Steven Hartland [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wrote,
jctl is not a valid command here, perhaps its a thirdparty addon
you have there?
Steve
# whereis jail
jail: /usr/sbin/jail /usr/share/man/man8/jail.8.gz /usr/src/usr.sbin/jail
Its stock on my machine... Perhaps your path is bad?
compile whatever needs to use it as linux then brandelf it, it
should work
~Neo-Vortex
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Hello hackers,
I'm going to disturb you once again with ProPolice. The original
ProPolice patch, as well as most of FreeBSD variants and Linux one,
uses /dev/urandom to fill the canary with random data (the canary
is what is going to be put
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, ALeine wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Hello hackers,
I'm going to disturb you once again with ProPolice. The
original ProPolice patch, as well as most of FreeBSD variants
and Linux one, uses /dev/urandom to
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, Mike Hunter wrote:
Hey everybody,
I was playing around in ports and came across xroach. Cool program :)
The only problem is that it runs too fast; you can't see the roaches
because they scurry under your windows too quickly.
Is there a general-purpose approach to
On Sun, 5 Jun 2005, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote:
Yes, oh lordie yes. I guess we aren't going to have a new logo in time for
FreeBSD6-RELEASE in August, are we?
Coordinating the release with the new logo would be really nifty!
Mabe im living under a rock... but what new logo?
~NVX
this?)
~Neo-Vortex
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
than Linux for the 300 connection test although better for the
600 and 1000? (Just Curiosity)
~Neo-Vortex
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
(and less prone to errors) by using the inet_addr()
function... half asleep at the moment... will re-look over your actual
question later :)
~Neo-Vortex
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 16:38, M. Parsons wrote:
I was under the impression (but would need to check to make sure) that
all incoming packets are diverted to ng_pppoe when it is hooked into the
Ethernet interface.
This would explain your problems.
Can you try this without the interface being
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
Hi Hackers,
I posted this on freebsd-questions, but couldn't find a solution...
Maybe here
Thank you!
Please: don't Cc me, I'm on the list!
-- Forwarded message --
From: Pietro Cerutti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 17
11 matches
Mail list logo
