Re: AMD64 qemu completely broken?

sn't it a virtual network jack, where you can plug into your cable? ;-) -- Frank Behrens, Osterwieck, Germany PGP-key 0x5B7C47ED on public servers available. ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/

Re: indent(1) support for gcc(1) 0b prefix

sequence of 0 and 1 digits." -- Frank Behrens, Osterwieck, Germany PGP-key 0x5B7C47ED on public servers available. ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: Is it possible to use IPv4 and IPv6 in a same jail?

lution. But there is hope. :-) http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4644773E.60909 Gruß, Frank -- Frank Behrens, Osterwieck, Germany PGP-key 0x5B7C47ED on public servers available. ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebs

Re: [RFE] dhclient(8) should send hostname

Frank Behrens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 18 Mar 2006 11:26: > Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 17 Mar 2006 11:20: > > > >On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 04:02:17PM +0100, Frank Behrens wrote: > > > >>I propose a change, that dhclient sends always the cu

jail(8) should not set login name for session

for this mail: Should jail(8) create a new session via setsid(2) if the argument "-l" is supplied? BTW: The mentioned PR has Confidential set to yes. I don't know where it comes from, may be I become mad. :-( Regards, Frank -- Frank Behrens, Osterwieck, Germany PGP-key 0x5B7

Re: [RFE] dhclient(8) should send hostname

Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 17 Mar 2006 11:20: > > >On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 04:02:17PM +0100, Frank Behrens wrote: > > >>I propose a change, that dhclient sends always the current hostname > > >>to the server, the value can be overwritten in

[RFE] dhclient(8) should send hostname

without discussion is in many cases useless. Regards, Frank -- Frank Behrens, Osterwieck, Germany PGP-key 0x5B7C47ED on public servers available. dhclienthostname.diff Description: Binary data ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.f

Re: How disable attachment of sio(4) driver to device?

want to use it. It worked well for me for some years with FreeBSD-4.2 and yesterday I updated my other machine to newest 6.0 and went into "production" with my new driver. -- Frank Behrens, Osterwieck, Germany PGP-key 0x5B7C47ED on public servers available. __

Re: How disable attachment of sio(4) driver to device?

if this is the better solution... Regards, Frank -- Frank Behrens, Osterwieck, Germany PGP-key 0x5B7C47ED on public servers available. ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubsc

Re: How disable attachment of sio(4) driver to device?

a specified resource is in current FreeBSD more complicated compared to FreeBSD 4.x 2. I will create a PR to change the sio(4) driver, that it returns BUS_PROBE_DEFAULT instead of BUS_PROBE_SPECIFIC. Then further patching is not necessary. Thanks for your suggestions. Regards, Frank -

How disable attachment of sio(4) driver to device?

did miss some important information, e.g. I could not find how the associations between PCI selectors (pciconf(8)) and device numers are made and what to insert in device.hints to modify this associations. Regards, Frank -- Frank Behrens, Osterwieck, Germany PGP-key 0x

Re: My experience with cpufreq in -STABLE

ds, Frank -- Frank Behrens, Osterwieck, Germany PGP-key 0x5B7C47ED on public servers available. ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: My experience with cpufreq in -STABLE

Bruno Ducrot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 4 Apr 2005 19:17: > On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 06:45:17PM +0200, Frank Behrens wrote: > > 3. I want to ask the question: Are there are other, more > > sophisticated programs to control the current cpu frequency? > > You may st

My experience with cpufreq in -STABLE

to control the current cpu frequency? 4. If desired I could release the sources for my control daemon, may be for inclusion in the base system? That requires that I beautify the sources a little bit, but that should not be a problem. Best regards, Frank -- Frank Behrens, Osterwieck, Germ