f why the previous command failed.
--
David Brodbeck
System Administrator, Linguistics
University of Washington
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
I haven't encountered that, at least on RedHat. I routinely override
stuff in /etc/profile in my local .bash_profile. The bash manpage is
pretty explicit that /etc/profile is read first. Are some distros
doing something silly like sourcing /etc/profile in .bash_profile?
--
David Br
age if you're doing something pre-configured (like
starting/stopping an existing service), but if you want to do
something custom you have to do a *lot* of digging to figure out how
to make it work. Some of the new stuff (like NWAM network
configuration) is not even configurable without
nit systems are quite confusing. I recently spent most of a
day trying to figure out why Ubuntu wouldn't launch a new rc script
I'd installed before realizing that the parallel init system it uses
simply silently ignores scripts that don't indicate their dependencies
in a way it un
trouter, and the network address and
netmask in /etc/netmasks.
--
David Brodbeck
System Administrator, Linguistics
University of Washington
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Wojciech Puchar
wrote:
> i tried nfsv4, tested under FreeBSD over localhost and it is roughly the
> same. am i doing something wrong?
I found NFSv4 to be much *slower* than NFSv3 on FreeBSD, when I
benchmarked it a year or so ago.
--
David Brodbeck
y.
You also still see tape used a lot for offsite backups, although as
Internet speeds have gone up more and more of that is happening by sending
bits across the network instead of tapes over the highway. The bandwidth
of the proverbial station wagon full of tapes is no longer quite as
impressi
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 10/10/2011 11:55, David Brodbeck wrote:
> > Is there any reason to cache negative hits?
>
> It's very important for DNS since there are a fairly large number of
> misbehaving applications that don't stop queryin
of them except in some fairly specific circumstances, like
extracting a tarball as the root user with invalid UIDs. Maybe I'm missing
something, but it seems like turning off negative caching would avoid a lot
of potential problems for not much cost.
--
David Brodbeck
System Administrator, L
amba creates an account for the new machine, then
gets confused when a subsequent lookup of that account fails.
--
David Brodbeck
System Administrator, Linguistics
University of Washington
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.o
10 matches
Mail list logo
