BLOCKED DELIVERY OF EMAIL FROM [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Our email scanner has detected a VIRUS in an email destined for you.
This email has been stopped. The sender will receive a notification of this message.
This is ONLY a warning. You have not suffered any damage nor received any
BLOCKED DELIVERY OF EMAIL FROM [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Our email scanner has detected a VIRUS in an email destined for you.
This email has been stopped. The sender will receive a notification of this message.
This is ONLY a warning. You have not suffered any damage nor received any
> Sorry, not knowing what the @#$! one is doing does not translate
> into the OS having a high time until usefulness. IMHO, FreeBSD's
> TUU and TCO are _so_ much lower than Linux or NT... that's one of
> the non-technical reasons that I love it so.
Whats the saying, "knowledge without understan
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Michael C . Wu wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 03:10:38PM +0100, daniel lawrence scribbled:
> | This is probably a long shot, but I'll ask anyway. We have 3 HP9000/L1000
> | machines which we may be able to make available (serial console and network)
> | for some kind of BSD
On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Charles Randall wrote:
> Did anyone offer to contact Lyris directly to identify a configuration which
> would have fared better in their tests? Since their application is available
> for FreeBSD, it is in our best interests for to help them out.
On a side note, I did contact
On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Doug Barton writes:
> : reason is that when you say "System V" anything, people have immediate
> : negative reactions that are based purely on emotion.
>
> S01My S02reactions S03to S04system S05V S06is S07not S08based
> S09
On Sun, 10 Jun 2001, Gyori Sandor wrote:
> Hello,
>
> There are patches to solve this problem at
> http://www.nectar.com/freebsd/nsswitch
> but only a part of them was built in to -CURRENT (the statical part).
>
> Could anybody tell me why? This is a serious deficiency of FreeBSD which
> has be
> Actually, it was my contact at Intel who put me in touch with the right
> people at SMC. As for the documentation, National has all the manuals for
> their stuff online:
> That said, Intel also agreed to let D-Link release the LXT1001 manual
> to me, so I have that too. Both D-Link and SMC sell
Is there a POC we can all send thanks to for supplying the neccessary HW
and doco? Since they seem to be a more friendly company then Intel it
would do us well IMO to thank them for it.
=
-Chris Watson (316) 326-
I would like to see this too, however I think you have to sign NDA's and
the like to be a part of the AMD effort to develop for it. Understandable
I guess. Also they only seem interested in boosting Linux adoption of the
new AMD 64 bit procs. *shrug*
=
> Just to note that this a comparison between a current system running
> Vinum, and quite possibly the worst PCI RAID card ever manufactured by
> anyone, anywhere. 8)
*sigh* Thanks mike. Ruin a perfectly good MS type of PR for us :-)
This was great "See clueless boss! Vinum is FASTER t
> Will the machine boot off of the second drive if the first one fails?
You can't boot off Vinum drives.
=
-Chris Watson (316) 326-3862 | FreeBSD Consultant, FreeBSD Geek
Work: [EMAIL PRO
On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Richard Hodges wrote:
> Thanks for the tip on the XL driver. Over the years, I have seen
> many questions about which driver/card was the best, and all the
> answers were pretty vague, or suggested that Intel had the edge.
Yes. It's currently my understanding that t
On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Richard Hodges wrote:
> For many (most?) people that may be practical. But what about
> those of us with a 1RU system using fxp on the motherboard and
> NEED the single PCI slot for something else? I suspect that
> there are more of us than you might think.
Richard,
On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> I have read the thread for a while, and i wonder:
>
> why in the world someone should go through the effort and
> responsibility of SIGNING THE NDA _and_ negotiating with Intel
> for getting permissions to redistribute the code ?
I made the ef
-- Forwarded message --
Hello Mr. Chris Watson
Thanks for taking the time to discuss with me your concerns.
Could you take the the time to forward me some sort of representative list
of the types of information that FreeBSD developers require to do driver
development?
Would like
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> Let me just pipe in a bit. Compromise seems just like the kind of thing
> marketing or legal would want to do. The problem is that _we_ cannot
> compromise because one cannot write a "half-way there" driver. It's a
> technical impossibility.
I agree
I just got off the phone with Linda Sanchez at our favorite company
Intel. She is a Sr. "Marketing Engineer" (What is a marketing
engineer?) for their LAN products. She is itnerested in helping us get the
information we need to write drivers for their cards. But she also knows
NDA's are
http://www.shub-internet.org/brad/FreeBSD/vinum.html
Sorry for the delay. It slipped my mind. :-)
=
-Chris Watson (316) 326-3862 | FreeBSD Consultant, FreeBSD Geek
Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Open Sy
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
> Well, as I said, these boxes are rather bored. I don't think the load
> reaches above 0.05. Most of the time is delivering mail trying to
> negotiate with destination hosts. I don't think that the mailers are IO
> bound, but I haven't really looked to f
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
> Forgot to add info about the mailers. Each has a hardware raid controller
> with about 32MB of memory on the controller configured to RAID-1 2HDs for
> redundancy. Ideally, the mail never actually hits the disk but resides
> exclusively in memory.
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Len Conrad wrote:
> >kern.ipc.maxsockets = 5000
> >kern.ipc.maxsockbuf = 524288
> >
> >But neither parameter takes effect.
If the sysctl's are read only that you want to change slap them in
your /boot/loader.rc
\ Increase MBUF's for purpose of testing Postfix under
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Mike Smith wrote:
> Solaris. Forget Linux for NFS service.
As was indicitve of the qmail/softupdates problem that was finally
resolved with postfix on FreeBSD, this problem also is the direct result
of a PHB. :-/
=
> /0 /10 /20 /30 /40 /50 /60 /70 /80 /90 /100
> ad0 MB/s
> tps|108.83
> that is why i know it is IO#1.
Ok there is your first problem. Using a single IDE disk as your
mail store is fine if your in a small lan.
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Dan Phoenix wrote:
>
> I am sitting with a 80-90% IO disk problem after converting this one box
> from linux to freebsd. I enabled soft-updates on that partition...that did
> not help to much...and ram is fine. I am guessing because ext2fs uses
> asyncronous metadatawrites an
On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> Yes, but nmbclusters can, see the loader(8) manpage for the tunables
> to raise kern.ipc.nmbclusters, you might have better luck setting
> it to 32768.
Is it possible to make the tuning of nmbclusters available after
the kenrel is loaded. So
On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Mike Silbersack wrote:
> > The machine can get up 200 SMTP processes and 50 SMTPD processes
> > simulatenously, 256 meg RAM.
> >
> > Increasing maxusers will fix this pb? afaic, maxusers can't be fixed
> > with sysctl.
>
> I think you can up the mbuf related settings while
I *LOVE* my Tyan S2380 K7 Trinity MB.
=
-Chris Watson (316) 326-3862 | FreeBSD Consultant, FreeBSD Geek
Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Open Systems Inc., Wellington, Kansas
Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | htt
On Thu, 25 May 2000, Anatoly Vorobey wrote:
> and I've always wanted to ask: is that a necessary 'feature' of MFS's
> architecture, or something which could possibly be fixed without
> too much hard work? For instance, would it be possible to force
> VM not to cache MFS pages, etc.?
Not being an
29 matches
Mail list logo
