Re: Pull in upstream before 9.1 code freeze?

2012-07-04 Thread Brett Glass
le pain as possible. --Brett Glass ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Pull in upstream before 9.1 code freeze?

2012-07-04 Thread Brett Glass
e the option of installing dnscache, with the so-called "Jumbo" patch, as the default resolver. I beleive that the code has been released into the public domain. --Brett Glass ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org

RE: Negative ping times with FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE on older Celeron system

2011-09-12 Thread Brett Glass
ipset, PII-generation Celeron but still effectively a "686") which was not a problem when it was running FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE (as it was before). Any ideas? --Brett Glass # ping localhost PING localhost (127.0.0.1): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=-0.148 m

Negative ping times with FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE on older Celeron system

2011-09-12 Thread Brett Glass
led xl0: promiscuous mode disabled dc0: TX underrun -- increasing TX threshold dc0: TX underrun -- increasing TX threshold Any hints here as to what's wrong? --Brett Glass ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/

Re: Wine compatibility and performance on FreeBSD 7

2007-12-11 Thread Brett Glass
t, threatened to withdraw support from some of these developers unless the license was switched to the GPL, thus forcing their hands. --Brett Glass ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers

Re: Wine compatibility and performance on FreeBSD 7

2007-12-10 Thread Brett Glass
It's worth noting that the WINE project, not long ago, abandoned the BSD license for the GPL despite urging from many sources to keep the code open and free for use by developers. We've stopped using it as a result. --Brett Glass At 10:59 AM 12/6/2007, Tom Wickline wrote: >Oh yea,

Re: Where is FreeBSD going?

2004-01-08 Thread Brett Glass
At 07:47 PM 1/6/2004, Avleen Vig wrote: >Advocacy is NOT a race Yes, it is. Linux is where it is today because it grabbed more buzz, sooner, than BSD. --Brett Glass ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/free

RE: Where is FreeBSD going?

2004-01-06 Thread Brett Glass
At 04:00 PM 1/5/2004, Munden, Randall J wrote: >I think this is what is on my mind these days. I'm preparing to load >up some machines for production soon (I've already put it off for too >long waiting for 5-STABLE) and I don't like what I'm seeing -- with >both the mud slinging here and the per

RE: Where is FreeBSD going?

2004-01-06 Thread Brett Glass
At 12:40 PM 1/5/2004, Munden, Randall J wrote: >Right. What concerns me most is the rise in the incidence of trolls all >trolling about the same subject or along the same vein. Would someone >please explain what is going on? As a production user of fBSD this is >troubling. It's probably one

RE: Where is FreeBSD going?

2004-01-06 Thread Brett Glass
ers have a big stake in FreeBSD, and are just as likely (perhaps more likely) to be good leaders for the project. --Brett Glass At 11:43 AM 1/5/2004, Munden, Randall J wrote: >This makes me wonder if it isn't time for a new -core. > >-Original Message- >From: Maxim Hermi

Forged messages

2003-01-05 Thread Brett Glass
been filed with that service. Until the account is disabled, kindly ignore all mail from that address. --Brett Glass To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: bgcc, an idea

2003-01-05 Thread Brett Glass
Bill Fumerola wrote: > Fuck you Brett, we don't want you here. Speak for yourself asshole. Or have you forgotten already that it was you who caused asmodai to resign? A lot of people have contacted me already and given positive feedback for the 0.0 beta, so shut up. Sincerely, -- Bre

Re: bgcc, an idea

2003-01-05 Thread Brett Glass
o the hackers list, or to any of the FreeBSD lists. If you're not up to the job, don't bother sending bogus bug reports and patches. Now go and read a book on Unix programming. Sincerely, -- Brett Glass [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://fastmail.fm - One of many happy users: http:

bgcc, an idea

2003-01-05 Thread Brett Glass
After the thread on GPL'd parts of FreeBSD, specially the compiler, I've decided to contribute my bit to the FreeBSD community. I'm proud to preset bgcc, 'The Brett Glass compiler collection', released under the BSD license, of course. As a lot of you know, I'm a pr

Great. Now, the anti-BSD spammers are spamming BSD mailing lists.

2002-08-18 Thread Brett Glass
Time to get that Hotmail account turned off. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: The problem with FreeBSD

2002-06-18 Thread Brett Glass
ime flaming other people. FUCK YOU FUMEROLA! You actually make some good points about the nastiness of some people in the FreeBSD community. Alas, you discredit yourself by posting pseudonymously and by doing a great deal of flaming yourself. --Brett Glass To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PR

Re: ppp problems on 4.3-RELEASE and PPPoE

2001-05-21 Thread Brett Glass
hen it may be >worth seeing what ``show physical'' and ``show timer'' say (is the >link open, or is ppp waiting for something to happen via a timeout?). > >If pppctl isn't working it's worth building with -g and trying a kill >-11 (or attaching w

Re: Great American Gas Out

2000-03-04 Thread Brett Glass
gy policies and fuel costs aren't driven by markets or even common sense. They are controlled by big cartels, big government, and politics. --Brett Glass To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: Possible optimization in VM?

2000-01-07 Thread Brett Glass
At 10:42 PM 1/6/2000 , Matthew Dillon wrote: >Hmm. Well, you could copy the page to C1 in order to avoid creating > a C2 layer, at least as long as you do not have other entities sharing > B directly (e.g. C3, C4, ...). Yes, if you had C3, C4, etc. (multiple children), you'd need