In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Lou Kamenov writes:
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 09:19:10 -0500, Michael W. Lucas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 12:38:43PM +0100, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
But the mere existence of even a basic regression test would be a
start and would encourage people
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jeremie Le Hen writes:
A little time ago, phk@ asked for people to submit regression tests for
virtual filesystem like this [1]. AFAIK, nobody submitted even one test
so far. This could be a good starting point to have unionfs work
correctly again. However, I
At the risk of bringing up the L word on this forum :-), we have a fan-out
unionfs implementation for Linux that doesn't explode very easily. See
http://www.filesystems.org/project-unionfs.html
Cheers,
Erez.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Matthew Dillon writes:
[...]
I would ask two things though:
* First, please add comprehensive /* */ comments in front of each
vfsnop_*() procedure explaining what it does, why it returns what
it returns, locking requirements (if any)
In message 199908261727.kaa23...@apollo.backplane.com, Matthew Dillon writes:
[...]
I would ask two things though:
* First, please add comprehensive /* */ comments in front of each
vfsnop_*() procedure explaining what it does, why it returns what
it returns,
5 matches
Mail list logo
