On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 02:38:20PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Am 23.03.2011 10:13, schrieb Alexey Shuvaev:
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:39:44AM -0500, Zhihao Yuan wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm a Computer Science student at Northern Illinois Unive
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:39:44AM -0500, Zhihao Yuan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm a Computer Science student at Northern Illinois University, and I
> used FreeBSD for a long time. I'm interested in the idea that to
> improve the nvi in the base system. My proposal is slightly different:
> I want to fork
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 07:01:23PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2010-11-08 16:34, Alexey Shuvaev wrote:
> >Just FYI, you would see exact the same problem if you try to compile
> >i386 world on amd64-CURRENT with clang:
> >...
> >/src/lib/csu/i386-elf/crt1_s.S: Asse
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 02:48:11PM +0100, Emanuel Haupt wrote:
> Warren Block wrote:
> > About a month ago, ccache began to pause in buildworld. The build
> > doesn't halt or quit, it stays running but not doing anything:
> >
[snip]
> >
> > This is on 8-stable as of today, i386. The -march=pr
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 10:45:37AM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 15:07 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> > Hi Hackers,
> > I realize this is a trivial patch, but it's a minor item that I
> > found kind of fascinating (and not thoroughly documented elsewhere
> > because many exam
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 01:18:18PM -0700, Yuri wrote:
> VirtualBox kernel module (port emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod) began
> to cause system freezes from some kernel change around the end of
> January.
> Once the system freezes it has to be rebooted. Soundcard, if it was
> playing something, begin
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 01:47:11AM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:27 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> >
> >> So what I did was I wrote up a patch to be *I know... here it comes*
> >> more like GNU coreutils' copy of mktemp.
> >
> >
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 03:56:35PM -0600, Peter Steele wrote:
> >> How do I get libc built with full debug symbols?
> >
> >I haven't tried it by myself but think here is the way to go: put the
> >following to /etc/make.conf and recompile needed libraries / ports.
> >WITH_DEBUG=yes
> >DEBUG_FLAGS=
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:17:50PM -0600, Peter Steele wrote:
> >You're going to need a debug version of libc, too.
> >gdb won't be able to find a backtrace out of a libc function without it.
>
> What's the proper way to build a debug version of libc and the other
> libraries? I tried this:
>
> e
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 03:52:33PM +0200, Max Boyarov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Who could help understand this:
>
> `--> cat 1.c
> int
> main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> return 0;
> }
>
> [snip]
>
> (gdb) set args test
> (gdb) b main
> Breakpoint 1 at 0x80483d0: file 1.c, line 3.
> (gdb) r
> St
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:09:46AM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> Hi hackers,
> I'm trying to get my Genuine 386 running 7.2. It currently runs 4.11.
> 386 was first base of FreeBSD, a shame to lose it.
> So far I've hacked diffs as below + the normal
> /etc/make.conf CFLAGS += -march=i386
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 03:40:54AM -0700, Brian Somers wrote:
> I recently closed bin/137647 and had second thoughts after Ivan (the
> originator) challenged my reason for closing it.
>
> The suggestion is that ps's -w switch is a strange artifact that can
> be safely deprecated. ps goes to great
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:43:20AM +0200, Alexander Best wrote:
> hi there,
>
> i've written an app in c (and a bit of asm) which needs to do raw parallel
> port io using the i386 opcodes in/out. to get the number of available parallel
> ports installed and their addresses i open and mmap /dev/mem
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:12:34AM -0700, Peter Steele wrote:
> Is it possible to determine the number of open files per process? We
> want to monitor this via a separate process and issue an alarm if some
> threshold is crossed.
>
procstat -f
___
freeb
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 11:28:02AM -0700, Yuri wrote:
> When I run cycle process: main() {for (;;) {}} I never see that it
> consumes ~100% CPU.
> Instead 'top -C' shows something like this, with numbers fluctuating
> around the shown numbers:
>
>
> CPU: 96.2% user, 0.0% nice, 20.0% system, 0
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 07:46:55PM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 06:24:11PM +0200, Alexey Shuvaev wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 04:02:19PM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote:
> > >
> > > after addressing Simon's concerns here's a ne
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 04:02:19PM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:21:26AM +0200, Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
> > Hey Roman,
> >
> > Roman Divacky wrote:
> > >I made this patch that highlights today in cal/ncal just like gnu
> > >cal does..
> > >
> > > www.vlakno.cz
17 matches
Mail list logo
