> * malathi selvaraj wrote:
>> i am new one to freeBSD, kindly guide me
>
> Sure. In order to be eligible to use FreeBSD, you must buy a license
> for
> $ 100,-. I expect this money to be transferred to my bank account as
> soon as possible. The IBAN number is:
>
> NL30ABNA0385823426
>
Yo
Here is a link to a mailing list post about a patch to give dummynet
support in pf. It is _fairly_ recent and so may still be a little
buggy, but the poster seems quite confident that it works as
intended.
http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd...@freebsd.org/msg03857.html
Cheers, Tim.
> On 2009-0
> What file on FreeBSD acts like autoexec.bat?
> Also please leave the full path%
> ___
> freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
>Fr
> On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 7:14 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> To who it may concern,
>>
>> I am A FreeBSD administrator as well as a Solaris Administrator.
>> I use
>> BSD at home but Solaris at work. I love both OS's but I would like
>> to
>> increase the administrative capability of FreeBSD
> Hi all,
>
> Does anyone know if there are any IPv6 CVS servers for FreeBSD? (As
> in
> receiving the STABLE and ports branches) I currently use
> cvs.freebsd.org but
> it dosent have an record.
>
> Ta
>
> Peg
> dig cvsup4.freebsd.org
; <<>> DiG 9.4.2 <<>> cvsup4.freebsd.org
;
>
> Hello,
>
> I've posted the attached mail in the IP Filter mailing list; the
> only
> responses have been bad configured vacation replies :-(
>
> someone from freebsd-hackers has an idea? thanks in advance
>
> matthias
>
> - Forwarded message from Matthias Apitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --
> Can you please cc: the mailinglist? Thanks.
>
> -On [20080714 15:36], Andres Chavez ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
>>postfix/postfix-script: warning: not owned by group maildrop:
>> /usr/sbin/
>>postdrop
>>
>>postfix/postfix-script: warning: not set-gid or not
>> owner+group+world
>>executable: /u
> Robert Watson wrote:
>> On Thu, 3 Jul 2008, Lothar Braun wrote:
>>
>>> Robert Watson wrote:
>>>
My primary concern about some of these replacement installer
projects
is that they've placed a strong focus on making them graphical
-- I
actually couldn't care less about GUI
Hi there,
In case you haven't heard yet, ICANN have unanimously voted their
approval to expand the domain name character set to include Asian,
Middle Eastern, Eastern European and Russian character sets in
domain names. In addition, top level domains will have their
restrictions removed, ie any no
Hi there,
Installing 7.0 via PXE has a slight problem that is easily worked around. The
file /boot/mfsroot.gz on the installation media needs to be unzipped to make
PXE boot via tftp/nfs work. Otherwise the loader ultimately complains that it
cant find the device to boot from. For example, if you
--- Dimitry Andric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008-02-23 02:08, Atom Smasher wrote:
> > article below. does anyone know how this affects eli/geli?
> >
> > from the geli man page: "detach - Detach the given providers, which means
> > remove the devfs entry and clear the keys from memory." d
--- Pieter de Boer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>
> > It's interesting that you classified this as a "feature" (in quotes),
> > because there's nothing "modern" about said "feature". This issue has
> > existed since the beginning of RAM chip engineering; I can even confir
--- KAYVEN RIESE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> i have been told that freeBSD does not go well with
> flash plugins for browsers, which is quite a ubiquitous
> technology in websites. is there any progress on this?
> i have freeBSD 6.2-STABLE and gnome desktop
>
Hi there, I have native firef
--- David Naylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The question first: init does allow a chroot before booting the system
> however
> does it allow the first device to be unmounted and use the new chroot as the
> root device. If it does how can that be achieved.
>
> My motivation for th
--- Thomas Sparrevohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 28 June 2007 14:44:05 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > --- Thomas Sparrevohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> > ...
> >
> > >
> > > I have Vista Home edition ruinning any FreeBSD without any problems and
> > > without having to d
--- Bakul Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Having thought this over some more, if a
> > shred/scramble/scrub command is created in its own
> > right, then a number of new features could be
> added
> > that do not currently exist.
>
> > - The command could be writen to protect a single
> > fi
ack that calls
> "shred" and returns with error every time the latter
> does.
>
> These are my 1.99 cents.
>
>
> - Daniel
>
>
> - Original Message
> From: Tim Clewlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Bakul Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
--- Bakul Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry if I tuned in late:-)
>
> I vote for taking *out* -P. It is an ill-designed
> feature.
> Or if you keep it, also add it to mv, cp -f & ln -f
> since
> these commands can also unlink a file and once
> unlinked in
> this matter you can't scrub it
18 matches
Mail list logo
