On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 01:18:45PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bernd Walter writes:
No matter what disk you take - writes never have been atomic.
The major difference I see is that you get a read error back in
the disk failure case, while such a crypto
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 06:51:08PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], ALeine writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I gave up on journalling myself because IMO it complicates
things a lot and the problem it solves is very very small.
If only hardware manufacturers
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 03:41:01PM +0100, Peter B wrote:
Is it possible to program an ordinary (like Intel 82801CA/CAM (ICH3)) USB
host controller into acting as an usb device instead? (just like scsi can).
Idea:
M$Win-Usb - FreeBSD-USB#1 .. software .. FreeBSD-USB#2 - Device
No - this
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 09:00:58PM +0100, Peter B wrote:
Is it possible to program an ordinary (like Intel 82801CA/CAM (ICH3)) USB
host controller into acting as an usb device instead? (just like scsi can).
Idea:
M$Win-Usb - FreeBSD-USB#1 .. software .. FreeBSD-USB#2 - Device
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 09:30:43AM +0100, Christoph P. Kukulies wrote:
Just a question. Maybe it isn't true but to me it seems there
is still this duality between ttyd and cuad serial devices.
Why is that? I'm just asking because someone I was talking with
about modems an comm programs was
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 05:36:52PM +0100, Søren Schmidt wrote:
Seems I lost my lonely ATAPI CDROM with built in changer to the eternal
HW scrapyards, let it rest in peace :)
Finding a new one seems difficult so I thought I'd ask around how many
still has one of these ?
I ask because
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 08:00:08PM +0300, Andrew L. Neporada wrote:
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 09:35:16PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote:
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 01:42:46PM +0300, Andrew L. Neporada wrote:
On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 02:52:21PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
Chances are you don't
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 12:42:50PM -0500, Kurt J. Lidl wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 04:16:13PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 09:30:43AM +0100, Christoph P. Kukulies wrote:
Just a question. Maybe it isn't true but to me it seems there
is still this duality between
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 11:13:26AM -0800, Sam Leffler wrote:
Bernd Walter wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 12:42:50PM -0500, Kurt J. Lidl wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 04:16:13PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 09:30:43AM +0100, Christoph P. Kukulies wrote:
Yes
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 01:42:46PM +0300, Andrew L. Neporada wrote:
On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 02:52:21PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
Chances are you don't have things configured quite correctly in the
bios. The interrupts aren't asserting proplerly.
Interrupts 3,4,10,11 are reserved for
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 06:52:41AM +0100, Milan Obuch wrote:
On Friday 21 January 2005 00:51, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Milan Obuch wrote this message on Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 10:00 +0100:
[skip]
Great, could we cooperate?
Sure, though Joerg Wunsch has been doing work w/ I2C more
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 10:59:39AM +0100, Bram Van Steenlandt wrote:
Hi,
I've been having some problems with the following:
ex1: I have two scsi scanners and I use sane to scan all works well my
two scanners are /dev/pass0 and /dev/pass1 however when one of them is
turned of the device
On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 10:36:07PM -0800, Douglas Allen wrote:
Hi hackers,
I am interested in connecting my Linux machine to my windows XP machine.
Neither Linux nor Windows is FreeBSD, why do you ask in a FreeBSD
list?
I was going to try the USB ports first. Now I've opened a can
On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 08:17:39PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Sat, 2004-Dec-18 02:03:09 -0500, Gary Corcoran wrote:
I suppose it
is possible these errors may have shown up more than a week or
two ago, because my windows machines, reaching them via samba,
haven't shown any problems until
On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 08:07:20AM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Sat, 2004-Dec-18 20:59:11 +0100, Bernd Walter wrote:
On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 08:17:39PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
My approach to this is to add a line similar to
dd if=/dev/ad0 of=/dev/null bs=32k
for each disk into /etc
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 09:50:05AM -0800, Paul Armstrong wrote:
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 05:05:28PM +0100, Erik Trulsson wrote:
This is to provide compatibility whn working with multiple versions of
Unix.
I write many scripts in sh on Solaris, and find they just don't work on
Linux
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 04:22:12PM +0300, Niki Denev wrote:
Bernd Walter writes:
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 03:30:05PM +0300, Niki Denev wrote:
If you already an interface driver atatched then ugen fails to attach
the whole device.
well, i think that this can be a problem sometimes.
Yes
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 03:30:05PM +0300, Niki Denev wrote:
Hello everyone!,
The last 1-2 days i've been trying to make some userspace OBEX utilities to
work with a USB based Nokia GSM phone and doing this i discovered something
that confuses me a little:
The phone in question is Nokia
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 10:53:23PM -0400, Greg Hormann wrote:
I'm working to develop a communications program to control a piece of
vendor supplied hardware. (They only provide a control program for
Windows.) I think I'm close. The device uses a RS-232 - RS-485 convert
which I belive is
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 07:04:44PM +0400, Alex K wrote:
Hello, everyone!
As far as I understand drivers for USB devices are selected and attached
based on USB VendorID and ProductID match. Here I have situation where
I have 2 diffrent USB devices (cables) which got same Vendor and Device
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 06:05:55PM +0400, Alex K wrote:
Hello!
Bernd Walter wrote:
uplcom takes devices (or maybe interfaces) based on vendor/product ID.
What approach will you recommend?
What is your problem?
2 different USB devices with same vendor/product ID, only revision
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 03:59:27AM +, mark wrote:
I'm looking for a work around to this usb ethernet problem.
With FreeBSD-5.2.1-p5, device ehci added to the default GENERIC kernel,
the axe device works fine in USB 2.0 mode, when plugged in after boot
(AFTER ehci driver is
On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 10:38:42AM -0400, Rita Lin wrote:
Hello,
I'm writing a USB driver for a device that does not have any interrupt. It only has
Bulk-in and Bulk-out. A periodic polling status from default pipe is required to
have a smooth data transfer. I used timeout() routine to
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 04:37:22PM -0400, Rita Lin wrote:
But I don't understand the whole issue you have.
Just schedule a request and wait for the device to ack.
The Host controller does the polling for you as long as the request is
queued and the timeout value supplied with the request
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 06:48:14PM -0400, Rita Lin wrote:
That is what I call a bad design.
You waste resources because the device designer did not take the
features he had available.
Okay, I guess so. There are also other minor things that I don't understand
why
the device is implemented
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 05:36:47PM -0400, Rita Lin wrote:
Igh - that sounds like a very bad device design then.
There would have been lots a ways to do in a clean way without
additional pipes - such as transfering 0 sized packets to trigger a
status inquiry or by adding status bytes in
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 01:29:29PM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 18:28, Bernd Walter wrote:
I am wondering if there is any way of telling if a given umass device is
a floppy drive (or wants to look like one) - eg I have a USB FDD which
I imagine should fall
On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 10:47:48PM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
A friend of mine handed me a USB flash key today that has 2 'partition' - one
1.44Mb chunk pretends to be a floppy drive and the rest is a normal umass
device.
I am wondering if there is any way of telling if a given umass
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 12:34:43PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marcel Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 03:36:02PM -0700, othermark wrote:
: I have a multi-port PCI card under puc and sio that has 4 19200
: connections
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 02:01:56PM -0400, Louis A. Mamakos wrote:
Those cards are just what they are - cheap.
They have very small FIFOs and they don't use DMA.
IRQ sharing makes them even worse than traditional ISA stuff.
My advise for cost efficient and fast serials is getting USB ones.
On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 09:32:11AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: I agree that it's bad to yank a device from under ugen automatically and
: reattach it to a better match.
I think it is good. Really. However, ugen should mark the device
busy when it is opened, and mark it as unbusy as
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 07:44:34PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sam Lawrance [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: On Sun, 2004-03-28 at 20:47, Bernd Walter wrote:
: On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 01:31:03AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: Btw, any interest
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 01:46:32AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bernd Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 07:44:34PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Sam Lawrance [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 01:31:03AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bernd Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 04:55:56PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Bernd Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 02:51:56AM -0800, jitendra pande wrote:
Hi,
I have stuck with a problem with usb devices.
In case of FreeBSD 4.8, whenever a new USB device is attached to the system, no
device node is dynamically being created within the dev file system.
This is in contrast
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 04:55:56PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bernd Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: I'm working on getting devd(8) usable for usb devices.
The part I'm not sure about is where you add the pnpinfo to the
devaddq stuff. All
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 10:27:39AM +1100, Sam Lawrance wrote:
Hi,
usbd's present behaviour when reading usbd.conf is to scan from top to
bottom and use the first match.
What if it was changed to use the last, most specific match? That is,
the last match with the most of (product, vendor)
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 02:43:57PM +0900, Katsushi Kobayashi wrote:
If the device works with SBP-II protocol, I believe it will work on CAM
framework as usual SCSI device.
umass(4) should work for USB as well.
On 2004/03/17, at 14:39, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone have any? Do
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 04:29:04PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
Hi,
My company uses RS485 to talk to various pieces of hardware, and currently to
do this we have a hacked up copy of sio which talks to a conventional RS485
card, while this works well it would be nicer to be able to use
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 07:57:24PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 07:27:31AM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote:
Currently I get the states via kern.cp_time, but this only allows
a granularity of a single second and I need something around 50-100ms.
As far as I can tell - both
Currently I get the states via kern.cp_time, but this only allows
a granularity of a single second and I need something around 50-100ms.
Application is a LED bargraph which doesn't have the intended effect
with just a single update per second.
--
B.Walter BWCT
I noticed with a self build serial driver that I'm not allowed
to put data into a tty that is not opened.
I had to learn this the hard way and would like to know if there are
other points that I'm not aware of.
Is there any good documentation about kernel tty programming available?
--
B.Walter
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 07:09:18PM +0800, Ganbold wrote:
Hi all,
Maybe this is off topic question. I'm looking for good tftp server in
FreeBSD.
I used default tftp server in FreeBSD and had some problems. It sometimes
hangs without any response.
I think debugging info (e.g. tcpdump)
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 04:48:25PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
note that this was pre-0.34, but since its still under development,
there is always the chance that this happens again ... a load of the
system took 49hrs, I believe was mentioned ... how long to dump/reload the
system once its
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 04:14:10PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Stijn Hoop wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 03:26:00PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
The kernel includes teh ichsmb driver to try access the SMBus
for temperature reading reasons (yes I know I can
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 01:58:11AM -0600, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 11:50:59PM -0800 I heard the voice of
Avleen Vig, and lo! it spake thus:
While it is indeed true that most machines since 1997 will support this
CD format, please take in to account:
And,
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 05:34:05PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Wednesday 07 January 2004 17:08, Bernd Walter wrote:
I don't think it IS a dumb device, there is a USB spec called DFU which
covers it and the hosts job is to do the reenumeration.
Sparing a transistor to offload
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 01:05:57PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote:
after all my confusions, my problem was solved once netif was made
executable.
It's always one of those inconspicuous details :)
--
B.Walter BWCThttp://www.bwct.de
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 11:04:37AM +0100, Daan Vreeken [PA4DAN] wrote:
For the device this means having to switch the ROM image with the RAM image
which is impossible while running in the specific processor. Thus the
processor tells it's core to map RAM into code-space and resets itself.
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 01:55:41PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote:
while hunting down the problem that my diskless configuration is not
starting the loopback interface i came about the following:
Mmmm - everythings OK for me:
[51]cicely14# ifconfig lo0
lo0: flags=8049UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 04:05:15PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Tuesday 06 January 2004 18:47, Bernd Walter wrote:
When setting a USB device to configuration number USB_UNCONFIG_NO (i.e.
0), the device goes into an unconfigured state with an invalid
dev-cdesc. How does one then leave
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 04:44:46PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Wednesday 07 January 2004 16:35, Bernd Walter wrote:
Bad device - it would have been so easy add an single transitor to do
this automaticaly.
Nevertheless USB_UNCONFIG_NO can't help you here.
What you need to do
On Fri, Dec 26, 2003 at 10:54:27AM -0800, Sean Welch wrote:
That change seems to have done it!!
I left in the extra PCI IDs I had added to pcisupport.c
and pci_cfgreg.c -- looks like that helps get things
going. I've got options PCI_ENABLE_IO_MODES in
the kernel. I've also got device puc
On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 03:17:18PM -0500, David Gilbert wrote:
Bernd == Bernd Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bernd On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 03:10:10PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bernd wrote:
Should device ehci be a default in GENERIC, then?
Bernd It is intentionally not in GENERIC
On Sun, Nov 23, 2003 at 08:50:45PM -0500, Michael E. Mercer wrote:
Hello peoples,
I posted this to questions with no reply, I was hoping
someone here may be able to give some insight.
Question: Should I be able to open /dev/ugen0 more than once?
I am using FreeBSD 4.9-Stable,
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 10:47:35AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently got a usb 2.0 hard drive to which I painfully wait for 1MB/s
transfers. According to dmesg fbsd is only doing 1.0:
usb0: Intel 82801DB (ICH4) USB controller USB-A on uhci0
usb0: USB revision 1.0
usb1: Intel
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 03:10:10PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should device ehci be a default in GENERIC, then?
It is intentionally not in GENERIC.
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Bernd Walter wrote:
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 10:47:35AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently got a usb 2.0
is more speed with less functionality.
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Bernd Walter wrote:
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 03:10:10PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should device ehci be a default in GENERIC, then?
It is intentionally not in GENERIC.
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Bernd Walter wrote
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 01:19:44PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Bernd Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 03:06:18PM +1000, John Birrell wrote:
Here's one the size of a credit card: http://www.compulab.co.il/586core.htm.
It's a lot bigger than a 'bump in a cable
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 08:33:46PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 01:26:33PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Oct 10), Bernd Walter said:
buf.c_iflag |= IGNBRK;
buf.c_cflag = ~(CSIZE | PARODD);
buf.c_cflag |= CS8 | CLOCAL
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 03:17:13PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bernd Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 01:26:33PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
: In the last episode (Oct 10), Bernd Walter said:
: buf.c_iflag |= IGNBRK
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 03:06:18PM +1000, John Birrell wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 04:17:37PM +0200, C. Kukulies wrote:
Now, we are not far from that. I'm thinking of some CPU with TP Ethernet
and memory of size of an USB stick. Anyone knowing such or having
experience?
Here's one
void
opensio(char* devname) {
struct termios buf;
int val;
fd = open(devname, O_RDWR);
if (fd 0) {
printf(open serial %s failed: %s\n,
devname, strerror(errno));
exit(1);
}
val =
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 01:26:33PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Oct 10), Bernd Walter said:
buf.c_iflag |= IGNBRK;
buf.c_cflag = ~(CSIZE | PARODD);
buf.c_cflag |= CS8 | CLOCAL | PARENB;
Do you maybe want CS7 here?
No I need 8e1, but the output
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 07:37:42PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 11:51:06AM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote:
You need to lock when reading if you insist on consistent data. Even a
simple read may be non-atomic (this should be the case for 64bit
operations on all our platforms).
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 12:12:22PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 11:51:06AM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote:
+ You need to lock when reading if you insist on consistent data. Even a
+ simple read may be non-atomic (this should be the case for 64bit
+ operations on all our
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 02:11:12PM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote:
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Bernd Walter wrote:
BWOn Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 12:12:22PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
BW But I'm not talking about non-atomic reads. What I'm want to show is that
BW even atomic read (without lock
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 02:58:02PM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote:
uint8_t foo;
(guaranteeing that the data type itself is atomic). But if a writer sets
foo as above and you read foo without locking, you might get a wrong
value:
mtx_lock(...)
foo = 77;
-
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 10:25:48AM +0200, Christoph P. Kukulies wrote:
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 11:36:29PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
You can't expect anything reliable from a device which is broken.
The kernel already warned you that something seems to be questionable.
In the same way you
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 08:21:28PM +0200, C. Kukulies wrote:
I have disabled the SIO on my ASUS P4SX board because I have a PCI modem
card inserted. But the modem card or the sio on it doesn't seem to be detected
by the kernel. Instead I see two sios (sio0 and sio1) which are flagged
as
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 11:23:34PM +0200, Christoph P. Kukulies wrote:
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 10:15:08PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 08:21:28PM +0200, C. Kukulies wrote:
I have disabled the SIO on my ASUS P4SX board because I have a PCI modem
card inserted
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 05:26:33AM +0200, Barry Bouwsma wrote:
[Drop hostname part of IPv6-only address above to obtain IPv4-capable e-mail,
or just drop me from the recipients and I'll catch up from the archives]
Hallo Hackers, I suppose I should post this to -current as the code in
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 06:17:43PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On 24-Sep-2003 M. Warner Losh wrote:
You might want to make sure that you have an up to date stable. There
was a fix to the PCI bridge interrupt swizzle.
Ah yes, that's true. However, it doesn't seem that his interrupt is
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 06:32:42PM +0200, Barry Bouwsma wrote:
[Drop hostname part of IPv6-only address above to obtain IPv4-capable e-mail,
or just drop me from the recipients and I'll catch up from the archives]
Hello every last one of you,
First, before I spout off in the wrong
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 11:11:39PM +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
--
FreeBSD-5.1-CURRENT/alpha
SYSTEM MEMORY INFORMATION:
mem_wire: 32555008 ( 31MB) [ 12%] Wired: disabled for paging out
mem_active:
I need to add I2C support for a Elan520 based soekris system.
The system has the required GPIO pins and there is the iicbb driver
to handle generic bitbang code - just needing a simple layer driver to
enable, disable and read pins.
But unlike normal isa/pci hardware probing the existence of the
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 05:52:57PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bernd Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: Back to the original question:
: How do I get the device_t from nexus?
You don't. You are assigned one.
: Is there a get_nexus() function
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 04:32:43PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On 08-Aug-2003 Bernd Walter wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 03:48:22PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On 08-Aug-2003 Bernd Walter wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 02:27:30PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
Well, that would
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 07:27:42PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bernd Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: The host bridge is not available yet at probing time of the host bridge.
: What we have is the host bridges parent (nexus) in the calling function
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 06:03:38PM +1000, John Birrell wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 09:44:08AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Birrell writes
:
I'm not convinced that any hacking is required other than passing the
device_t parent to
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 03:48:22PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On 08-Aug-2003 Bernd Walter wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 02:27:30PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
Well, that would be a major pain on current since nexus is already
finished attaching many of its drivers by the time it gets
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 06:37:10PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bernd Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 05:52:57PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Bernd Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 08:39:37PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Birrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 07:45:32PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: The SC520 has onboard support to control 3 flash chips.
: The board I have has 2
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 03:34:01PM -0400, Eric Jacobs wrote:
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 13:00:13 +0200
Bernd Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Back to the original question:
How do I get the device_t from nexus?
Is there a get_nexus() function somewhere?
You can do it this way:
devclass_t
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 12:45:43PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bernd Walter writes:
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 12:18:28PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bernd Walter writes:
From the logicaly standpoint the extensions had
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 04:32:43PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On 08-Aug-2003 Bernd Walter wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 03:48:22PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On 08-Aug-2003 Bernd Walter wrote:
However - I would still like to know why
device_add_child(nexus, elanbb, -1);
results
On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 01:38:05PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
After adding you patch and some includes (machine/pci_cfgreg.h,
dev/pci/pcireg.h)
[...]
pci_open(1):mode 1 addr port (0x0cf8) is 0x
pci_open(1a): mode1res=0x8000 (0x8000)
pci_cfgcheck: device 0 [class
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 07:56:26AM -0700, Paulo Roberto wrote:
Hello,
I am about to code my first kmod. I am trying to port an usb camera to
FreeBSD, and since I am new at system development, I hope you don't
mind helping me out. If this is not the correct list I should post,
please point
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 02:27:30PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On 08-Aug-2003 Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Birrell writes
:
I'm not convinced that any hacking is required other than passing the
device_t parent to nexus_pcib_is_host_bridge (in STABLE) as
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 12:18:28PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bernd Walter writes:
I need to add I2C support for a Elan520 based soekris system.
The system has the required GPIO pins and there is the iicbb driver
to handle generic bitbang code - just needing
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 12:04:21AM +0200, Daan Vreeken [PA4DAN] wrote:
On Monday 21 July 2003 15:00, Bernd Walter wrote:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 09:18:42AM +0200, Marco Molteni wrote:
[I sent the same message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but since that list
seems not very active, I am asking
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 09:18:42AM +0200, Marco Molteni wrote:
[I sent the same message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but since that list
seems not very active, I am asking here too]
Hi all,
the subject says it all.
I am considering using FreeBSD for a robotics project, and I am
thinking of
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 10:12:36AM +0300, Danny Braniss wrote:
hi all,
googling shows this not to be anything new, but ...
it happend when we enabled tcp/nfs on our NetApp fileservers.
so the question is:
1- is it serious - it doesn't seem so ...
2- can it be ignored?
On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 12:37:10PM +0300, Danny Braniss wrote:
[...]
have fun. the mindshare book is good. however, it took me a long
time to get a usb 'aha' moment and understand its twisty maze was
really a workable design obscured by standardese... I suspect it is a
problem in the
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 01:13:56PM +0300, Danny Braniss wrote:
hi,
while trying to port an application that works with tty to uplcom/ucom,
(and it doesn't work :-), and looking at the kernel sources and
trying to figure out USB, i think that select(2)/poll(2) will not work,
correct?
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 03:27:30PM +0300, Danny Braniss wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 01:13:56PM +0300, Danny Braniss wrote:
hi,
while trying to port an application that works with tty to uplcom/ucom,
(and it doesn't work :-), and looking at the kernel sources and
trying to figure
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 02:58:28PM -0400, Louis A. Mamakos wrote:
I think the problem is that the USB hardware doesn't try to read data
from the peripheral until the user-mode code does a read(2) system
call. I had this problem with the ugen device. I would guess that
the ucom/umodem devices
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 05:45:12PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
Hi !
I'm using a USB adapter to plug a HDD into my FreeBSD-4.8 box.
If I boot with the device pluged-in, it works fine, but if I plug it in after
boot or unplug then replug it, it doesn't work anymore (I get timeout
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 11:30:28PM +1000, Andrew wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2003, Bernd Walter wrote:
If you have no /dev/ugen?.? then the device has no other endpoints in
its current configuration.
The usbctl tool mentioned above is good to check devices about their
capabilities.
usbctl
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 11:47:55PM +1000, Andrew wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Bernd Walter wrote:
Not all endpoints have to be available in the current configuration.
If you show me the output for your device I can tell you what is
available under which condition.
Thanks, output
101 - 200 of 349 matches
Mail list logo
