On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 1:06 AM, Mike Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 6 Aug 2008 22:34:51 -0400
Michael B Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As for getting rid of rc.d scripts, yes they're decrepit and I would
love to see them go but they're simple and third party software may
depend
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 7:14 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To who it may concern,
I am A FreeBSD administrator as well as a Solaris Administrator. I use
BSD at home but Solaris at work. I love both OS's but I would like to
increase the administrative capability of FreeBSD.
In Solaris 10
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:58 AM, Jilles Tjoelker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 07:11:26PM -0400, Michael B Allen wrote:
Below is a semtimedop(2) implementation that I'm using for FreeBSD. I
was hoping someone could look it over and tell me if they think the
implementation
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 10:05 AM, John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 12 July 2008 07:11:26 pm Michael B Allen wrote:
Hi,
Below is a semtimedop(2) implementation that I'm using for FreeBSD. I
was hoping someone could look it over and tell me if they think the
implementation
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 8:15 PM, John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 17 July 2008 01:42:31 pm Michael B Allen wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 10:05 AM, John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 12 July 2008 07:11:26 pm Michael B Allen wrote:
Hi,
Below is a semtimedop
Hi,
Below is a semtimedop(2) implementation that I'm using for FreeBSD. I
was hoping someone could look it over and tell me if they think the
implementation is sound.
The code seems to work ok but when stressing the FreeBSD build of my app
I have managed to provoke errors related to concurrency
On 7/13/08, Mikko Työläjärvi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Michael B Allen wrote:
Hi,
Below is a semtimedop(2) implementation that I'm using for FreeBSD. I
was hoping someone could look it over and tell me if they think the
implementation is sound.
The code seems
Hi,
Below is a semtimedop(2) implementation that I'm using for FreeBSD. I
was hoping someone could look it over and tell me if they think the
implementation is sound.
The code seems to work ok but when stressing the FreeBSD build of my app
I have managed to provoke errors related to concurrency
Hi,
I need semtimedop(2). I'm thinking I can just do a semop with a SIGINT maybe.
Can someone suggest a good method for setting up a timer to deliver
the signal? What sort of timers does FreeBSD offer?
Thanks,
Mike
--
Michael B Allen
PHP Active Directory SPNEGO SSO
http://www.ioplex.com
On 11/1/07, Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 01:41:10PM -0400, Michael B Allen wrote:
I need semtimedop(2). I'm thinking I can just do a semop with a SIGINT maybe.
I presume you mean SIGALRM.
Can someone suggest a good method for setting up a timer to deliver
Hello,
How does one get the pid if a child process that has exited? On other
systems this is available in siginfo_t but si_pid seems to be 0. Is
that normal?
Mike
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
On 7/20/07, Michael B Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
How does one get the pid if a child process that has exited? On other
systems this is available in siginfo_t but si_pid seems to be 0. Is
that normal?
Nevermind. I see siginfo_t isn't portable. I'm using waitpid now.
Mike
Hello,
I'm looking for an example that uses kvm_getargv but from just
googling around I can't seem to find an example. Can someone give me a
pointer?
Actually what I'm *really* trying to do is port some code that invokes
GDB to do a backtrace and I need to give GDB the path to the
executable of
On 7/19/07, Michael B Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm looking for an example that uses kvm_getargv but from just
googling around I can't seem to find an example. Can someone give me a
pointer?
Actually what I'm *really* trying to do is port some code that invokes
GDB to do
Is there any way to get argv[0] for [a particular] process without being root?
After more digging I see sysctl seems to be the way to do this but can I get
the full path to the executable form kinfo_proc?
How does ps do this?
static const char *
getcmdline(pid_t pid)
{
static struct
here doesn't have this DVD I really say go get it. It's
got some good stuff in there and even a bit on the history of Multi user OSs.
-Allen
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
:
Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you watch Revolution OS, Linus points out that his main thing
for doing Linux was that he wanted something like he had used at
the university he was at and he says it was SunOS. Sun OS /
Solaris, are straight BSD.
SunOS 5.x was the OS
it was SunOS. Sun OS / Solaris, are straight BSD.
For info on where I get this, get the movie 20 years of Berkeley UNIX. I own
that and Revolution OS, Linus Loves BSD even though he's sometimes mis quoted
or even joking.
-Allen A Linux and BSD and BeOS user
that explains what to add.
-Allen
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and grab one of Free BSD,
VERY nice smooth pad. ;)
-Allen
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday 19 December 2005 04:34, Dirk GOUDERS wrote:
3. Full review and update of the install docs, handbook, FAQ, etc.
There are sections that are embarrassingly out of date (one section of
the handbook apparently states that we only support a single brand of
wifi cards). A co-worker
On 12/17/2005 01:34:09 AM, Avleen Vig wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 10:40:22AM -0500, Martin Cracauer wrote:
2. SMP kernels for install. Right now we only install a UP
kernel, for
performance reasons. We should be able to package both a UP and
SMP
kernel into the release bits, and have
On Saturday 17 December 2005 03:55, Christian Brueffer wrote:
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 08:55:00AM +, Allen wrote:
On 12/17/2005 01:34:09 AM, Avleen Vig wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 10:40:22AM -0500, Martin Cracauer wrote:
2. SMP kernels for install. Right now we only install a UP
Hi hackers,
I am interested in connecting my Linux machine to my windows XP machine.
I was going to try the USB ports first. Now I've opened a can of worms.
Assuming one could buy a USB A-male to A-male cable, is there a danger in
connecting
each computer directly? Where can
would be the implications of creating a 512 MB swap partition
and mounting an MFS /tmp?
Thanks,
Allen
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
em at
http://www.freeBSD.org/handbook/internals-vm.html that includes
some info on tuning, but it doesn't mention what to do with /tmp.
So what's the bottom line? Should I leave /tmp on the root file
system, create a dedicated partition for /tmp, or mount the
swap partition on /tmp using the MFS?
Than
From http://www.yourvote.com/pci/
Rockwell Semiconductor Systems
714-221-4600
Vendor ID: 0x127A
Short Name: Rockwell Semi
Contact: [EMAIL
to know the vendor id of a
company that's no longer paying dues, you have to look at the
unofficial list maintained by Jim Boemler at
http://www.yourvote.com/pci/.
Allen
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
confuse them, it's an additional thing that they have
to keep in mind when writing portable software. I think we should be
working in the other direction--reducing the differences between the
systems and making it easier to write portable software. Maybe that's
just me, though... ;-)
-allen
29 matches
Mail list logo
