I think I would rather see people tweaking the heck out of the existing UFS
filesystem and implementing new ways of getting it to go faster.
Implementing a whole new filesystem would probably take a lot of work, and
the performance wouldn't be much better anyways. IMHO, people interested in
I'm going to have to agree with your idea in general, however there are
parts that I disagree with. First, taking all of the code from Linux may not
be good for the FreeBSD project. That would steer FreeBSD into being more
like yet another Linux distro instead of an independent project. Just
I have been experiencing the EXACT same problem as Mr.David Rufino. The only
thing that I could think of that may be at fault is that I compiled with K6
optimisations.
Craig
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
I think that burncd is a good program, and I appreciate the development of
it, but I feel that there may be a better solution for owners of atapi
burners. cdrecord is basically an industry standard, and should be able to
be used by owers of atapi burners under FreeBSD. Linux has a driver
4 matches
Mail list logo