, 2001 at 07:23:07PM -0700, Joesh Juphland wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have a machine whose primary IDE controller is blown. Only the
>secondary
> > works. So, I connected my single IDe drive as the secondary master, and
> > proceeded to install FreeBSD.
Hello,
I have a machine whose primary IDE controller is blown. Only the secondary
works. So, I connected my single IDe drive as the secondary master, and
proceeded to install FreeBSD.
The install went flawlessly. I installed with the FreeBSD boot manager(the
first choice on that screen of
Vanilla x86 system with two identical scsi disks attached to a single 2940.
Installation is flawless - in custom install, I choose da0 and then da1, one
after the other, to partition. Again, I say, installation goes flawlessly.
When the system boots though, it cannot get past the boot manage
One thing I would like to do as a hobby is start a classic multi-user unix
system and giving out shell accounts to whoever wants one. Not a money
maker, of course, but it would be fun.
My question: does anyone have any comments on using `jail` in a public
environment like this - that is, ins
I am going to be setting up four freeBSD servers as a test environment -
they need to be totally isolated machines. However, I would like to see if
I can do all of this on one server. The choice that comes to mind
immediately is vmware, but since I am required to use all freeBSD, I would
be
I am planning on building a true multi-user system (as opposed to a NFS
server, or a web server, or a mail server) - many people with many shells
will be doing many things.
Two things have been decided:
- it will run freeBSD
- it will be dual processor
-
So what two processors should I
I have two 3com 3c589 10BT pc cards. As vanilla as they come.
In a previous thread, I described how a bit of pccard.conf mumbo jumbo made
it possible for me to get both cards up and running in 4.3-RELEASE. It was
explained to me that pccard.conf is deprecated, and that two pcmcia nics
shoul
>You wouldn't happen to have a portmap_enable="NO" line in your rc.conf,
>would you?
No, I do not. Further, I see 'portmap' in the process list, so it is indeed
running.
--joesh
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http
I cannot mount any of the NFS shares that I share from my server due to a
problem with mountd and RPC.
rc.conf looks like this:
network_interfaces="lo0"
removable_interfaces="wi0"
nfs_server_enable="YES"
nfs_server_flags="-t -u -n 4"
/etc/exports looks like this:
/mp3 myclient
I have th
I am trying to get two identical 3C589 pc cards working simultaneously on my
laptop. This was accomplished with FreeBSD 4.3 by adding lines like this to
/etc/defaults/pccard.conf :
config auto "ep0" 10
config auto "ep1" 15
(everything else for that cards entry is left the same)
However, th
/etc/rc.conf looks like this:
pccard_enable="YES"
pccard_mem="DEFAULT"
pccardd_flags=" -i 10 -i 15"
removable_interfaces="ep0 ep1"
network_interfaces="lo0"
(I have tried with and without that last lo0 line)
and /etc/defaults/pccard.conf looks like this:
config auto "ep0" 10
config auto "ep1"
Ok, so I finally got two identical "ep" cards to come up at the same time
and both work. Thanks.
But when I run:
sysctl -w net.link.ether.bridge=1
Nothing happens. They don't get put in promiscuous mode, and bridging does
not get turned on, even though I have bridging in my kernel.
Can an
/etc/rc.conf looks like this:
pccard_enable="YES"
pccard_mem="DEFAULT"
pccardd_flags=" -i 10 -i 15"
removable_interfaces="ep0 ep1"
/etc/defaults/pccard.conf has this:
io 0x240-0x360
irq 10 15
memory 0xd4000 96k
and I added a second config line to the ep0 line like this:
config auto
You mean in /etc/defaults/pccard.conf ? or in /etc/rc.conf ?
thanks.
>: hostname pccardd[87]: No free configuration for card 3Com Corporation
>
>You need a second config line to the 3com entry.
>
>Warner
>
>To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe
>freebsd-hackers" in
I am trying to run two 3com 3c589 pc-cards in one system. Technically one
is a straight 3c589 and one is 3c589c.
irqs are good, since I can put any one of the two 3c589's into the laptop
along with a wavelan (wi) and both cards show up fine and work.
But when I put two 3c589's in, the first
thank you - this was helpful. One last question - when you say that
bridging cannot work with wi cards because they do not support promiscuous
transmission, this makes me wonder two things:
1. Do you mean the wi driver does not support this, or you mean the actual
physical card itself is lim
Great.
Can I already bridge with an* ? And does this mean that bridging in
general with pc cards is a-ok ?
thanks.
>you WILL be able to bridge with WI cards
>no time estimates though..
>
>
>On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Joesh Juphland wrote:
>
> >
> > Recently on th
Recently on this list someone mentioned that you cannot bridge with the 'wi'
driver. This interests me and I have some questions:
(I am running strictly 4.3-RELEASE, btw)
1. is this just temporary - or will we _never_ be able to bridge with 'wi'
?
2. can I bridge with 'an' (cisco aironet c
Many pcmcia cards that I use have user-updateable firmware - basically a
flash region of some kind that you can update with newer firmwares.
When I want to update these items, I generally stick them in a windows
machine and get the new firmware from the manufacturer and use whatever
program t
19 matches
Mail list logo