Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man9 mutex.9 sx.9

2004-01-04 Thread Eivind Eklund
On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 05:12:21PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Sat, 3 Jan 2004, Scott Long wrote: > > > M. Warner Losh wrote: > > > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joseph Koshy) writes: > > > : How does one communicate information about a kernel configuratio

Re: import NetBSD rc system

2001-06-15 Thread Eivind Eklund
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 12:14:24PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > : Second, Eivind has already done > : some excellent work in this area. Take a look at > : http://people.freebsd.org/~eivind/newrc.html for more info. > > With all due respect to Eivind, he's reinventing the wheel. This is a misunder

Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?)

1999-12-11 Thread Eivind Eklund
On Mon, Dec 06, 1999 at 01:43:33PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote: > If we enforce a stabilizing period between .0 and .1 and branch at .1 > rather then at .0, this combined with the 12 month schedule should result > in pretty damn good releases. > > If we just do the 12 month schedu

Re: Bitkeeper license review

1999-12-02 Thread Eivind Eklund
On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 01:57:57PM +0100, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote: > >On Wed, 1 Dec 1999, Harlan Stenn wrote: > -On [19991202 07:00], Matthew Jacob ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > >> Anybody here have the time/inclination/ability to review a *draft* of the > >> proposed BitKeeper licen

Re: Natd+PKT_ALIAS_PUNCH_FW missing something?

1999-10-30 Thread Eivind Eklund
On Sat, Oct 30, 1999 at 05:13:09PM +0200, Rene de Vries wrote: > Hello, > > Am I missing something? I modified natd.c so an extra option was available to > turn on punch firewall (see diff below). When I activated this option it did > not seem to work (ftp-data is still blocked by my firewall). W

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/ftp Makefile fetch.c ftp.1 ftp.c ftp_var.h main.c util.c

1999-07-01 Thread Eivind Eklund
On Thu, Jul 01, 1999 at 03:03:12PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Thu, Jul 01, 1999 at 01:51:24PM +0200, Eivind Eklund wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 01, 1999 at 04:33:37AM -0700, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > >

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/ftp Makefile fetch.c ftp.1 ftp.c ftp_var.h main.c util.c

1999-07-01 Thread Eivind Eklund
On Thu, Jul 01, 1999 at 03:03:12PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Ruslan Ermilov writes: > > On Thu, Jul 01, 1999 at 01:51:24PM +0200, Eivind Eklund wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 01, 1999 at 04:33:37AM -0700, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > > - separate the pftp and

Re: KLD bt848 driver and vm_page_alloc_contig

1999-06-11 Thread Eivind Eklund
On Fri, Jun 11, 1999 at 01:55:04PM +0100, Roger Hardiman wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a way to fix > vm_page_alloc_contig() > so it can allocate contiguous memory once userland has got up > and running and memory has been fragmented/filled. John Dyson answered this about 2 years ago with something

Re: a two-level port system? (fwd)

1999-06-03 Thread Eivind Eklund
On Thu, Jun 03, 1999 at 03:49:49AM -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > > of useless. It's like doing uphill testing of a fat guy on a bicycle > > against a Lamborghini - you "know" the result beforehand. > > Unfortunately, what you're probably not aware of is that the fat guy > also has a JATO unit st

Re: a two-level port system? (fwd)

1999-06-02 Thread Eivind Eklund
On Wed, Jun 02, 1999 at 07:30:43AM -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > I still don't see what the fuss is about in any case since soft > updates would be SLOWER than the async mode I use during installation > and anyone who's actually bothered to benchmark extraction of files > with the two systems know

Re: a two-level port system? (fwd)

1999-05-31 Thread Eivind Eklund
On Tue, Jun 01, 1999 at 12:28:11AM -0500, David Scheidt wrote: > On Tue, 1 Jun 1999, Eivind Eklund wrote: > > > (3) Hit jkh with a baseball bat until he stops refusing to use soft > > updates on the boot floppy during install (due to "making a point") > &

Re: a two-level port system? (fwd)

1999-05-31 Thread Eivind Eklund
On Mon, May 31, 1999 at 02:06:22PM +0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > Now, the problems are: > > > > @ It takes a long time to...what? cvsup the tree? That's already > > to install the port distribution. it's the slowest part of the install > process. developers may not experience that, but all ot

Re: a two-level port system?

1999-05-31 Thread Eivind Eklund
On Tue, Jun 01, 1999 at 01:21:46AM +1000, Andrew Kenneth Milton wrote: > 'Harder' is an awkward word, it has too many meanings in this context. > One meaning says that any extra exertion required rules out the change, > one meaning says that extra complexity rules out the change. I'm not > sure whi

Re: a two-level port system?

1999-05-31 Thread Eivind Eklund
On Mon, May 31, 1999 at 01:02:50PM +0200, Andrzej Bialecki wrote: > Folks, how about _admitting_ finally that our ports collection is a > database? We wouldn't need anything else than standard system tools to > maintain a ports.db file containing all that we want as DB records. Rule #1: Any change

Re: Darren Reed memorial ?

1999-05-26 Thread Eivind Eklund
On Wed, May 26, 1999 at 03:13:28AM +1000, Darren Reed wrote: > In some mail from Mike Smith, sie said: > > > > > I tried to build a kernel with it in, although I don't know if I got > > > the config correct, but I got a panic when it booted, toward the end > > > of the configuration process: > > >