AN> Would it be possible to use sendfile in tftpd?
AN> With an Athlon XP 1600+ I could only get ~40 Mbps out from the machine
AN> with 0% idle CPU time (large file transfers from many machines, getting
AN> the same file).
No, sendfile() is only for TCP connections, TFTP is using UDP. If you
want
Saturday, December 29, 2001, 6:41:33 PM, you wrote:
JK> On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 07:27:36PM +0100, Tomas Svensson wrote:
>> ## several packets are lost here due to congestion, thanks to
>> TCP_NODELAY:
JK> No. These packets aren't lost to congestion. I can reproduce
This just verifies what I said weeks ago.
On the client side:
## several packets are lost here due to congestion, thanks to
TCP_NODELAY:
15:28:09.879928 transwarp.tao.org.uk.telnet > genius.tao.org.uk.kpop: P 609:641(32)
ack 64 win 33304
15:28:09.881926 transwarp.tao.org.uk.telnet > genius.tao
I am not using compression and netstat -s confirms that it is really
resending data. I examined it a bit more now and it seems OpenSSH 2.5 is
sending a burst of small packets, each with 100 or 116 bytes
14:30:46.232151 server.22 > client.1525: P 30977:31077(100) ack 1144 win 24820
14:30:46.23335
JK> Is this the same problem that I experience on ssh connections between
JK> my 5.0-current laptop and my releng_4 server? When I run an 'ls'
JK> from the shell on large directories I get the response back block
JK> delay block delay block. I assumed that it was a problem with
JK> -current.
I
5 matches
Mail list logo
