posted patches to this effect some months ago. they needed some
clean-up and validation but the also mapped correctly into an
RPC_NGROUPS_MAX and IPC_NGROUPS_MAX for consistent (and possibly
dynamic) mapping to those problem areas. they build and run but are
untested beyond that. i do not
On 25.03-05:31, David Schultz wrote:
[ ... ]
A person's Copyright doesn't go away just because they die,
disappear, or fail to respond. If you can't contact them, their
heirs, or whomever they transferred the Copyright to, you're stuck.
yeah but it's a little like finding something. if there
On 23.03-00:39, David Schultz wrote:
[ ... ]
There's already a kern.ngroups sysctl, but there are many places
where `ngroups' needs to be used in preference to NGROUPS in the
kernel. In userland, sysconf(_SC_NGROUPS_MAX) needs to be used in
preference to NGROUPS_MAX.
you will also note that,
On 22.03-22:33, Boris Kochergin wrote:
Ahoy. I got bitten by this today--a system I administer for someone had
users in more than 16 groups, so I had to bump the value, recompile the
kernel, and reboot. It seems desirable to (at the very least) make this
a read-only tunable that can be set
On 21.02-22:49, Julian Elischer wrote:
[ ... ]
this patch should remove the dependancy on the definition of
NGROUPS_MAX as a static constant and implement it as a writable
sysconf variable of the same. it should also make the necessary
changes to the codebase to support those.
[ ... ]
What
attached is the first in a series of patches that is intended to
remove the current limitation on group membership.
this patch should remove the dependancy on the definition of
NGROUPS_MAX as a static constant and implement it as a writable
sysconf variable of the same. it should also make the
6 matches
Mail list logo
