C. Bergström wrote:
Apologies.. I didn't really expect anyone to know about it. To me the
best way to describe it is similar to gdb, but much cleaner codebase.
Might be more effective to offer this to the llvm community, I would
have thought.
___
Is the ability for pxeboot to load from an HTTP source merged - or due
to be merged?
It was a gsoc from 2007 wasn't it?
James
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe,
Kurt J. Lidl wrote:
This catapults back into the arena of stuff that isn't in the
base system. Not to mention I'm not sure that the Oracle BDB
license would allow bundling in the OS as a binary. I doubt it,
but that's a different bikeshed to paint :-)
Is the LGPL of QDBM and TokyoCabinet
Kip Macy wrote:
he's just plain misinforme
Until we know what he is referring to we can't actually say that.
-Kip
OK he said I could post from our private email so here goes. There were
bits in and around relating to the
Solaris /dev/poll support (and the mechanism's limitations) which
Kip Macy wrote:
Do you have a set of regression tests for libev? It sounds like they
would worth having to regression test kqueue.
I would have thought that libevent and libev should both the checked
against kqueue. Also APR
and everything else that has support. I'm not the author of libev
Any idea what the author of libev is on about here (from
http://pod.tst.eu/http://cvs.schmorp.de/libev/ev.pod):
unsigned int ev_recommended_backends ()
Return the set of all backends compiled into this binary of libev
and also recommended for this platform. This set is often smaller
I'm looking for an operating system that I can use to build some
diskless workstations.
I'd really like to be able to support swapping.
Is it feasible to enable swap to any remote file or remote block device
with FreeBSD - without
risking a deadlock?
Linux seems to be prone to deadlock. I
7 matches
Mail list logo
