Daniel J. O'Connor dar...@dons.net.au wrote:
On 26-Jun-99 Jesus Monroy wrote:
An approach like that can't possibly be sufficient if code has been
written with the assumption that only interrupt-like events or
blocking calls can change things from under it. There is quite
a bit
Wes Peters w...@softweyr.com wrote:
Bill Fumerola wrote:
On 22 Jun 1999, Jesus Monroy wrote:
vi(1) is for whimps
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Lab/1986/viforwhimps.html
As long as you're critiquing people for what you called (paraphrased) a
smiley that made you sound
Ville-Pertti Keinonen w...@iki.fi wrote:
m...@servo.ccr.org (Mike O'Dell) writes:
we published the best Unix SMP paper I've ever seen in Computing
Systems - from the Amdahl guys who did an SMP version of the kernel
by very clever hacks on SPLx() macros to make them spin locks and
a bit of
vi(1) is for whimps
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Lab/1986/viforwhimps.html
---
I'd rather pay for my freedom than live in a bitmapped,
pop-up-happy dungeon like NT.
http://www.performancecomputing.com/features/9809of1.shtml
Mike Smith m...@smith.net.au wrote:
Perhaps this is the wrong list to post this question, but has there been
any work done on a script (similar to what Slackware Linux uses) that
asks the user questions (Do you want to run SCO binaries, etc) and
configures a kernel conf file for them?
this project for whatever they wanted.
[5] The Digital Marshalls are:
Terje Oseberg, programmer extraordinare from SRI
Jonathan Walters, gopher and head pipe cleaner
Jesus Monroy, hack and annoying FreeBSD advocate
---
IN that context, it is the BSD that should be considered,
not the prefix.
http
community could
use this project for whatever they wanted.
[5] The Digital Marshalls are:
Terje Oseberg, programmer extraordinare from SRI
Jonathan Walters, gopher and head pipe cleaner
Jesus Monroy, hack and annoying FreeBSD advocate
---
IN that context, it is the BSD that should be considered
7 matches
Mail list logo
