)
--
wbr,
pluknet
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
beyond the limits of feasible server.
There is a one (16cores per socket, up to 4 sockets, 512 way).
http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/press/173536
--
wbr,
pluknet
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
if required.
FYI, There is a PR 146119 about sort of fixing that issues.
--
wbr,
pluknet
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-hackers-unsubscr
On 16 July 2010 01:42, Gabor Kovesdan ga...@freebsd.org wrote:
Em 2010.07.13. 16:05, pluknet escreveu:
#ifndef _SYS_SYSPROTO_H_
struct setjlimit_args {
jid_t jid;
int resource;
struct rlimit *rlp;
};
#endif
int
setjlimit(td, uap)
struct thread *td
On 12 July 2010 15:11, Gabor Kovesdan ga...@freebsd.org wrote:
Em 2010.07.12. 9:00, pluknet escreveu:
Looking at getjid() impl, I see you're trying to put jid_t into the
one register_t
which are 64-bit vs 32-bit capable respectively.
You need to cast so you put 64-bit into two 32-bit as done
() returns 1 this case, whose type is
jid_t
Looking at getjid() impl, I see you're trying to put jid_t into the
one register_t
which are 64-bit vs 32-bit capable respectively.
You need to cast so you put 64-bit into two 32-bit as done for e.g. lseek().
--
wbr,
pluknet
(or recommendations for pro audio
hardware that actually works with freebsd).
Regards,
xw
Hi!
I have audiophile192 card, it uses a different envy24ht (not envy24),
but with the same mixer warnings you described above.
I saw these warning since time driver has been committed to the tree.
--
wbr,
pluknet
On 7 July 2010 22:58, xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 2010-07-07 22:50:14, pluknet wrote:
Hi!
I have audiophile192 card, it uses a different envy24ht (not envy24),
but with the same mixer warnings you described above.
I saw these warning since time driver has been committed to the tree
, this behav isn't portable.
--
wbr,
pluknet
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On 30 June 2010 11:33, pluknet pluk...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 June 2010 10:26, Andrey Zonov andrey.zo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I want to set P_PROTECTED flag for some daemons after it start, without
patching application and kernel.
It possible?
May be madvise(NULL, 0, MADV_PROTECT
);
Thanks, I'll try it. Is the returned ID the LWP ID that GDB shows?
thr_self() does its work as well as ddb and procstat do: using td-td_tid.
--
wbr,
pluknet
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
will be added that allows the setting of all
three times at once.
btw, there's a paper someone can find something interesting at.
http://www.usenix.org/events/bsdcon03/tech/full_papers/mckusick/mckusick_html/
--
wbr,
pluknet
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
, 7.3-R (all amd64).
All runs flawlessly.
I'll try to boot it from head today if that matters.
--
wbr,
pluknet
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail
/* Copy the current memory usage to the prison struct */
764 mtx_lock(pr-pr_mtx);
765 pr-pr_mem_usage = mem_used;
766 pr-pr_full_mem_usage = full_mem_used;
767 mtx_unlock(pr-pr_mtx);
768 }
769
Tom
--
wbr,
pluknet
. That's what I see on Solaris:
df: operation not applicable for FSType zfs
--
wbr,
pluknet
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-hackers-unsubscr
to find, rather than easier.
And which is a way some well known OS' developers like to choose to
fix sec.holes. No cookie.
P.S. I apologize for flaming on this.
(next week's topic: the return value of malloc(0)...)
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no
--
wbr,
pluknet
ee just
dumped me straight to the prompt.
I am wondering if this has anything to do with the new tty subsystem
in 8.0, as this wasn't a problem I've experienced before under 7.x...
No, that's a regression appeared in (FreeBSD'ish? version of) ee 1.5.0.
--
wbr,
pluknet
2009/10/23 Alexander Best alexbes...@math.uni-muenster.de:
Gary Jennejohn schrieb am 2009-10-23:
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:58:43 +0400
pluknet pluk...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/10/23 Antony Mawer li...@mawer.org:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Alexander Best
alexbes...@math.uni-muenster.de
2009/10/23 Alexander Best alexbes...@math.uni-muenster.de:
pluknet schrieb am 2009-10-23:
2009/10/23 Alexander Best alexbes...@math.uni-muenster.de:
Gary Jennejohn schrieb am 2009-10-23:
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:58:43 +0400
pluknet pluk...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/10/23 Antony Mawer li
) after read 6GB data from this
file
and print debug messages on ttyv0
As to prevent the emergence of this problem?
As monitor the status of RAID-controller?
You can check status of aac controller with arcconf utility
and post results there..
--
wbr,
pluknet
is not need.
Am I right?
Thanks.
--
wbr,
pluknet
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
):
P_SYSTEM0x00200 System proc: no sigs,
stats or swapping
--
wbr,
pluknet
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd
Hi.
Am I right that td_estcpu is only updated under SCHED_4BSD ?
(well, user's ki_estcpu is not used in top anyway. ps shows all zeroes
under SCHED_ULE (as it should then though). I'm just interested.)
--
wbr,
pluknet
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
= if
+2drop
+share-logo
+exit
+then
2dup s none compare-insensitive 0= if
2drop
\ no logo
(spied out from http://www.opennet.ru/opennews/art.shtml?num=20136)
--
wbr,
pluknet
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
Hi.
The problem is:
I have a program which is statically linked to my static lib during a build.
The lib is in turn uses kvm*() calls, hence it should be linked with libkvm.
During the build of my binaries which are linked to my libucron.a I
get the following:
/usr/home/pluknet/svn/ucron
2009/2/5 pluknet pluk...@gmail.com:
Hi.
The problem is:
I have a program which is statically linked to my static lib during a build.
The lib is in turn uses kvm*() calls, hence it should be linked with libkvm.
During the build of my binaries which are linked to my libucron.a I
get
but cannot understand it.
--
wbr,
pluknet
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
)
fi
So I simply want to figure out an equalavant check I can do on FreeBSD.
Hi.
You may look at sysctl kern.polling presence.
--
wbr,
pluknet
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
2009/1/11 Tim Kientzle kient...@freebsd.org:
pluknet wrote:
2009/1/11 Tim Kientzle kient...@freebsd.org:
FreeBSD 6.3:
fd = open(test, O_WRONLY | O_CREAT | O_EXCL, 0777);
n = extattr_set_fd(fd, EXTATTR_NAMESPACE_USER, testattr, 1234, 4);
After this, fd=3, n is non-zero, errno = 9 (EBADF
EBADF from getvnode() on failed
(td-td_proc-p_fd == NULL)
or
(fp = fdp-fd_ofiles[fd]) == NULL)
checks.
Tim
--
wbr,
pluknet
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail
, /stand was only ever populated
on install and there's no guarantees it was ever up to date.
Humm, 8.0 has /rescue/sed.
It's was added there over a year ago, but not in stable.
--
wbr,
pluknet
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http
2008/12/17 Paul B. Mahol one...@gmail.com:
On 12/17/08, pluknet pluk...@gmail.com wrote:
2008/12/17 Paul B. Mahol one...@gmail.com:
On 12/17/08, pluknet pluk...@gmail.com wrote:
2008/12/17 pluknet pluk...@gmail.com:
2008/12/16 Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 03
2008/12/17 pluknet pluk...@gmail.com:
2008/12/16 Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 03:23:28PM +0300, pluknet wrote:
Hi.
Could the PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE option be safely merged into RELENG_6 without
merging a possible underlining infrastructure and breaking something
2008/12/17 Paul B. Mahol one...@gmail.com:
On 12/17/08, pluknet pluk...@gmail.com wrote:
2008/12/17 pluknet pluk...@gmail.com:
2008/12/16 Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 03:23:28PM +0300, pluknet wrote:
Hi.
Could the PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE option be safely merged
2008/12/16 Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 03:23:28PM +0300, pluknet wrote:
Hi.
Could the PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE option be safely merged into RELENG_6 without
merging a possible underlining infrastructure and breaking something else?
I want to use it in my custom
://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2008-November/026566.html
and especially http://www.freebsd.org/projects/index.html
http://wiki.freebsd.org/ will be good too.
can we have a russian speaking developer contact him too?
it's her :)
--
wbr,
pluknet
that was
imported a few months ago.
What was the reason to rename? Isn't that a POLA violation for both
users/older software?
You should read pty(4).
--
wbr,
pluknet
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
..)?
vm_map_submap(9) might help you.
btw, it's called only from one place I can find: kmem_suballoc.
Thanks,
--
wbr,
pluknet
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail
. It's definitely 7.0 backtrace (or close to).. 6.2 has different
line numbers.
--
wbr,
pluknet
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, It will if you add them to standard files list (see conf/files).
(Otherwise if you want it as options directive in your kernel config
than you should mark its module name in conf/files and also put
an appropriate record into conf/options).
-
pluknet
___
freebsd
-1.92.tbz) can be found at
http://www.pastebin.ca/921830
TIA,
Yuri
You cannot sleep in high priority ithread handler, pfind() uses
sleepable sx(9) lock.
In your case it fail to acquire a shared lock and trying to sleep.
Probably you should call pfind() elsewhere.
wbr,
pluknet
that those two numbers represent the amount of IO
generated within some time slice, but I can't find any documentation on
it...
Did you look at devstat(3) ?
I think there is all you need to know about devstat library.
wbr,
pluknet
___
freebsd-hackers
42 matches
Mail list logo