Re: Pthread blocking I/O

Hi, I have not so much experience using POSIX threads, but we had in university a project and for I/O to use threads is not so good method. You slow down the process. Some comments? Isn't so? stefan Titus von Boxberg wrote: > > Hi, > > I use two threads to do I/O for a process. > The I/O t

sotruss utility / Rational porting ?

Hello all, I would like to ask you couple of questions: 1. Do we have a tool which is tracing the libraries as in Solaris, sotruss? 2. Do we have a starting point for a proposal to Rational for a porting of ClearCase and Purify tools on FreeBSD 3.x or 4.x? I think they are doing an official por

Re: Shrinking the BSD kernel

thanks, I will. At 07:59 PM 12/23/99 +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote: >On Thu, Dec 23, 1999 at 07:32:47AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: >> On Thu, 23 Dec 1999, Stefan Parvu wrote: >> >> > Does anybody know real procedures, steps whatever to keep a small an >> > effici

Shrinking the BSD kernel

Hi all, I was working a couple of days to have a small as possible kernel in FreeBSD 3.3 Release. Well coud somebody point me to some docs about this subject ? Does anybody know real procedures, steps whatever to keep a small an efficient kernel ? thanks, Stef To Unsubscribe: send mail to [

Re: 2questions

thanks for your answers. With some comments: 1. I've asked at XIG what it is about and they told me that this a problem of FreeBSD OS. Not about their server. Anyway I have asked also why they didn't test Accel 5.0.2 on FreeBSD 3.x ? With no success.No comments. I have also asked about 3D X serv

2questions

Hi all, I have posted this email for [EMAIL PROTECTED] but I didn't got any answer. I am running FreeBSD 3.3 Release on one laptop Toshiba and as XServer the Accelerated X 5.0.2. I am curious about one fact. Everytime when I exit from XServer I 've got: > pid 8971 (Xaccel): trap 12 with interr

Re: VDSL cards for FreeBSD, any interest ?

Hello, Well I am in Helsinki and it's good to hear about this. What about prices ? VDSL PCI Stef At 03:06 PM 10/15/99 +0300, Heikki Suonsivu wrote: > >If any of you are visiting at telecom99 in Geneva, see our booth at hall 8, >turn right from the door, it is in the corner. We are presenting

Re: IPv6 on 3.2 STABLE ?

Well and more details from mailing list is that there is no "standard" for IPv6 yet. Somebody could explain a little bit here what really means this when DEC, HP they have already on the TCP stack the newest IP ? Stef stefan parvu wrote: > > Hello, > > Last night I worke

Re: IPv6 on 3.2 STABLE ?

. > > now, as to why it's not rolled in already? > > my guess is that it's due to IPng/IPv6 still being under development. > > rumour has it that IPv6 support is going to be fully rolled in "relativly > soon." how accurate that rumour is, i don't know.

IPv6 on 3.2 STABLE ?

Hello, Last night I worked to port some code to FreeBSD 3.2 Stable. I was curious about one fact: on there is no any in6_addr support for IPv6. Am I wrong ? FreeBSD does not support IPv6 ? Regards, Stef To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the