Re: amdtemp need help with testing

On 2013-10-09 13:34, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: On 2013-10-07 3:24, rozhuk...@gmail.com wrote: I updated amdtemp and now I need your help with testing. Now the driver should support all AMD processors. For a family of 15h and 16h, not all sensors are available - for my system does not find

Re: amdtemp need help with testing

On 2013-10-07 3:24, rozhuk...@gmail.com wrote: I updated amdtemp and now I need your help with testing. Now the driver should support all AMD processors. For a family of 15h and 16h, not all sensors are available - for my system does not find drivers for ati SMBus, and other systems based on the

Re: Failsafe on kernel panic

On 17-1-2013 4:18, Ian Lepore wrote: > On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 23:27 +0200, Sami Halabi wrote: >> Thank you for your response, very helpful. >> one question - how do i configure auto-reboot once kernel panic occurs? >> >> Sami >> > > From src/sys/conf/NOTES, this may be what you're looking for... >

Re: request for testers - xen support for domU in head

Kip Macy wrote: Basic Xen support for 32-bit in PAE mode is in CVS. Please see the wiki for general information: http://wiki.freebsd.org/FreeBSD/Xen Please be forewarned that I am not claiming that this is production-ready. There are many known limitations. If you would like to take it for a te

Re: Very low disk performance Highpoint 1820a

Steven Hartland wrote: Still I would argue that if you do not use a write size larger than what you have as real memory, that buffering in real memory is going to play a role I think you miss read all the details here Willem. Sorry about that, if that is the case. Original values: Write: 150

Re: Very low disk performance Highpoint 1820a

Steven Hartland wrote: If that where the case it would have been it wouldn't have been 46Mb/s it would have been 543Mb/s, just tested it for you :P I've just finished putting together a new server box spec: Dual AMD 244, 2GB ram, 5 * Seagate SATA 400GB on a Highpoint 1820a RAID 5 array. 5.4-STABLE

Re: Very low disk performance Highpoint 1820a

Steven Hartland wrote: I've just finished putting together a new server box spec: Dual AMD 244, 2GB ram, 5 * Seagate SATA 400GB on a Highpoint 1820a RAID 5 array. 5.4-STABLE Highpoint 1820a RAID 5 ( 5 disk ) . 65536 bytes transferred in 13.348032 secs (49097875 bytes/sec) You're only transferi

Re: vinum vs. DPT smartcacheIV raid

Peter C. Lai wrote: I have a box with DPT PM2044 SmartCacheIV UW-SCSI PCI cards which can do RAID-5 in hardware, but I'd have to use the DOS volume manager to set up the array. I have heard reports that vinum woudl be faster than using the native card. Is this true? Should I not bother with doin

Re: Devilator - performance monitoring for FreeBSD

Andrew J Caines wrote: I'd also vouch for collecting orcallator data using rsync over ssh from the client systems to the cruching and report generating server. Wait until you would like to do a larger server park. Then you start running into performance issues because you nee to setup a full ssh/t

Re: Devilator - performance monitoring for FreeBSD

Harti Brandt wrote: On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Robert Watson wrote: RW> RW>On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Borja Marcos wrote: RW> RW>> I'm not sure about the correct values in the process description RW>> to get a picture as accurate as possible of the cpu usage of different RW>> processes. I've seen that top uses

Re: Dumps with more than 4gig.

David Gilbert wrote: Did someone submit a patch that fixes dumps in excess of 4 Gig on arches like amd64? About half a year ago I had some discussion on am64 when I was not able to dump th kernel when having 2GB of memory... That got fixed, and after some talks a different solution was chosen bec

Re: Multiple Bootable FreeBSD partitions?

> >Not to blow my own horn, but: > > > >http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2002/05/09/Big_Scary_Daemons.html > > > > > If you have a time and you would like to run current, release, stable > and extra > a few OS, Install *Linux and use extended partition(slice for BSD guys) > and Grub, and you can r

Re: Multiple Bootable FreeBSD partitions?

From: "Stephen Hocking" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I'm looking at creating multiple versions of FreeBSD on the one disk - sharing > perhaps one or two filesystems, but with totally separate /, /usr and /var. > Does anyone have a quick way to do this from a clean install? I've done this > under a number

Re: gdb 6.1.1: File format not recognized

Use gdb6 from the ports. gdb6 -k . --WjW - Original Message - From: "Matthias Schuendehuette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2004 8:36 PM Subject: gdb 6.1.1: File format not recognized > Hello, > > I tried to look into a core dump from

Re: magic symbolic links (ideas/patches?)

Message - From: "Guido van Rooij" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Hackers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 11:55 AM Subject: Re: magic symbolic links (ideas/patches?) > II

Re: Bad memory suspected

does not run on 3*66Mhz. So I'm just running it on: 2.5 * 66. --WjW - Oorspronkelijk bericht - Van: Mike Nowlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Aan: Willem Jan Withagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Verzonden: woensdag 2 februari 2000 8:11 Onderwerp: Re: Bad m

Re: Bad memory suspected

7;ll again check the voltages --WjW Perhaps we should "merge" this thread to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? - Oorspronkelijk bericht - Van: Matthew D. Fuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Aan: Chris Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: Willem Jan Withagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <

Re: Bad memory suspected

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: >Hoi Jan Willem, > >I would tend to agree with Doug White about a "make world" being a good >memory test. However, I suspect Doug has the kind of system that will do a >make world in a minute or two. I too agree with Doug. It is what causes me to ask this

Bad memory suspected

Hi, Being probably bitten again by some bad memory, I'm considering applying some of my old (VLSI) testingskills to this. However. I'm in dire need of some hints, some because I haven't kept up with the intimate details of Intel hardware, nor do I know how to get a lineair memory space for a

Re: devices in sysctl MIB?

Something like below? That is what you get available when running ucd-snmp. So I guess that a lot of the data is already available. Just not in sysctl (yet) -_WjW interfaces.ifNumber.0 = 6 interfaces.ifTable.ifEntry.ifIndex.1 = 1 interfaces.ifTable.ifEntry.ifIndex.2 = 2 interfaces.ifTable.ifEntry

Re: Pictures from USENIX

In article <19990704112426.j...@freebie.lemis.com> you write: >On Saturday, 3 July 1999 at 17:28:51 -0700, John Polstra wrote: >> I put a handful of pictures from this year's USENIX conference at >> . > >Hey, they're some of the best I've seen of USENIX. P

Re: devices in sysctl MIB?

Something like below? That is what you get available when running ucd-snmp. So I guess that a lot of the data is already available. Just not in sysctl (yet) -_WjW interfaces.ifNumber.0 = 6 interfaces.ifTable.ifEntry.ifIndex.1 = 1 interfaces.ifTable.ifEntry.ifIndex.2 = 2 interfaces.ifTable.ifEntr

Re: Pictures from USENIX

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: >On Saturday, 3 July 1999 at 17:28:51 -0700, John Polstra wrote: >> I put a handful of pictures from this year's USENIX conference at >> . > >Hey, they're some of the best I've seen of USENIX. Proves my statement

Re: Variant symlinks [was Re: symlink question]

In article <53425.929320...@zippy.cdrom.com> you write: >> And have /usr/bin point to /binaries/i386/bin or /binaries/mips/bin > >And before people jump on me, let me just clarify in advance that I >was not meaning to imply that Apollo ever used the x86 architecture. >They didn't. It was just an e

Re: symlink question

In article you write: > >Sorry if I'm bothering you busy folk unnecessarily... > >If I wanted to add variant symlinks, would that just require modifications >to namei, or is that way too simplistic? I've done that part with help of Mike Smith and others. I still have the changes around somewhere