Wed Oct 20 21:32:58 2004
|--- sys/i386/include/bus_at386.h Sat Nov 11 11:11:00 2000
--
File to patch: ^C
--
Deomid Ryabkov aka Rojer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 8025844
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org ma
Scott Long wrote:
I wonder if that's the whole trick here. Would someone be willing to
try the attached patch instead of the one that Ian posted?
just tried the patch... no, it doesn't help.
stalls still happen when reading large files from the device.
--
Deomid Ryabkov aka Ro
://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=usb/81621)
the original submitter seems to have VIA controller too.
--
Deomid Ryabkov aka Rojer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 8025844
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
e more info and maybe even a
short-term
remote ssh/serial console access.
--
Deomid Ryabkov aka Rojer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 8025844
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Amandeep Pannu wrote:
2) It doesnt detect the broadcom interfaces.
They are
Broadcom BCM5721 PCI Express GbE.
the support is in -STABLE already, update to latest RELENG_5.
--
Deomid Ryabkov aka Rojer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 8025844
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic
installed Linux on those and all has been going well since that...
the point is: PAE and large memory configurations in general need more testing.
--
Deomid Ryabkov aka Rojer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 8025844
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
into the issue here... thanks everyone :)
[Haven't read your code]
Try to turn net.inet.ip.portrange.randomized off.
yes, this does solve the problem on 4.10-STABLE.
thanks, Maxim :)
mink[/home/rojer]# uname -rms
FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE i386
mink[/home/rojer]# ./x.pl
24045, http://localhost:8000/junk, 2
erver" process, which would then
hang around servicing stuff for some time.
There don't seem to be better alternatives for doing this securely
and still keep reasonable *NIX-like behavior.
this is no good either... overhead would bring down our servers right away.
--
Deomid Ryabkov aka
. I assume that process cannot change its .text section once
loaded so this scheme would no be abused by overwriting the location
with malicious code. Am I correct here? What do you think of this scheme
overall?
Thank you.
--
Deomid Ryabkov aka Rojer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IC
9 matches
Mail list logo