to understand multiple programs instead of a singular program

2012-10-04 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 7:37 AM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote: On Tuesday, October 02, 2012 10:29:49 am Garrett Cooper wrote: On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 4:50 AM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote: ... This sounds like a superior approach. It doesn't break any current use cases while

Re: [CFT/RFC]: refactor bsd.prog.mk to understand multiple programs instead of a singular program

2012-10-04 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 9:29 AM, David Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org wrote: On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 12:11:21PM -0400, George Neville-Neil wrote: ... But, I would like to drive this to a solution on arch@. We don't have an atf@, but we do have a test@ and testing@. We have too many mailing

No bus_space_read_8 on x86 ?

2012-10-04 Thread Carl Delsey
I noticed that the bus_space_*_8 functions are unimplemented for x86. Looking at the code, it seems this is intentional. Is this done because on 32-bit systems we don't know, in the general case, whether to read the upper or lower 32-bits first? If that's the reason, I was thinking we could

Re: Fwd: [CFT/RFC]: refactor bsd.prog.mk to understand multiple programs instead of a singular program

2012-10-04 Thread Simon J. Gerraty
On Thu, 4 Oct 2012 09:42:29 -0700, Garrett Cooper writes: I'd like to know what all is being contributed back from Juniper in terms of tests, ATF integration into the build system (which I've given back to marcel@/gnn@, but We aim to contribute build improvments, and integration of ATF was part

Re: vendor import questions

2012-10-04 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 08:41:34AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: On Monday, September 24, 2012 5:31:37 pm Brooks Davis wrote: As part of switching to NetBSD's mtree I plan to import their versions of a few files that are part of libc (for example all the bits of vis/unvis). I would like to do