Mathew Kanner:
> I would like to note that kldload'ing the sound modules works
>very well and I would prefer that to be standard operating procedure
>for sound.
The issue with kldloading is that you still need PNPBIOS for many
on-board sound devices. Which means that you need to compile your
Daniel O'Connor:
>On Fri, 5 Mar 2004 19:06, Helge Oldach wrote:
>> The issue with kldloading is that you still need PNPBIOS for many
>> on-board sound devices. Which means that you need to compile your own
>> kernel anyway, or don´t you?
>
>I don't think I'
Mathew Kanner:
>On Mar 05, Helge Oldach wrote:
>> Daniel O'Connor:
>> >On Fri, 5 Mar 2004 19:06, Helge Oldach wrote:
>> >> The issue with kldloading is that you still need PNPBIOS for many
>> >> on-board sound devices. Which means that you need to com
Mathew Kanner:
>On Mar 05, Helge Oldach wrote:
>> Mathew Kanner:
>> >On Mar 05, Helge Oldach wrote:
>> case b) "options PNPBIOS" in the kernel config and "kldload snd_pcm" =>
>> pcm isn't recognized, but the other PnP devices show up du
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>Tijl Coosemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I have an old toshiba which also needs PNPBIOS in 4-STABLE and
>> when I tried 5-CURRENT sound just worked. Of course that doesn't say
>> anything about your setup...
>
>PNPBIOS is on by default (and non-optional) in 5.x.
That's gre
Helge Oldach:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>>Tijl Coosemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> I have an old toshiba which also needs PNPBIOS in 4-STABLE and
>>> when I tried 5-CURRENT sound just worked. Of course that doesn't say
>>> anything about your
Mike Tancsa:
>Well, its not totally a bug, but missing functionality that looks
>like is there but is not and is pretty important to keep lossy
>links functioning with IPSEC. My colleague [EMAIL PROTECTED] created
>the patch below that implements net.key.prefered_oldsa when using
Julian Elischer:
>On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Helge Oldach wrote:
>> Mike Tancsa:
>> >Well, its not totally a bug, but missing functionality that looks
>> >like is there but is not and is pretty important to keep lossy
>> >links functioning with
Thierry Herbelot:
>Le Thursday 01 April 2004 09:10, Bjoern A. Zeeb a écrit :
>> what are the implications on running an SMP enabled kernel on a UP
>> machine ?
>>
>> I first thought of things like:
>> - performence (most likely not worth the discussion ?)
>
>I got an improvement with a factor of te
Hi,
I may sound ignorant, but what is wrong with the FreeBSD-native aaccli
utility that can be downloaded from Adaptec (5400s_fbsd_cli_v10.zip)?
I have been using this for some time now with success.
May I suggest to make a port out of this as well?
Helge
Bruce M Simpson:
>Hi,
>
>I'm a FreeBSD
M. Warner Losh:
>I'm contemplating a binary distribution system for some systems that I
>have. I'm ignoring kernel updates for the moment, and concentrating
>on userland deployment.
>
>I'm thinking of doing something like:
>
>make buildworld
>make installworld DESTDIR=/big/disk/freebsd/image
>make
11 matches
Mail list logo
