>Why do FreeBSD-9 use still file-5.3 ? whereas file-5.09 was ready to use with
>updated >magic databases (was ready FreeBSD9 release date). Do you know why
>FreeBSD insist >to use old magic databases ?
FreeBSD doesn't "insist" on the use of old versions of file -- it is
just that no committer
Brandon Falk wrote:
> I've been thinking for a while about possibly making an extremely
> lightweight environment that supports full monitor resolution, custom
> fonts, and terminals... that's about it.
You may also want to look at our system libvgl ( vgl(3) ),
ports/devel/directfb ( http://dire
Most of these questions are more suitable for the freebsd-stable or
freebsd-questions mailing lists, rather than freebsd-hackers.
Alex Goncharov wrote:
> What I see in 9 now is very confusing for me; e.g.:
>
> * Why 'snd_hda.ko' even exists, if the whole 'snd_hda' implementation lives in
> 'kern
>
> I suggest we should add a See Also section to man bzip2,
>
> FreeBSD-8.2-RELEASE & current man bzip2
> .../-current/src/contrib/bzip2/bzip2.1
>
> adding URLs
> http://www.7-zip.org/download.html ->
> http://www.freshports.org/archivers/p7zip/
>
> as
> I have systems running 7.4 and 8.2. The newer ones (in terms of age of
> hardware) are always running at profhz, i.e., when executing a "systat
> -vm 1" I see that all cores always get profhz interrupts per second.
>
> An older machine running 7.4 is running at hz (which for this machine I
> set
>I filed gcc PR asking gcc to revert their behavior back to prescribed by
>documentation: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47842
Heh, good luck!:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38496
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
h
> > Where is it documented?
> > Are there differences with the linux ABI?
> >
> > Particularly I am interested in stack alignment requirement. For example
> > i386 Solaris, Linux and MacOS have 16 bit stack alignment for procedure
> > calls. This is reflected in LLVM sources:
> >
> > if (isTarget
>We aren't dealing with mathematicians, but programmers.
I am attempting to reconcile this with Colin's rationale in terms of
congruence classes over rings Z/nZ. ;)
b.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinf
>To further confuse matters there appears to be a common misconception on the
>web
>that the cmos time is automatically synced to system time on FreeBSD. This is
>incorrect: see msg03414 on freebsd-hardware at freebsd.org.
The situation has changed in 8-STABLE and 9-CURRENT since the above
messag
>I'm trying to update graphics/lightspark-devel port to the latest
>version, and it's firefox plugin now doesn't load. The supposed reason
>for that is that the plugin is build with gcc 4.4+ (as it uses c++0x
>features), and firefox is built with our default gcc 4.2, thus libstdc++
>versions doesn'
On Tue Aug 3 15:22:00 UTC 2010, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
...
>I therefore propose the following change to always link in
>libssp_nonshared.a. I think this change is harmless when the symbol is
>not needed in one of the objects linked together since the linker won't
>pull in the library member "ssp-lo
>So I'm taking it that the only change of benefit is the attached patch.
While you are there, you might also:
line 150: s/supercede/supersede/
line 764: s/dependancies/dependencies/
line 2982: s/everthing/everything/
line 6142: s/servicable/serviceable/
b.
___
On 5/20/10, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 01:41:22PM -0400, b. f. wrote:
>> I'm wondering why we equate cpu_fxsr and hw_instruction_sse in our
>> kernel, when several families of Intel and AMD processors have
>> fxsave/fxrstor, but not sse, and v
I'm wondering why we equate cpu_fxsr and hw_instruction_sse in our
kernel, when several families of Intel and AMD processors have
fxsave/fxrstor, but not sse, and various documents from both companies
suggest that fxsave/fxrstor is faster than fsave/fnsave/frstor, even
when only saving the fpu/mmx
Doug Barton wrote:
>On 4/20/2010 7:11 PM, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
>> I acciddentally rm'ed my /var/db/pkg and want to know is it possible to
>> rgenerate it (I have portmaster and portupgrade installed)
>
>Portmaster certainly can't do this, it uses the information from
>/var/db/pkg. I'm not sure
>Am 22.04.2010 14:49, schrieb Diane Bruce:
>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:11:24PM -0400, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
>>> I acciddentally rm'ed my /var/db/pkg and want to know is it possible to
>>> rgenerate it (I have portmaster and portupgrade installed)
>>
>>
>> You would have to write a script which
>> The code organization depends on what you want to do with it and how you
>> want to update the code in the future, if your lzma library is third party.
>
>LZMA made by Igor Pavlov, and since 4.62 it licensed under Public Domain.
>So we can use it, if we need.
>
>>
>> If you never intend to updat
17 matches
Mail list logo
