On 08/10/12 18:49, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Try to ktrace the binaries to see what is going on. I suspect that
sources for 1.1.5 are not in our cvs/svn, so it is troublesome to
say anuthing without ktrace dump.
Not that I need it, but I looked to see how old we go.
(Sometimes its nice to have ol
On 07/10/12 21:53, George Mitchell wrote:
On 07/02/12 16:29, Doug Barton wrote:
On 07/02/2012 04:12, George Mitchell wrote:
I've been using IPv6 for quite a few years without problems and I've
had no difficulty browsing
Many more sites are actually putting, or have put, IPv6 into
On 07/02/12 16:29, Doug Barton wrote:
On 07/02/2012 04:12, George Mitchell wrote:
I've been using IPv6 for quite a few years without problems and I've
had no difficulty browsing
Many more sites are actually putting, or have put, IPv6 into production
since the latest world IPv6 day
the Principle of Least Astonishment for me in many
years. And discovering it just when I'm having trouble downloading
packages would be salt in the wound.-- George Mitchell
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://li
With both firefox and chrome, if I browse to
http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/teams/bos
the computer hangs forever "Waiting for l.yimg.com". If I browse to
http://dvd.netflix.com/, the computer hangs forever "Waiting for
cdn-0.nflxing.com".
I've been using IPv6 for quite a few years without problems
On 06/22/12 11:48, VDR User wrote:
[...]
NTSC is not a stream of bits. NTSC is analog. The tuner converts
the NTSC analog waveform into a raw stream of bits. This raw
stream of bits is too large to conviently store on disk, so it
needs to be compressed/encoded into mpeg or similar. Some
tuners i
NG." (Or SERVERS or whatever dependency you need, or "Stop
just before LOGIN".) -- George Mitchell
Set runlevel by default to 3 , where just like any other system is
multiuser, and provide support in the rc scripts to look at kenv. While
documenting &qu
On 03/02/12 18:06, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi George,
Have you thought about providing schedgraph traces with your
particular workload?
I'm sure that'll help out the scheduler hackers quite a bit.
THanks,
Adrian
I posted a couple back in December but I haven't created any more
recently:
http
On 02/27/12 06:28, Olivier Smedts wrote:
2012/2/27 George Mitchell:
On 02/27/12 05:35, Olivier Smedts wrote:
2012/2/27 George Mitchell:
I finally got around to trying this on a 9.0-STABLE GENERIC kernel, in
the forlorn hope that it would fix SCHED_ULE's poor performance for
intera
On 02/27/12 05:35, Olivier Smedts wrote:
2012/2/27 George Mitchell:
I finally got around to trying this on a 9.0-STABLE GENERIC kernel, in
the forlorn hope that it would fix SCHED_ULE's poor performance for
interactive processes with a full load on interactive processes. It
doesn&#
On 02/26/12 19:32, George Mitchell wrote:
> [...] SCHED_ULE's poor performance for
> interactive processes with a full load on interactive processes. It
^^
Should be "of compute-bound".
> doesn&#x
hope that it would fix SCHED_ULE's poor performance for
interactive processes with a full load on interactive processes. It
doesn't help. -- George Mitchell
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org ma
12 matches
Mail list logo
