On 2009-05-15 14:48, Marius Nünnerich wrote:
Anybody knows good tools how to investigate this?
Valgrind?
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
On 2008-09-03 14:31, Matthias Apitz wrote:
from time to time at home I encounter that it is associating with an
unknown AP of my neighbourhood:
how this is possible and how can I prevent this?
Try to get wpa_supplicant log. Also you are welcome to write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mail list
On Tuesday 01 November 2005 18:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4. I sure ain't going to wear a T-shirt with that on it.
sad story - i'm too...
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To
I have doubts it will works:
- item = bucket-ub_bucket[--bucket-ub_cnt];
-1bbe: 66 ff 49 08 decw 0x8(%ecx)
-1bc2: 0f bf 41 08 movswl 0x8(%ecx),%eax
-1bc6: 8b 44 81 14 mov0x14(%ecx,%eax,4),%eax
-1bca: 89 45 f0 mov
I ran ministat against your tests with 1000 sockets loop and there isn't a
lot
of difference in the user times:
it was not supposed to be (the difference in the user times)
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
On Thursday 30 June 2005 10:35 am, Andriy Tkachuk wrote:
I just checked the object code - you right, it almost the same:
- bucket-ub_bucket[bucket-ub_cnt] = item;
-22b9: 0f bf 43 08 movswl 0x8(%ebx),%eax
-22bd: 8b 4d 0c mov0xc(%ebp),%ecx
-22c0
if one will decide to commit first optimization (about buckets),
then there must some adjustments be made also
regarding correct statistics gathering.
It seems that all is fine with statistics,
i mistook.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing
I just checked the object code - you right, it almost the same:
- bucket-ub_bucket[bucket-ub_cnt] = item;
-22b9: 0f bf 43 08 movswl 0x8(%ebx),%eax
-22bd: 8b 4d 0c mov0xc(%ebp),%ecx
-22c0: 89 4c 83 0c mov%ecx,0xc(%ebx,%eax,4)
-
On Saturday 04 June 2005 17:58, Matt Emmerton wrote:
The first line is the average since the system was last booted; all other
lines are instantaneous.
yeap. from man page:
-c Repeat the display count times. The first display is for the
time since a reboot and each
I've had the same problem on 5.3.
now on my FreeBSD 5.4-RC2 #0: Fri Apr 15 11:28:48 EEST 2005 i386
it seems that problem gone.
On Sunday 17 April 2005 00:07, c0ldbyte wrote:
On Sat, 16 Apr 2005, M. Parsons wrote:
I have a ext2 linux partition mounted under /linux via the fstab line:
If you're interested, I can send you a copy of the code... It's a bare
implementation with some basic regression tests performed It doesn't
layer ontop of kmem_cache though...
Yes, John. Send me please.
Thank you,
Andriy.
___
(exept patching [2005/01/26] threads/76690threads fork hang in child
for (-lc_r -lthr)
in wich anyone doesn't interesting as it appeared ))
PRs can get lost or misfiled... it's just human nature.
threads PRs are broadcasted every moth AFAIN )
___
Hi folks.
I wander how O(1) sheduling works in ULE.
In ule.pdf Jeff wrote:
Threads are picked from the current queue in
priority order until the current queue is empty.
As far as I understand the algorithm is O(n)
where n - number of READY TO RUN processes,
not all processes isn't it?
thanks,
Hi folks.
I wander how O(1) sheduling works in ULE.
In ule.pdf Jeff wrote:
Threads are picked from the current queue in
priority order until the current queue is empty.
As far as I understand the algorithm is O(n)
where n - number of READY TO RUN processes,
not all processes isn't it?
thanks,
I haven't looked at it, but could it just be referring to retrieving a
thread from the queue. Just pulling something off a queue is a O(1)
operation. The order it places things in the queue probably is not. :)
You rihgt - just pulling something off a queue is a O(1) operation,
but before
It is interesting why threre is no answer for this question so long time,
regardless that it was posted 2 times :)
For me it is also interesting to get the answer for this question
since from time to time i also confused by such msgs on
shutdown.
syncing disks... 54 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Gentlemen, is this theme for this list?
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi folks.
I noticed the strange stick of pthreads (amount ~ 500)
when allocating dynamic memory by malloc or new
in my system:
uname -a
FreeBSD ant.emict.com 5.3-STABLE FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE #0: Wed Feb 9 17:30:11 EET
2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/lin/fbsd_obj/usr/src/sys/ANT i386
It's
15:46, Coleman Kane wrote:
Could you post the code too, perchance?
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:55:04 +0200, Andriy Tkachuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks.
I noticed the strange stick of pthreads (amount ~ 500)
when allocating dynamic memory by malloc or new
in my system:
uname
maybe the reason you didn't receive any answer about your
problem till now is that you choose the wrong list for your problem
the right one is probably -questions
anyway: you probably lost the partiotion table as well as mbr.
if your filesystems didn't reformatted or erased - all is fine,
you
And AFAICS, there's no way to tell ls: first sort on time,
then on filename, then on size, etc. This would make a nice addition
though. :)
But there is nice sort command and power of unix.
Don't you remember the initial UNIX concept to make miracles by small
things fired together? :)
21 matches
Mail list logo
