On 4/22/05, Lyndon Nerenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --On 2005-4-22 3:02 PM -0700 David Leimbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > According to the man page, and plan 9 where rfork originated you can
> > use it to modify an extant process. In fact you have to s
On 4/22/05, Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> David Leimbach wrote:
>
> >Perhaps David Xu could clue me in a bit more :)
> >
> >I just got around to reading the status report for FreeBSD and the 1:1
> >threading caught my eye.
> >
Perhaps David Xu could clue me in a bit more :)
I just got around to reading the status report for FreeBSD and the 1:1
threading caught my eye.
I'm not terribly familiar with FreeBSD's KSE based threading but
rather than adding a new system call [which may be ok... though I've
worked on systems w
Interesting question. People usually have to implement the C++
runtime to be usable from within the kernel. Things like exceptions
and "stdout" may not be defined in kernel space :)
I'm not terribly familiar with how it works on FreeBSD but I know it
took a special effort to get C++ support into
> Yes, procfs rules!
Procfs is from linux?
I thought it was from Plan 9... along with rfork :).
>
> -SB
> ___
> freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 09:30:47 -0800, mohamed aslan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i cann't reply to all of ur comments
> but , that is what makes u break off , as DragonFly split of u
So you're going to fork FreeBSD because we didn't think your comments
were constructive and that you don't like the o
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 21:11:07 +1000, Peter Jeremy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-Mar-28 23:23:19 -0800, David Leimbach wrote:
> >meant to send this to the list too... sorry
> >> Are you implying DragonFly uses FPU/SIMD? For that matter does any kernel?
> >
meant to send this to the list too... sorry
> Are you implying DragonFly uses FPU/SIMD? For that matter does any kernel?
I believe it does use SIMD for some of it's fast memcopy stuff for
it's messaging system
actually. I remember Matt saying he was working on it.
http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/m
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 23:49:25 +0200 (CEST), Webmaster Shizukana.net
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The user " mohamed aslan" wrote this strange object...:
> > hi guys
> > it's my first post here, BTW i was a linux hacker and linux kernel
> > mailing list member for 3 years.
> >
> > and i've a comment
On Sep 12, 2004, at 12:38 PM, Igor Shmukler wrote:
Why do you think that 970 does not have BAT registers?
There are 16 special purpose registers specifically to implement
Block
Address Translation.
Because Peter already told us that they have no BAT registers:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/
On Sep 12, 2004, at 9:59 AM, Igor Shmukler wrote:
Why do you think that 970 does not have BAT registers?
There are 16 special purpose registers specifically to implement Block
Address Translation.
Because Peter already told us that they have no BAT registers:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/fr
I am not subscribed to this list so I would appreciate it if you could CC me
in your responses.
I am trying to write some user code that will enable me to select one of the
four slots on my ATAPI cd changer.
I have noticed there is no explicit IOCTL for this function but that the the
acd_s
12 matches
Mail list logo
