Re: Snapshots mtime seems to be getting updated

2005-06-02 Thread Steve Roome
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 06:37:08PM +0200, Marc Olzheim wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 03:41:15PM +0100, Steve Roome wrote: > > # Check that SNAPFILE can be created/deleted > > > > mksnap_ffs $MOUNT $SNAPFILE && MD_DEV=`mdconfig -a -t vnode -f $SNAPFILE` > >

Snapshots mtime seems to be getting updated

2005-06-01 Thread Steve Roome
I'm using to do this. I'm not really interested in ways to fix this script, though there are probably many better ways to do this, right now I'm just unsure if this is the correct behavious for snapshots. Thanks in advance if anyone knows what's going on here, Steve Roome P.S.

Re: Tagged Command Queuing support for IC-35L0?0 ?

2001-09-04 Thread Steve Roome
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 07:20:30PM +0200, Niek Bergboer wrote: > Can these newer drives, based on the IC-35L0?0-chipset, also be used > with TCQ enabled in FBSD? (? is 2, 4 or 6 depending on whether the > drive has 20, 40 or 60 GB capacity). I've got one of these : ad0: 39266MB [79780/16/63] at

Re: Should URL's be pervasive.

2001-09-02 Thread Steve Roome
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 03:34:09PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 11:21:09PM +0100, Steve Roome wrote: > > ping http://www.myserver.wherever/ > > instead of telnet wherever 80, just to see if I get a connected or > > not ? > > Do you have

Re: Should URL's be pervasive.

2001-08-30 Thread Steve Roome
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 11:17:08AM -0400, Keith Stevenson wrote: > Ick. If I wanted this kind of integration I would run Windows, KDE, or GNOME > instead of my nice, stable, predictable, lightweight desktop environment. This entire email is very IMHO Why? a URI is by name a "Uniform Resource Loc

Re: function calls/rets in assembly

2001-08-26 Thread Steve Roome
e docs I've read, leave takes longer than a mov and return ? Steve Roome To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

function calls/rets in assembly

2001-08-23 Thread Steve Roome
t gcc -S comes out with is mad.. e.g. my functions start addl $12, %esp subl $-8, %esp Which if I change to : addl $12, %esp causes a segfault.. (is that obvious, it doesn't seem to be ?) Last time I did any large amount of assembly it was on the ARM, 10 years ago, so please excuse my ign

bin/22124

2001-02-15 Thread Steve Roome
stall FreeBSD and not knowing which devices were which. I'm sure someone will tell me they don't like the way it's done and I could put the data in tables instead of switch statements, but whatever, just wondered if there was a chance of some feedback on it? Thanks in advance,