Re: Porting the OpenBSD free Atheros HAL

2004-11-09 Thread Rob Deker
Kris Kennaway wrote: On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 10:35:29AM -0500, Rob Deker wrote: Hi, I was just wondering if anybody was working on porting the new open-source Atheros HAL from OpenBSD to FreeBSD yet. Why would you want to do this? Doesn't it provide a subset of what the FreeBSD driver

Re: Porting the OpenBSD free Atheros HAL

2004-11-09 Thread Rob Deker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You're right, it does. However, myself and collegue recently presented our work in raw Atheros raw frame injection at ToorCon based on the Atheros HAL and Sam's driver/HAL wrapper. If you're familliar with these cards and their current status

Porting the OpenBSD free Atheros HAL

2004-11-08 Thread Rob Deker
Hi, I was just wondering if anybody was working on porting the new open-source Atheros HAL from OpenBSD to FreeBSD yet. If not I'm willing to take a stab at it, but I don't want to duplicate efforts already underway. If anybody is working on this already and could use any help, etc. drop me a

Parameters passed to ath_hal_setuptxdesc() from ath(4)

2004-09-14 Thread Rob Deker
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey folks, ~I've recently been working on some patches to the ath(4) driver to allow for raw frame injection, and I've got a question. Our patches will be allowing for full-frame raw injection, and so we can't necessarily know the length of the

Re: Parameters passed to ath_hal_setuptxdesc() from ath(4)

2004-09-14 Thread Rob Deker
On Tue, 2004-09-14 at 19:21, Sam Leffler wrote: ~ - Is this a function of the HAL? hardware (but only 5210 parts need it). ~ - If so, does the header length parameter to ath_hal_setuptxdesc() tell the HAL how many bytes it needs to send at a slower rate? ~ - If the answers to the

The continued remote debugging saga...

2004-09-01 Thread Rob Deker
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 So, after a lot of work and help from folks here, I've gotten remote gdb functioning (thanks again to those who helped. In the end there was a bad cable in the mix that was the final screw-up). Now I have one other question/problem. I've got cuaa0 on

Re: The continued remote debugging saga...

2004-09-01 Thread Rob Deker
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 John-Mark Gurney wrote: | If you are able to be at a command line, you could try: sysctl | debug.kdb.current=ddb | If I was able to get to a command line, I'd just use shutdown :) Could I build up the appropriate struct in gdb and use the sysctl()

Serial consoles and remote GDB

2004-08-29 Thread Rob Deker
Hi folks, New to the list, so please bear with me if this is a question that's been answered someplace before. I've been searching and can't seem to find an answer. I'm doing some driver hacking w/ FreeBSD 5.2.1 and I've hit a spot where my life would be much easier if I had remote GDB for

Re: Serial consoles and remote GDB

2004-08-29 Thread Rob Deker
On Sun, 2004-08-29 at 18:55, Stephan Uphoff wrote: Hi, Try the patch from kern/65278 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/65278 Thanks, Looks like that did some good (I have my console back now), but when i either boot -g or break into ddb and give it a gdb command, then try