I guess I'm late to the party (catching up on the whole thread took a
while...)
On Mon, 7 Oct 2013, Eitan Adler wrote:
patch(1) explicitly tries to use RCS (and SCCS) in certain cases. Are
we okay with a base system utility that behaves differently depending
on whether a port is installed?
On Wed, 10 Apr 2013, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
How do your tests work? Do you examine PTEs directly to check for
superpages
or are you relying on the vm.pmap.pde sysctls?
the later.
anyway - algorithm described on list - that heuristics detects consecutive
page access doesn't really help the
On Sun, 7 Apr 2013, Sebastian Feld wrote:
Does FreeBSD support multiple page sizes in a single userland process
like Solaris 11 does?
Superpage promotion happens automatically when consecutive data are
accessed according to the proper heuristic. As promotion is dynamic,
necessarily a
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012, Ed Maste wrote:
On 26 November 2012 01:21, Sushanth Rai sushanth_...@yahoo.com wrote:
Basically I would like to get kernel backtrace of a bunch of threads
from the live kernel under some conditions. When the condition is seen
I would like to run kgdb, collect kernel
On Wed, 14 Nov 2012, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 14 November 2012 11:32, Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote:
On Tue, 13 Nov 2012, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
if (len (2*NBG))
- errx(1, database too small: %s, db);
+ errx(1, database too small: %s\nRun
/usr/libexec
On Tue, 13 Nov 2012, Eitan Adler wrote:
Ack to all. Final patch sent for approval:
diff --git a/usr.bin/locate/locate/locate.c b/usr.bin/locate/locate/locate.c
index b0faefb..95b3fed 100644
--- a/usr.bin/locate/locate/locate.c
+++ b/usr.bin/locate/locate/locate.c
@@ -292,7 +292,7 @@
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2012-Oct-31 12:58:18 -0700, Alfred Perlstein bri...@mu.org wrote:
It seems like the new compiler likes to get up to ~200+MB resident when
building some basic things in our tree.
The killer I found was the ctfmerge(1) on the kernel - which exceeds
On Sat, 15 Sep 2012, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
I have been applying this diff to my man fdisk:
http://berklix.com/~jhs/src/bsd/fixes/FreeBSD/src/gen/sbin/fdisk/
*** 8.0-RELEASE/src/sbin/fdisk/fdisk.8 Sat Mar 14 22:32:16 2009
--- new-generic/src/sbin/fdisk/fdisk.8 Sat Mar 14 22:35:10 2009
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012, Fabian Keil wrote:
I'm using the following modification of Sean's patch:
diff --git a/sys/modules/dtrace/dtraceall/dtraceall.c
b/sys/modules/dtrace/dtraceall/dtraceall.c
index c57f590..d50b1e5 100644
--- a/sys/modules/dtrace/dtraceall/dtraceall.c
+++
On Mon, 2 Jul 2012, David Wolfskill wrote:
Huh??!?
At least as far back as 06 Jan (based on the mtime of /etc/src.conf), I
had set up src.conf to read:
PORTS_MODULES=x11/nvidia-driver
Don't do that.
PORTS_MODULES is documented to belong in make.conf, not src.conf.
That said, dougb has
On Mon, 2 Jul 2012, Doug Barton wrote:
On 07/02/2012 09:25, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jul 2012, David Wolfskill wrote:
Huh??!?
At least as far back as 06 Jan (based on the mtime of /etc/src.conf), I
had set up src.conf to read:
PORTS_MODULES=x11/nvidia-driver
Don't do
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
the reason was most probably of of date vbox and fuse kernel modules.
after making everything in sync system boots successfully with WITNESS,
INVARIANT etc. options enabled.
STILL - mostly at booting i'm getting few messages.
first comes when
On Sun, 3 Jun 2012, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 11:34:21PM +, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
Hi all,
This caused me to take a look at the namecache functions and find not very
much documentation of their use. I see that NetBSD has had a namecache.9
man page since 2001 [2
Hi all,
My colleague recently pointed out to me that I was calling vgone() when I
probably wanted to be using cache_purge() (as is done for implementations
of this OS-specific function in other BSDs [1]).
This caused me to take a look at the namecache functions and find not very
much
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012, rank1see...@gmail.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 13:41:56 +
Subject: Re: BUG: REL 9.0 - MD malloc of custom sector size
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 14:01:39 +0100
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012, Ansar Mohammed wrote:
Going back on this topic, it seems that there are alot of things that
are being shipped with FreeBSD that I am not sure we need in the base
distribution.
Does anyone use portalfs?
Maybe not ... per http://wiki.freebsd.org/NONMPSAFE_DEORBIT_VFS it is
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012, Ansar Mohammed wrote:
Hello All,
Is the port of Heimdal on FreeBSD being maintained? The version that
ships with 9.0 seems a bit old.
# /usr/libexec/kdc-v
kdc (Heimdal 1.1.0)
Copyright 1995-2008 Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan
Send bug-reports to heimdal-b...@h5l.org
My
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011, Alexander Best wrote:
On Mon Nov 21 11, Alexander Best wrote:
On Mon Nov 21 11, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote:
here's a revised patch.
...
+.Sh CAVEATS
+If the
+.Fn lseek
+system call
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote:
here's a revised patch.
...
+.Sh CAVEATS
+If the
+.Fn lseek
+system call is operating on a device, which is incapable of seeking,
+it will request the seek operation and complete successfully.
I
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011, Eitan Adler wrote:
I was playing around with WARNS on some programs and noticed that
usr.sbin/rtadvd builds with WARNS=3 with both clang and gcc (and
WARNS=6 with gcc). Perhaps the following could be committed ?
WARNS changes should be verified by make universe; was that
On Sat, 2 Jul 2011, Robert Millan wrote:
The userland aicasm utility in sys/dev/aic7xxx/aicasm/Makefile is being
built with -nostdinc -I/usr/include options. Unfortunately this breaks
building aicasm on systems using the upstream version of GCC, where
-nostdinc disables more search directories
On Sat, 2 Jul 2011, Robert Millan wrote:
My request is that FreeBSD also defines __FreeBSD_kernel__. If this
happens, life would be made a bit easier on both sides, as it'd be
% Index: contrib/gcc/config/freebsd-spec.h
% ===
%
AM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
After getting a few pointers from jhb at BSDCan on what a
bsd.kmod.mk-using Makefile should look like, I have been trying my hand
at porting the OpenAFS kernel module build system to use it. (The main
thing this gets us is not having to manually track version
On Sat, 4 Jun 2011, Ali Mashtizadeh wrote:
Hi Folks,
I'm working on a small geom filter where I need to open a file with
vn_open_cred, but this causes an assert because of a null pointer
because g_run_event proc structure has null pointer for the current
working directory.
Hi Ali,
In
After getting a few pointers from jhb at BSDCan on what a
bsd.kmod.mk-using Makefile should look like, I have been trying my hand at
porting the OpenAFS kernel module build system to use it. (The main thing
this gets us is not having to manually track version- and
architecture-dependent
On Tue, 17 May 2011, krad wrote:
On 17 May 2012 01:34, Mark Saad nones...@longcount.org wrote:
All
I am setting up 3 sun x4440 with freebsd 7.3 amd64 . The severs have 4x
4-core opterons and 128G of ram each . Once the servers boot they are a good
fit for what we are doing and preform well .
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Julien Laffaye wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Garrett Cooper gcoo...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
II. Package signing.
That would be really nice.
Right know we only planned to sign the repo
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, October 27, 2010 7:33:13 am Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
On 27 October 2010 10:23, Lars Hartmann l...@chaotika.org wrote:
The vgonel function isnt declarated in any header, the vgonel prototype
in vgone(9) isnt correct - found by Ben Kaduk
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:59:56AM -0400, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
[1] The old (racy) function is osi_TryEvictVCache, here:
http://git.openafs.org/?p=openafs.git;a=blob;f=src/afs/FBSD/osi_vcache.c;h=c2060c74f0155a610d2ea94f3c7f508e8ca4373a;hb=HEAD
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 03:28:36PM +0200, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
I'm wondering if this is necessary, or if this can possibly be turned
of with a knob somewhere.
Newer binutils got a flag after a discussion about this and related
issues in
On Sun, 29 Aug 2010, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 07:08:34PM -0400, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
[...]
building static egacy library
ar: fatal: Numeric user ID too large
*** Error code 70
This error appears to be coming from
lib/libarchive/archive_write_set_format_ar.c , which
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, September 16, 2010 1:33:07 pm Andrey Simonenko wrote:
The mtx_owned(9) macro uses this property, mtx_owned() does not use anything
special to compare the value of m-mtx_lock (volatile) with current thread
pointer, all other functions that
Hi all,
I've been working on fixing the OpenAFS network filesystem client for
FreeBSD, and it's at the point where I want to use the lazy man's
filesystem stress test: buildworld.
However, quite early in the process, I get the following error:
stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims
On Fri, 7 May 2010, Dmitry Krivenok wrote:
It looks like dev2unit is exactly what I need to fix compilation issue.
I changed the code of all modules as follows:
- int dev_num = minor(dev);
+ int dev_num = minor(dev2unit(dev));
and now it compiles and works well.
Is this the proper way of
Hi all,
In trying to track down an unrelated issue, I happened to
note that locking.9 needed a bit of help. They easy
changes went into docs/136918, but I am less confident
about my reading of the posix semaphore code.
Would anyone care to comment on the following?:
--- locking.9 2009-07-20
35 matches
Mail list logo
