Take a look at gcore. That will let you checkpoint memory mappings and
registers. The dragonfly implementation also keeps track of the sbrk
value and open file handles which you will need to handle separately.
Restoring the mappings and register state should be straightforward.
I'm not sure at
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb
bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, alan yang wrote:
Hey,
Wonder people had implemented interface to import / export flowtable.
Yes I did, and I added an API to query it more generally. I didn't add
it to
You're right. A write memory barrier is needed there.
Thanks
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 12:43 AM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 8:46 AM, K. Macy km...@freebsd.org wrote:
If the value lags next by one then it is ours. This rule applies to
all callers so
If the value lags next by one then it is ours. This rule applies to
all callers so the rule holds consistently.
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 5:53 AM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 10:41 AM, K. Macy km...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 3:02 AM
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Kip,
I've got a few question about the buf_ring(9) API.
1) what means the 'drbr_' prefix. I can guess the two last letter, 'b'
and
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 4:53 AM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Kip,
I've got a few question about the buf_ring(9) API.
1) what means the 'drbr_' prefix. I can guess the two last letter, 'b'
and 'r', for Buffer Ring, but what about 'd' and 'r' ?
DRiver BufRing
2) in
Just add them to the makefile. They'll be automatically created as
dependencies.
2011/9/8 Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org:
Hello, Freebsd-hackers.
I need to include sys/bus.h in my kernel module to use
devctl_notify(). But my module doesn't have device_if.h or bus_if.h,
which are required
2011/9/8 Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org:
Hello, K..
You wrote 8 сентября 2011 г., 18:22:11:
Just add them to the makefile. They'll be automatically created as
dependencies.
Is it good idea to create these empty files only for one prototype
from sys/bus.h?
I can't comment on whether or
Have you taken a look at lldb? It is designed to be more modular.
-Kip
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Ewart Tempest etemp...@jnpr.net wrote:
I have developed some flight recording capability in the JUNOS FreeBSD based
kernel, with the flight recorded data being captured in binary form for
Oops, second 10 GigE should obviously be 1GigE
On Tuesday, June 7, 2011, K. Macy km...@freebsd.org wrote:
All 10GigE NICs and some newer 10 GigE NICs have multiple hardware
queues with a separate MSI-x vector per queue, where each vector is
directed to a different CPU. The current operating
All 10GigE NICs and some newer 10 GigE NICs have multiple hardware
queues with a separate MSI-x vector per queue, where each vector is
directed to a different CPU. The current operating model is to have a
separate interrupt thread per vector. This obviously gets bogged down
if one has multiple
See my page now. It contains a pointer to a tarball
with what I believe to be the appropriate style
patches and a single unified diff. I'm obviously new
to this so humor me and let me know if there are any
further problems.
--- David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at
Look at the posix shmem and sem functions:
shm_open
shm_unlink
sem_open, sem_close, sem_post etc.
--- Matthew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a sysv semphore/shmem implementation using
mmap available for FreeBSD? I need a userland
based sysv
sem/shm library to write a little project, any
It turns that this problem is specific to AIO in
-CURRENT. I wrote a simple program that uses
the three different completion mechanisms (polling
with aio_error, polling with kevent, and using SIGIO)
to fill up a file by writing 8kb at a time to the
file and then reading 8kb at a time from the
Has anybody used AIO in conjunction with kevent?
I am seeing as much as a 12 second latency between
when I do an 8k aio_write to a file on local disk
and kevent returning its completion (I'm calling
kevent every ~20ms). Using regular writes works fine,
but this is a multi-threaded application
Not to mention that SIGVTALRM is already used by
the thread library (although I would hope that
_thread_sys_sigaction is smart enough to handle
that case). I've stepped through the GDB
code on both 4.18 and 5.1. On 5.1 I found the
following in i386fbsd-nat.c:
void
child_resume (ptid_t ptid, int
== SK_SIGNAL_MSG)
(msg-data.l == HARD_SIG_00010))
break;
} while (1);
sk_remove_poll_fd(slot);
}
beneath this it just uses poll
--- Ian Dowse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
k Macy writes:
Any idea why when I insert a breakpoint I get a
SIGTRAP
17 matches
Mail list logo
