Re: MySQL Data_free = 0 Slowness (appending to files slow?)

On Tue, 05 Mar 2013 18:12:19 +0100 Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote: I don't know if you've noticed, but: 1) In your slow case, the load is almost entirely in userspace (USR), i.e. mysql, while in the fast case, the kernel load (SYS) is 5x-6x greater. Unless the first case actually

MySQL Data_free = 0 Slowness (appending to files slow?)

Hackers, I ran into this issue while setting up a performance testing environment with MySQL 5.6/MyISAM tables. I have an arbitrarily sized test table, in this case with a base number of rows over 1 million. When I insert new rows into this table with super-smack, and the on disk table file is

Teaming Network Interfaces

Title: Teaming Network Interfaces Does anyone know of a project or other plans to implement teaming of network interfaces in FreeBSD? Something that will allow two or more NICs share the same IP Address, MAC address, etc. for network fault tolerance purposes? I found nothing in the archives

bridging

Title: bridging Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't bridging of two interfaces supposed to make a duplicate of the traffic from one onto another? Why is it then that on the second interface I bridge to I only see broadcast and multicast packets? I have fxp0 and fxp1 acting as a bridge, fxp0

RE: BPF and Promiscuous Mode

have read nothing about it anywhere else, is there some resource that has every sysctl variable listed with it's purpose? thx nick -Original Message- From: Nick Evans Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2000 12:18 AM To: 'Dan Nelson' Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: BPF and Promiscuous Mode

BPF and Promiscuous Mode

Title: BPF and Promiscuous Mode How do I set an interface in promiscous mode permanently? In Linux it's simply ifconfig interface PROMISC. Is there something similar in BSD? Is it somekind of sysctl command? thx. -- nick.evans network.engineering

RE: BPF and Promiscuous Mode

. -Original Message- From: Dan Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 03, 2000 10:34 PM To: Nick Evans Subject: Re: BPF and Promiscuous Mode Is there any reason you're not CC'ing the list? I added it back on my first reply on the assumption you simply forgot, but this email is missing

Intel Pro/100+ Dual Port Server Adapter and Fault Tolerance

Title: Intel Pro/100+ Dual Port Server Adapter and Fault Tolerance Does anyone know if the FXP driver in 4.0-STABLE supports the AFT Fault Tolerance features of this network card? I know the fault tolerance is set in the driver under WindowsNT but I'm not quite sure whether or not it is