On 8.3-RELEASE I've hit a deadlock with kldstat.
I can't provide much information as procstat(1) locks up and I have
already rebooted the servers due to it breaking quite a bit in my setup.
> # kldstat
> Id Refs AddressSize Name
> load: 0.91 cmd: kldstat 9936 [kernel linker] 51.21r 0.00u
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
> I've been working on removing obsolete information various documents.
> While going through older articles I noticed a few references to the
> "old style" kernel configuration involving running config(1) manually.
>
> Is there any value in keep
On Nov 22, 2012, at 12:27 PM, Chris Rees wrote:
>
> On 22 Nov 2012 18:56, "Wojciech Puchar"
> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> How is it simpler?
> >>
> >> Chris
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > strange question i thought it is obviously clear.
> >
> > $EDITOR config
> > config
> > cd ../compile/
> > make depend
> >
I was only confused because you had asserted that six commands was
simpler-- Now you point out that you don't keep a src tree, paired with
freebsd-update it is be a good combination for custom kernels :)
Thank you for clarifying.
this is not a discussion.
__
On 22 Nov 2012 18:56, "Wojciech Puchar"
wrote:
>>
>>
>> How is it simpler?
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>
>>
> strange question i thought it is obviously clear.
>
> $EDITOR config
> config
> cd ../compile/
> make depend
> make
> make install
>
>
> that's all. and no need to keep whole /usr/src, just sys
>
> w
How is it simpler?
Chris
strange question i thought it is obviously clear.
$EDITOR config
config
cd ../compile/
make depend
make
make install
that's all. and no need to keep whole /usr/src, just sys
what is wrong in it?
___
freebsd-hackers@fre
On 22 Nov 2012 16:26, "Wojciech Puchar"
wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Value: ability to embed entire config (comments and all) into the kernel
>
>
> value 2: simplicity.
>
How is it simpler?
Chris
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebs
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:35:57AM -0500, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
> > I've been working on removing obsolete information various documents.
> > While going through older articles I noticed a few references to the
> > "old style" kernel configu
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
> I've been working on removing obsolete information various documents.
> While going through older articles I noticed a few references to the
> "old style" kernel configuration involving running config(1) manually.
>
> Is there any value in keep
Value: ability to embed entire config (comments and all) into the kernel
value 2: simplicity.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-un
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012, Eitan Adler wrote:
I've been working on removing obsolete information various documents.
While going through older articles I noticed a few references to the
"old style" kernel configuration involving running config(1) manually.
Is there any value in keeping this document
On Fri, 16 Nov 2012, Mark Saad wrote:
The install config
I created /conf/ada-install.cfg and /conf/da-install.cfg the only
difference here is the name of the disk as that is not auto
discovered.
Here is ada-install.cfg
# User Generated pc-sysinstall configuration
inst
12 matches
Mail list logo
