The following patches (for head and stable/9) automatically enable
CLANG_IS_CC if GCC is disabled but CLANG is not. Any objections?
Index: head/share/mk/bsd.own.mk
===
--- head/share/mk/bsd.own.mk(revision 246325)
+++
On 2013-02-13 12:48, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: The following patches (for
head and stable/9) automatically enable
CLANG_IS_CC if GCC is disabled but CLANG is not. Any objections?
This looks fine to me. Otherwise, if ${CC} isn't set to clang,
buildworld might fail in mysterious ways... :)
Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org writes:
Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no writes:
The following patches (for head and stable/9) automatically enables
CLANG_IS_CC if GCC is disabled but CLANG is not. Any objections?
This looks fine to me. Otherwise, if ${CC} isn't set to clang,
buildworld
On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 22:34 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 09:03:39AM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 12:37 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 02:47:06PM +0100, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 05:58:30PM
Hello,
I am porting an application which maps files into the memory and works directly
with the memory. When doing this, it can happen that when someone resizes the
file so that part of the previously mapped region is no longer backed by the
file, synchronous signal is sent to the process which
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:18 AM, nat...@centrum.cz wrote:
Hello,
I am porting an application which maps files into the memory and works
directly with the memory. When doing this, it can happen that when someone
resizes the file so that part of the previously mapped region is no longer
when doing lots of writes (large file) after few tens of gigabytes i've
got as below.
smartctl -t long (full surface test) reports no errors
my disk is
ada0 at ahcich0 bus 0 scbus0 target 0 lun 0
ada0: SAMSUNG HD154UI 1AG01118 ATA-7 SATA 2.x device
ada0: 300.000MB/s transfers (SATA 2.x,
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:13:58PM -0500, Ryan Stone wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:18 AM, nat...@centrum.cz wrote:
Hello,
I am porting an application which maps files into the memory and works
directly with the memory. When doing this, it can happen that when someone
resizes the
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 08:16:32AM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 22:34 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 09:03:39AM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 12:37 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 02:47:06PM +0100,
... why don't we just mark tsleep() as a barrier point and be done with it?
Same as the wakeup call?
Adrian
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
on 04/02/2013 21:58 John Baldwin said the following:
You can also load modules manually by
using the add-kld command (give it a full path to an individual module). You
may need to use 'nosharedlibrary' to unload symbols from the wrong module
before add-kld will be useful however.
I think
On 2/12/2013 10:20 AM, Kevin Day wrote:
I'm not sure if this is the right place to post this, so if you know of anyone
who may be interested in this please forward to them. Right now my company
(your.org) does the free amd64/i386 VMs for FreeBSD developers.
For an unrelated project, we're
On Feb 13, 2013, at 3:53 PM, Joshua Isom jri...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/12/2013 10:20 AM, Kevin Day wrote:
I'm not sure if this is the right place to post this, so if you know of
anyone who may be interested in this please forward to them. Right now my
company (your.org) does the free
13 matches
Mail list logo
