Says right there.
http://alec.mooo.com/mpx.html
Followed the instructions in the link.
Second part will have more info.
Thanks much and apologies.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?p=228128
http://www.dolphinburger.com/cgi-bin/bsdi-man?proto=1.1&query=ps_strings&msection=5&apropos=0
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina <
cjpug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi people,
>
> Despite I made a request not long ago[1], I'm
Calm down for a minute. There are people who work with embedded systems on
the different mailing lists. Think about things first. You were given some
suggestions in that thread. The problem is convincing the embedded market
and not those who maintain FreeBSD.
You need the hardware along with the s
I haven't done much messing with scheduling. It is set at the default ULE
for this machine.
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 25 July 2013 02:51, Wojciech Puchar
> wrote:
> >> improved with a higher kern.hz rating. Unless the future holds an
> emu20k2,
> >> there will
getting enough time to run? etc.
>
>
>
> -adrian
>
> On 24 July 2013 15:35, Super Bisquit wrote:
> >
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2009-September/051789.html
> >
> > This is the thread that I was referring to earlier. Since the patch is
> for
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2009-September/051789.html
This is the thread that I was referring to earlier. Since the patch is for
2009, what are the chances it would work with 10.x or 9.x?
On PowerPC machines with a low MHz rate- or any machine with a CPU rate of
800 MHz or
At 2500 Hz, the tick rate increases by 1 Hz per cycle. There was mention of
a patch that would allow the rate to be as high as 40k without this effect.
--I'll post the link as soon as I find the mailing list thread--
Will this patch work with the current available releases?
In the case of firmware loaded systems, all of them aren't going to work
with a single boot loader.
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Teske, Devin wrote:
>
> On May 28, 2013, at 8:54 AM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> On 5/28/13 7:49 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
> On 05/27/13 23:36, Alfred Perlstein
May I- and others- see the hyperlink to the project,
please?
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 11:45 PM, Teske, Devin wrote:
>
> On May 25, 2013, at 7:51 PM, Super Bisquit wrote:
>
> > Please don't turn this into an architecture dependent mess. PCBSD is
> i386 &
> > A
Please don't turn this into an architecture dependent mess. PCBSD is i386 &
AMD64 only.
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Dirk Engling wrote:
> On 26.05.13 01:07, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
>
> > I'm not aware of any movement there (on either side of the table). I'd
> > personally be very suspiciou
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=89377+0+archive/2008/freebsd-java/20080203.freebsd-java
is the template given for me to follow.
I have Debian running on an iMac G4 and FreeBSD running on a QuickSilver G4.
1. The assumption is that the script is ran on the iMac. Considering
that SSH be
"Energizer Bunny" is more threatening.
On 3/13/12, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
>
> http://modcult.org/read/2008/2/20/nakatomi-socrates-bsd-9-2
> ___
> freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
> To
CPU architecture and model have a lot to do with performance.
You will also get different results if you used qemu in place of
VirtualBox. Qemu allows you to choose different emulated
architectures, CPUs, and machine bases. What's the downside? You have
to use the command line.
Install qemu and run
The individual maintainers of each architecture have the right to make
a "PRE-RELEASE" of the system at any time. Come to think of it,
anyone who can has that right- that is to make a pre-release.
On 2/18/12, Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 09:45:47PM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
>> 1. In
I'd be willing to try building it on the Power(PC) platform.
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Eric McCorkle wrote:
> Given that NVidia is releasing the CUDA platform source on a limited
> basis, is anyone actively working to port it to FreeBSD? The reason I
> ask is that to get access to the so
Let the individual know that the gnome developers are willing to work with him.
For gnome desktop devel, here's the link and project:
http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/project/google/gsoc2011/kulakovad/4001
On 4/29/11, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
> On 29.04.2011 23:30, Super Bisqu
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=648430
It doesn't seem that there was any before this willing to submit a bug
report about networking.
The gnome developers are willing to work with the freebsd project.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing
Apologies; but, he can get more help from one of the two of you before
he can get any from the FreeBSD hacker mailing list.
On 4/3/11, Super Bisquit wrote:
> Why don't you ask Whitehorn or other members of the FreeBSD PowerPC
> team this question. Very few of the hackers deal wi
Why don't you ask Whitehorn or other members of the FreeBSD PowerPC
team this question. Very few of the hackers deal with anything outside
of standard i386 and AMD64 platforms.
nwhiteh...@freebsd.org
chmeeed...@gmail.com Justin Hibbits
On 4/3/11, Andreas Tobler wrote:
> Hello all,
>
>
I'm just going to clarify a statement I made earlier on this thread in order
to remove some possible misconceptions. One can only boot 32bit PPC on a
32bit PPC machines and have it work properly. The same applies for 64bit ppc
machines.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Julien Laffaye wrote:
> O
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 4:59 PM, wrote:
> Now, how are you going to multiboot OpenBSD and NetBSD on a PowerPC
>>
> machine
>
>> from the same hard disk.
>>
>
> I didn't say anything about a requirement for booting multiple OSes
from the same disk. I said:
Go through all the disks and look
>>
work.
It won't work on sparc (64/ultra), and it won't work on arm.
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Super Bisquit
> wrote:
> > The ppc 32bit series does not boot directly into the boot loader prompt.
> You
> &g
Now, how are you going to multiboot OpenBSD and NetBSD on a PowerPC machine
from the same hard disk. From what I know, one or the other can only be as
the first entry and it then has to be set from the forth prompt.
So, you will need two disks to boot , saya: OpenBSD, NetBSD, FreeBSD, Linux,
and Ma
And what if I need to boot into single user mode?
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Devin Teske wrote:
> Hi fellow hackers,
>
> I'm designing an open-sourced replacement boot-loader for FreeBSD. I feel
> that the existing options in the boot-loader menu today can be whittled down
> significantly
know the open firmware commands for
switching default graphic slots.
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Nathan Whitehorn
wrote:
> AGP is derived from PCI, so AGP devices show up on the PCI bus. All the AGP
> kernel module does is provide hooks to manipulate some advanced features of
>
behind.
On 1/12/11, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
> On 01/12/11 02:39, Super Bisquit wrote:
>> http://slexy.org/view/s2NSVy7aTU
>>
>> The build also fails looking for machine/specialreg.h. This file is only
>> found on i386/amd64 processors. Drm.ko is needed by agp.ko.
The last email I sent stated that the drm kernel module could not be built
because specialreg.h is an i386 only function.
I am also aware that the agp module needs drm to run. Why did I ask for
help? The PowerMac G4 Quicksilver has an agp graphics slot. I also know that
OpenFirmware is related to O
http://slexy.org/view/s2NSVy7aTU
The build also fails looking for machine/specialreg.h. This file is only
found on i386/amd64 processors. Drm.ko is needed by agp.ko.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/f
FreeBSD SNAPSHOT-9 from people.freebsd.org/~nwhitehorn not ppc64. In the
directories of /usr/src/sys/modules/drm/ and of
/usr/src/sys/modules/drm/radeon the build breaks with specialeg.h not found.
Using find -f /|grep specialreg.h only leaves me with
/usr/src/sys/(x86-variant)/include/speialreg.h.
29 matches
Mail list logo
