On Fri, 16 Jul 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> I'm sorry, but when you write code for a safety related system you
> do not dynamically allocate memory at all. It's all essentially static.
> There is no issue with the memory resource. Besides, none of the BSD's
> are
> certified fo
On Fri, 16 Jul 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> I'm sorry, but when you write code for a safety related system you
> do not dynamically allocate memory at all. It's all essentially static.
> There is no issue with the memory resource. Besides, none of the BSD's are
> certified for
On Thu, 15 Jul 1999, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> For the record, professional digital cameras go into the $100K
> range, so I'd be expecting it not only to run Apache, but also to
> come with Doom. :-)
Well you have 16MB RAM, 32MB flash memory, a network interface,
other bits and Ne
On Thu, 15 Jul 1999, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> For the record, professional digital cameras go into the $100K
> range, so I'd be expecting it not only to run Apache, but also to
> come with Doom. :-)
Well you have 16MB RAM, 32MB flash memory, a network interface,
other bits and N
On Tue, 13 Jul 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> Jason, I am using real life situations to demonstrate my point. You are
> perfectly welcome to use your own REAL-LIFE situations to demonstrate
> yours. It is the real-life application that matters, not a worst-case
> nightmare theory
On Tue, 13 Jul 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> Jason, I am using real life situations to demonstrate my point. You are
> perfectly welcome to use your own REAL-LIFE situations to demonstrate
> yours. It is the real-life application that matters, not a worst-case
> nightmare theor
6 matches
Mail list logo