Re: attaching iscsi (or ggate) disk before mounting root

2013-02-26 Thread Wojciech Puchar
thank you very much. i solved that problem other way, finally ending in NFS root. but i still need raw block device as swap device, which will (rarely) be in active use. What do you recommend - iscsi or geom_gate. the latter is 100 times more simple, and i like simple solutions. but

Re: [patch] Wine DLL base address patches

2013-02-26 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 5:19 AM, Damjan Jovanovic damjan@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:57:45AM +0200, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Tijl Coosemans t...@coosemans.org

Re: [patch] Wine DLL base address patches

2013-02-26 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 11:35 PM, Jeremie Le Hen j...@freebsd.org wrote: Hi Damjan, On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 05:29:01PM +0200, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: Wine needs some of its libraries to be loaded at specific base addresses (https://wiki.freebsd.org/Wine), something FreeBSD currently lacks.

Re: intr_event_handle never sends EOI if we fail to schedule ithread

2013-02-26 Thread John Baldwin
On Thursday, February 21, 2013 5:10:44 pm Ryan Stone wrote: I recently saw an issue where all interrupts from a particular interrupt vector were never raised. After investigating it appears that I ran into the bug fixed in r239095[1], where an interrupt handler that uses an ithread was added

Re: rtprio_thread trouble

2013-02-26 Thread John Baldwin
On Friday, February 22, 2013 2:06:00 pm Ian Lepore wrote: I ran into some trouble with rtprio_thread() today. I have a worker thread that I want to run at idle priority most of the time, but if it falls too far behind I'd like to bump it back up to regular timeshare priority until it catches

Re: why no per-thread scheduling niceness?

2013-02-26 Thread John Baldwin
On Friday, February 22, 2013 2:12:54 pm Ian Lepore wrote: I'm curious why the concept of scheduling niceness applies only to an entire process, and it's not possible to have nice threads within a process. Is there any fundamental reason why it couldn't be supported with some extra bookkeeping

Re: [patch] Wine DLL base address patches

2013-02-26 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 10:52:15PM +0200, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 5:19 AM, Damjan Jovanovic damjan@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:57:45AM +0200, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: