On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:57:16 -0600 Scott Long wrote:
> Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > Since nobody answered so far, here is my two cents. I'm not an expert
> > here so it's only my imho.
> >
> > On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 22:52:49 +0400 Alexey Popov wrote:
> >
&g
Hi!
Since nobody answered so far, here is my two cents. I'm not an expert
here so it's only my imho.
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 22:52:49 +0400 Alexey Popov wrote:
> interrupt total rate
> irq6: fdc0 8 0
> irq14: ata0
On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 12:31:57 +0200 Ivan Voras wrote:
> Of course, additions, corrections, etc. are also welcome.
It may be worth mentioning that iscsi_initiator appeared.
WBR
--
Boris Samorodov (bsam)
Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP
FreeBSD committe
Hi Ivan!
On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 12:31:57 +0200 Ivan Voras wrote:
> As some of you may know, I'm maintaining a web page which aims to
> enumerate and describe major new features for FreeBSD 7, located at
> http://ivoras.sharanet.org/freebsd/freebsd7.html .
> Since 7.0 should be released "soon", I'd
quot; (total
> > of 32meg of buffer). Team seems to not want to buffer more than 1m per
> > process and I think 32 is the max # of processes.
> Someone, please take a look at trivial patch for team's buffer size here:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/106806
&g
l and
> recompiling with a build-world?
> I'm currently trying to build a moderate large system with 4 presentation
> servers, 2 database servers and one large storage system using NFS mapped to
> ~1.2 terrabyte of SATA disks (4x Maxtor 500GB 7200 RPM disks w/RAID5
> config). Any suggest
6 matches
Mail list logo
