RE: lots of network interfaces

I decided to stress-test the netgraph(4) subsystem one day and was able to create 65530 interfaces before it produced an error, refusing to create another. At that point, the system was still usable, but... It took over an hour for ifconfig to list all the interfaces. Simply typing "ifconfig" wit

Re: lots of network interfaces

On 7 March 2013 03:24, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > are there any scalability limits in case of lots of network interfaces. > i am asking for ca 800 tun(4) interfaces active but no more than 250Mbit/s > over them total. Do you hit CPU limits at that point? Adrian __

Re: pop filters from kqueue

On 05.03.13 17:53, Alfred Perlstein wrote: Alfred, > I'm not sure if kqueue support this, however adding such a facility > might be OK. thanks for your reply. What would be the correct place to suggest such a change? > The only pain here is that it requires managing a doubly linked list and > a

dtrace -c patch

$ dtrace -n 'blah blah' -c 'touch /' dtrace: failed to control pid 16473: process exited with status 0 I think that we need the following change: --- a/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libdtrace/common/dt_open.c +++ b/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libdtrace/common/dt_open.c @@ -1115,7 +1115,7 @@ allo

lots of network interfaces

are there any scalability limits in case of lots of network interfaces. i am asking for ca 800 tun(4) interfaces active but no more than 250Mbit/s over them total. ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/

Re: gjournal +UFS - anyone actually use it?

Interesting I will have to try this; can you post the exact test steps . Also what type of controller were you using and what kernel / version . intel atom D525 builtin ahci0: port 0x20b8-0x20bf,0x20cc-0x20cf,0x20b0-0x20b7,0x20c8-0x20cb,0x20a0-0x20af mem 0xf0284000-0xf02843ff irq 18 at dev