Hello,
I tested HP DL 585 (16 CPUs, w/ built-in Broadcom NICs) running FreeBSD 7.1
Beta2 under heavy network traffic (TCP).
SCENARIO A : Bombarded w/ TCP traffic:
When net.isr.direct=1,
PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND
52 root1 -68- 0
> - Original Message
> From: Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Won De Erick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
> Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 10:16:31 PM
> Subject: Re: NET.ISR and CPU utilization
> - Original Message
> From: Won De Erick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
> Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2008 7:18:46 PM
> Subject: Re: NET.ISR and CPU utilization performance
> - Original Message
> From: Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 5:21:04 AM
> Subject: Re: NET.ISR and CPU utilization performance w/ HP DL 585 using
> FreeBSD 7.1 Beta2
>
> Won De Eric
Hello,
I was trying the assembly language program that is specified in the following
document (p24) to set, reset the built-in watchdog timer for the Boser Box.
http://www.boser.com.tw/manual/HS-7001v1.1.pdf
I then installed nasm in FreeBSD 6.2, and added the following lines at the
beginning.
> - Original Message
> From: Rink Springer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 09:38:51AM +0100, Christoph Mallon wrote:
> > Userland is not allowed to write to ports. That's the bus error you see.
> > Also without a call to the exit syscall at the end, it will segfault.
>
>- Original Message
>From: Christoph Mallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
Won De Erick schrieb:
>>> - Original Message
>>
>>> From: Rink Springer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>
>>>
>> On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 09:38:5
>From: Won De Erick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>From: Christoph Mallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>
>Won De Erick schrieb:
>>>> - Original Message
>>>
>>>> From: Rink Springer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>
>>&
> - Original Message
> From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Christoph Mallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > You're probably better of writing this in C.
maybe i get this as an option.
>
> He's probably better off writing a watchdog(4) driver for the Boser (or
> getting someon
Christoph Mallon wrote:
>
>
Won De Erick schrieb:
>>> - Original Message
>>
>>> From: Rink Springer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>
>>>
>> On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 09:38:51AM +0100, Christoph Mallon wrote:
>>>> Userland is
Hi All,
I'm not quite familiar with FreeBSD, but I want to do the following in 6.2/7.1.
/* Raise IOPL to 3 to open all I/O ports */
/* something like 'i386_iopl(3)' */
...
/* Open SMRAM access */
outl(unsigned int port, unsigned long int data);
Also, I appreciate comments on the fo
--- On Fri, 3/27/09, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 27/03/2009 12:35 Ivan Voras said
> the following:
> > Takanori Watanabe wrote:
> >> In message <17314.10813...@web45811.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>,
> Won De Erick wrote:
> >>> Hi All,
> >>>
> >&g
--- On Fri, 3/27/09, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 27/03/2009 15:47 Won De Erick said
> the following:
> > --- On Fri, 3/27/09, Andriy Gapon
> wrote:
> >> on 27/03/2009 12:35 Ivan Voras said the
> following:
> >>> One thing that comes to my mind is thi
--- On Thu, 4/2/09, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> I have some vague thoughts on using SW_WATCHDOG and a
> hardware watchdog together.
> I think this could be useful but I am not sure how to
> implement this.
> The idea is this: timeout for SW_WATCHDOG is smaller than
> timeout for hw wd; when
> some f
14 matches
Mail list logo
