R: R: [tcpdump-workers] Re: R: [Ethereal-dev] Re: Fwd: kyxtech: freebsd outsniffed by wintendo !!?!?

Hi. -Messaggio Originale- Da: Michael T. Stolarchuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: Loris Degioanni [EMAIL PROTECTED] Data invio: giovedì 14 dicembre 2000 16.39 Oggetto: Re: R: [tcpdump-workers] Re: R: [Ethereal-dev] Re: Fwd: kyxtech: freebsd outsniffed by wintendo !!?!? ah, but the buffer sizes

R: [tcpdump-workers] Re: Re: [Ethereal-dev] Re: Fwd: kyxtech: freebsd outsniffed by wintendo !!?!?

On 2000-12-08 00:38 -0800, Guy Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (Both FreeBSD and OpenBSD have the maximum buffer size for BPF as 512KB in the top of the CVS tree; NetBSD still has it as 32K.) You can change both the default and maximum BPF buffer sizes at run time (affecting an subsequent

R: [Ethereal-dev] Fwd: kyxtech: freebsd outsniffed by wintendo !!?!?

Hi. I am quite astonished by the interest aroused by our tests a year after their publication on the web. We (the Italians, i.e. the network group of the Politecnico di Torino) performed these tests in November 1999 in order to obtain quantitative results for my graduation thesis that was