|## 2446
22 |## 500
23 |## 326
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/*
* Copyright (c) 2001 ThinkSec AS. All rights reserved.
*
* $ThinkSec$
*/
#include err.h
#include time.h
#include stdio.h
#include stdlib.h
static int accepted
and committing them.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You could take a look at www.FreeBSD.org/handbook/kerneldebug.html
and provide a bit more details about that crash; at the very least,
a 'where' or 'bt' would be useful.
That, and a dmesg, or at least uname -a.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL
Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There was at the time - socketpair(2) had totally slipped my mind ;)
Umm, you want pipe(2), not socketpair(2).
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" i
Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 04:53:34PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There was at the time - socketpair(2) had totally slipped my mind ;)
Umm, you want pipe(2), not socketpair(2).
Actually, I want
way around, actually (we increased KVM space from 256 MB to
1 GB - not 2 GB as you claim). And the problem with legacy BSDI
binaries (newer ones don't have this problem) was fixed a long time
ago, in 3.0 (before 3.0-RELEASE).
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail
ons PNPBIOS' to your
kernel. If that doesn't solve your problem, we have a bug.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
--- 1,7
! three
! ducks
! swim
! in
! a
little
! pond
des@flood ~% diff -u old new
--- old Sun Mar 11 03:07:31 2001
+++ new Sun Mar 11 03:08:08 2001
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-the
+three
+ducks
+swim
+in
+a
little
-horse
-jumped
-over
-the
-fence
+pond
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED
vmstat showing 100% busy and iostat showing 10% busy..
No, -vmstat and -iostat are showing 13 and 12 tps (transactions per
second), respectively. -iostat doesn't show a "busy percentage".
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
it nevertheless does.
OK, doing a stat and checking the mtime should give you
the info at the expense of polling, I can't think of another way.
Won't help. You'll get the same mtime no matter whether the file is
actually written to disk or not.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED
Anton Berezin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So is there a way, or is not?
No. If there was a way to tell it'd be a bug.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Peter Dufault [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Won't help. You'll get the same mtime no matter whether the file is
actually written to disk or not.
No, the spec says: [...]
Oops, I was thinking "regular file with softupdates", not "mmapped
file" (note to self: get more sleep)
Tony Finch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What about setrlimit(RLIMIMT_DATA)?
Yep, I'd forgotten about that. Malloc() will return NULL if you hit
your data size limit.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ha
Kenneth Wayne Culver [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 24 Feb 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Kenneth Wayne Culver [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FreeBSD supports cardbus in -CURRENT, but I wouldn't expect it to ever
support cardbus in 4.x. If you are daring you can get -CURRENT, but from
what
"Daniel C. Sobral" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It doesn't work. The application killed by reason of insufficient
resources is not (necessarily) the one that causes the page fault
leading to that.
This is arguably a bug which needs to be fixed.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL
, but it takes some
hand-holding.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
d segfault.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
of memory that's already mapped and you'll be fine, but
sometimes (when allocating beyond what was previously used) it won't.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Seebach) writes:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes:
Malloc() does not overcommit - the kernel does. Malloc() doesn't know
and doesn't care.
But it could still probably force the behavior.
Barring kernel changes, not easily, and only for single
allocated.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
, my experience is that unless you're paying Sun significant
amounts of $$, their reaction to bug reports is to close their eyes,
hum real loud and hope they go away.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ha
other, you can also just specify that one file on the
command line.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
ethod uses a
compile directory in /usr/src.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Robin Cutshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Any ideas as to why it would take almost three times longer to build
on FreeBSD?
Yup: 4.x sucks at SMP. Try the comparison again with uniprocessor
kernels - I expect you'll see a much smaller difference.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED
by the kernel make process.
Of course not. It's not part of the kernel. There's a duplicate of
this file in /usr/src/sys/netinet which need to be kept in synch.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ha
doing I/O,
and if you're already doing I/O as fast as you can there's no room for
improvement. On a machine with a slower CPU or a faster I/O system,
you'd see improvement.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe fr
, not the old 486DX33 you have
lying in a corner.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Jordan Hubbard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...] That implies to me, at least, that after a certain
point the CPU is going to be the bottleneck.
More likely RAM bandwidth. Those 133 Mhz FSBs ought to help, though.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe
. Stuff on disk has to be read into memory, and this
is generally done by DMAing it off the disk, which locks the memroy
bus, then copying it out into userland. With an MFS you skip the first
part, unless MFS is stupider than I thought.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe
down for however long
you need to upgrade it (somewhere between half an hour and two hours
depending on disk speeds and how much tinkering is needed).
DES (been there, done that)
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe fr
every page during startup.
Unless some form of clustering is done, this causes 16384 write
operations for a 64 MB virtual machine...
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
it eventually
breaks.)
Get a better job. Skilled IT workers are rare enough that they
shouldn't need to put up with such crap, and shouldn't have any
trouble getting a new job when the crap starts flying.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
half a
year ago. If you absolutely must run RELENG_3, don't run anything but
the very latest 3.5-STABLE (cvsup and cvs are your friends).
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
.
Well, it was a stupid decision at that time, and the decision not to
upgrade or replace these machines now is even stupider.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
the day (or even the week) on which it occurred?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Chet Ramey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bash uses the presence of SSH_CLIENT to decide whether or not to run the
shell startup files for a non-interactive shell (like it attempts to do
for rsh). [...]
Feh. Here's a nickel, kid, get yourself a real shell.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL
vijay [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi, I am new to FreeBSD. I wanted to know if I can play audio
CDs on "my" system.
'man cdcontrol'
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
psychological block is a much bigger obstacle to overcome than
actual technical complexity.
(hmm, I must remember to drop by Mustang Jack next time I'm in NYC)
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Zhiui Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there a way to specify a kernel other than /kernel to boot from? I do
not want to do this manually, I want to put it into some configuration
file. Thanks,
'man loader'
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail
Alexander Langer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thus spake Dag-Erling Smorgrav ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Alexander Langer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There recently (last week or something) was a thread here or on
another mailinglist on how to debug kernel moduls, which is a little
bit tricky
Jos Backus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This patch gets rid of the Broken pipe messages.
No need to name the loop...
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
happens ?
If the value you return is non-zero, see above. If it's zero, the
userland syscall code returns p-p_retval[0] to the caller.
* Does this logic also apply to the Linux syscall stuff in the kernel?
I think so. Marcel would be better placed to answer that.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL
ed setting some option in the kernel and compiling a new
one.
Congratulations, you just invented capabilities! :)
http://www.trustedbsd.org/
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
"Crist J. Clark" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 01:51:43AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Chris Stenton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Fatal server error:
xf86OpenConsole: Server must be suid root
This is your
'm
tempted to reply "not much more than it already is". Eivind and I
rewrote it for our previous employer, but the mod is part of a large
chunk of proprietary code, unfortunately.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "un
the scripts so we're reasonably confident that they can't do
much harm except to themselves.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Chris Stenton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Fatal server error:
xf86OpenConsole: Server must be suid root
This is your clue.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe fr
ll notice"
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
; nor does it chroot as far as I recall.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
told me to store these limits (above) in
a etc/sysctl.conf file but when I went to etc that
file wasn't in there .. do I have to newly create the
file or should it already be there?
'man sysctl.conf'
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
"Julian Stacey [EMAIL PROTECTED]" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Penguin mascot has enough advantages over Chuck already !
Then why do I get this urge to go bowling every time I see Tux?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
Jamie Heckford [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In all honesty, I am just looking for something to play
with and see how fast FreeBSD can go.
I'd say about 2.8 m/s/s, given sufficient height.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jamie Heckford [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In all honesty, I am just looking for something to play
with and see how fast FreeBSD can go.
I'd say about 2.8 m/s/s, given sufficient height.
Doh! I mean 9.8 m/s/s, of course.
DES
--
Dag-Erling
and 3.2-RELEASE CD
sets had the "waiter beastie" graphic (the one on 3.1 had no tail!),
but by 3.3 WC had reverted to Hosokawa-san's "beastie coming out of a
CD" artwork.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "un
if the directory exists; make sure to differentiate between
"somebody already holds the lock" and "the lock can't be created due
to permission errors or some other problem" by examining $!)
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTE
Volker Stolz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 01:35:08PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
What are you guys smoking?
*shrug* Can you spell "event-driven"? There are ways to do things much
more elegantly today (see all the references to kevent()).
I cho
Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 01:44:34PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Volker Stolz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 01:35:08PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
What are you guys smoking?
*shrug* Can you spell "event-d
can write a program
exactly like another, if you can prove you never saw the other
program. If you saw the similar program you are dirty.
ATT (or Novell, don't remember if it was before or after the sale of
USL) tried to use that argument against UCB. It was rejected.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgra
Netscape and StarOffice at the same time, 128MB
isn't enough. Sigh.
Avoid StarOffice like the plague. It's neat, but it leaks like a
sieve, and barely crawls along on my 450 MHz K6-2.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubs
ctly sets cpu_vendor to "ConnectixCPU"
(rather than e.g. "GenuineIntel" or "AuthenticAMD") you can just check
against that. It's declared in machine/md_var.h.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
cpu_is_vpc;
#endif
and not break anyone's heart?
No. Check cpu_vendor at probe/attach time and set a flag in the
interface's softc that indicates that it needs to be treated as a VPC
emulated interface.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
ta0-master: ata_command: identify failed
ad2: 39082MB Maxtor 54098U8 [79406/16/63] at ata1-master UDMA66
snip
I bet your CD-ROM is incorrectly configured as master.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe
an odd (and
preferably prime) stripe size on RAIDs to (amongst other reasons)
avoid having all the superblock backups end up on the same disk.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" i
(724 in your case -
closest primes are 719 and 727), create that many bucket directories,
and place each user in bucket ID mod K.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
is called to do its dance..
kern.* is not the right place for this. It should go in user.*, unless
that is reserved for userland, in which case a subtree of kern.* is
probably the Right Thing.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
s/sysctl.h.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
if a user logged on?
I'm pretty unsure about this..
Why don't you tell us what you want to do, instead of how you think it
must be done?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
(or was it /dev/null?)
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Remy Nonnenmacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, I may think using this solution if it remains portable between
Unixes.
It's perfectly portable, with one small variation - on BSD systems,
you pass -1 instead of a file descriptor, while on SysV
"G. Adam Stanislav" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 06:11:06PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
The second and third sentences of the second paragraph (the one that
starts on line 23), as well as the entire eighth paragraph (that
starts on line 45), address the
this case, the hype
that an Internet year is only a few weeks of wallclock time.
I'm sure there must be some meaning to what you write, but it keeps
eluding me.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
an address to the
function. I don't get it... What address? I want it to allocate memory
for me and tell me its address. How am I supposed to know what address
is available???
Did you even read the man page?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
Brandon Fosdick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
"Recently"? nslookup has been officially deprecated for about a year
and a half, I believe.
Will a replacement be added to the base distro? When?
1) nslookup is still in the base FreeBSD distribution, and will
"G. Adam Stanislav" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 04:32:29PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Did you even read the man page?
Many times, actually. And on different days, too. :)
No, you didn't. You probably read the first line, then your eyes
glazed over and y
r messages, with timestamps, to various log
files located in /var/log (most prominently /var/log/messages) as
specified in /etc/syslogd.conf.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
void [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there any reason top couldn't add these up and report a %iowait
like Solaris'?
Yes. It would conceal valuable information. Do the adding up in your
head.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Jessem.
Amazing what people will do to evade killfiles. Plonk.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Josef Karthauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
# load -t md /filesystemfile
Shouldn't that be 'load -t md_root'?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
ch a state?
It has several, depending on the type of I/O the process is waiting
for: biord (waiting for a read operation to complete), biowr (waiting
for a write operation to complete), select (waiting for descriptors to
become readable / writable), etc.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL
-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
(2)
returned 2, which is ENOENT, i.e. the file didn't exist). If it
succeeded, the value returned is the result (a file descriptor in
open(2)'s case).
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" i
James Housley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I believe a correct and true statement is "FreeBSD is a direct decendant
of Unix(TM). Based on the BSD sources"
I don't think there's all that much left of the original BSD
sources... at least not in the kernel.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgra
Will someone please inform the gcc developers of the last decade's
advances in C standardization? Yes, Virginia, ISO C (it's not ISO C
any more, and hasn't been since 1989) does support 'long long' and the
'll' format.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail
) on December 16th,
1999, but gcc still seems to live in 1989-land.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
expect 4.2 will as well.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
---
#0 0xc0132df8 in boot ()
(kgdb) where
#0 0xc0132df8 in boot ()
Cannot access memory at address 0xce51d9b8.
(kgdb)
This probably means the panic was in a KLD.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe
somewhere?).
You might want to look at src/sys/i386/isa/if_rdp.c instead.
And yes, dl is available, though there's a header file called if_dl.h;
if your driver needs its own header file, call it if_dlreg.h.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
FengYue [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 3 Oct 2000, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
- panic messages:
- ---
- Where are the panic messages?
Unfortunately, there is no panic messages. I compiled the kernel with
-g (without DDB), and set the dumpdev in rc.conf. Did I do anything
wrong
Marc Tardif [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How can I find the source to specific functions in /usr/src/sys?
URL:http://lxr.linux.no/freebsd/source
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" i
has paid off :)
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
that, the only ugliness is
the need to fondle syscons' privates.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
to NetBSD native system call.
What is the difference between PEACE and WINE?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
/freebsd-smp/2423.freebsd-smp
Looks like it - and Andrew's the one who added support for the RCC in
the first place.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
I've hacked newsyslog(8) to accept a list of log files to process on
the command line (very useful in combination with -F). See attached
patches. I'll commit this in a few days if noone objects.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: newsyslog.8
though...
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
, and a severe oversight on my part.
2) Make the "exe" file in /linproc/pid/ a symlink to
"./private/exe", which is the file which gives
you the executables real vnode.
Sounds good. I'll get to it.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECT
gnore this one! What is it, anyway ??? */
DES (half past six aye emm, still at work...)
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
to report the load average in echo reply packets.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: ping.c
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sbin/ping/ping.c,v
retrieving revision 1.49
diff -u -r1.49 ping.c
--- ping.c 2000/01/14 23
when
running in "Network secure mode" (securelevel 3 or higher).
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: if.c
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/net/if.c,v
retrieving revision 1.77
diff -u -r1.77 if.c
--- if.c
monstrates the inadequacy of the secure
level mechanism.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
101 - 200 of 436 matches
Mail list logo
