On Tue, 6 Jul 1999, Alex Zepeda wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Jul 1999, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
>
> > RTFM isn't a newby-apparent term. Name it help(1).
>
> Sure it is. Some hapless newbie wanders into #FreeBDS on efnet, and asks
> an already answered question. Aside from a kick, and a possible ban,
> th
On Tue, 6 Jul 1999, Alex Zepeda wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Jul 1999, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
>
> > RTFM isn't a newby-apparent term. Name it help(1).
>
> Sure it is. Some hapless newbie wanders into #FreeBDS on efnet, and asks
> an already answered question. Aside from a kick, and a possible ban,
> t
Put it in the ".login" or /etc/csh.login (etc.) file.
They'll see it every time they log in.
-Mark Taylor
NetMAX Developer
mtay...@cybernet.com
http://www.netmax.com/
Wes Peters wrote:
>
> Bill Fumerola wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 6 Jul 1999, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks! But still, I
Put it in the ".login" or /etc/csh.login (etc.) file.
They'll see it every time they log in.
-Mark Taylor
NetMAX Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.netmax.com/
Wes Peters wrote:
>
> Bill Fumerola wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 6 Jul 1999, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks! But still, I d
On Wed, Jul 7, 1999, Wes Peters wrote:
> Now there's an idea! Someone wanna code up wmrtfm real quick? It should
> start an rxvt (if available) or xterm running rtfm on strings that are
> dropped onto or pasted into the dock icon.
Wait until someone writes grtfm! GNOME support, panel applet,
On Wed, Jul 7, 1999, Wes Peters wrote:
> Now there's an idea! Someone wanna code up wmrtfm real quick? It should
> start an rxvt (if available) or xterm running rtfm on strings that are
> dropped onto or pasted into the dock icon.
Wait until someone writes grtfm! GNOME support, panel applet
Bill Fumerola wrote:
>
> On Tue, 6 Jul 1999, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
>
> > Thanks! But still, I don't think rtfm is very appropriate... Can we look
> > for something better, more obvious? Or perhaps it would be in the motd
> > like /stand/sysinstall is people would need to be aware of this.
>
Bill Fumerola wrote:
>
> On Tue, 6 Jul 1999, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
>
> > Thanks! But still, I don't think rtfm is very appropriate... Can we look
> > for something better, more obvious? Or perhaps it would be in the motd
> > like /stand/sysinstall is people would need to be aware of this.
On Tue, 6 Jul 1999, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
> Thanks! But still, I don't think rtfm is very appropriate... Can we look
> for something better, more obvious? Or perhaps it would be in the motd
> like /stand/sysinstall is people would need to be aware of this.
it can be called anything. the new
On Tue, 6 Jul 1999, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
> Thanks! But still, I don't think rtfm is very appropriate... Can we look
> for something better, more obvious? Or perhaps it would be in the motd
> like /stand/sysinstall is people would need to be aware of this.
it can be called anything. the ne
On Tue, Jul 06, 1999 at 04:57:08PM -0500, Chris Costello wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 6, 1999, Nik Clayton wrote:
> > There are a couple of ways you could do it. Some of them more optimal
> > than others.
> >
> >Executive summary: sgrep is probably your best choice now, which can
> >can be foun
On Tue, Jul 06, 1999 at 04:57:08PM -0500, Chris Costello wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 6, 1999, Nik Clayton wrote:
> > There are a couple of ways you could do it. Some of them more optimal
> > than others.
> >
> >Executive summary: sgrep is probably your best choice now, which can
> >can be fou
"Brian F. Feldman" wrote:
>
> On Tue, 6 Jul 1999, Chris Costello wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 6, 1999, Doug wrote:
> > > I'm confused about this script. How does it differ from 'apropos'?
> >
> >It differs in that it _uses_ apropos (or 'whatis' if you
> > specify the -e flag), as well as a Te
"Brian F. Feldman" wrote:
>
> On Tue, 6 Jul 1999, Chris Costello wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 6, 1999, Doug wrote:
> > > I'm confused about this script. How does it differ from 'apropos'?
> >
> >It differs in that it _uses_ apropos (or 'whatis' if you
> > specify the -e flag), as well as a T
On Tue, Jul 06, 1999 at 11:55:26AM +0100, Nik Clayton wrote:
>
> *Much* simpler is to build a grep-alike that understands structured
> documents, but that doesn't care how those documents are structured. This
Perhaps dtags(1) a-la ctags(1).
--
This is my .signature which gets appended to the
On Tue, Jul 6, 1999, Nik Clayton wrote:
> I've added d...@freebsd.org to the distribution list, for obvious reasons.
>
> On Mon, Jul 05, 1999 at 02:16:36PM -0500, Chris Costello wrote:
> >Note that I can't figure out a decent way to search the
> > Handbook at this point, but I'm open to ideas.
On Tue, Jul 06, 1999 at 11:55:26AM +0100, Nik Clayton wrote:
>
> *Much* simpler is to build a grep-alike that understands structured
> documents, but that doesn't care how those documents are structured. This
Perhaps dtags(1) a-la ctags(1).
--
This is my .signature which gets appended to th
logic is faulty here. There are already many adequate
> resources in the motd, but your argument for the 'rtfm script' presupposes
> that the person has not looked at the motd, because if they had they
> wouldn't need the script.
/bin/rtfmsh?
>
> Honestly, wh
On Tue, Jul 6, 1999, Doug wrote:
> Honestly, while this is one of those things that sounds good when
> you first start talking about it, in practice I don't see what we gain
> from it.
What we gain from it is really simple and can be obtained from
looking at how it operates. It's a star
fm is very appropriate... Can we look
> for something better, more obvious? Or perhaps it would be in the motd
> like /stand/sysinstall is people would need to be aware of this.
I think your logic is faulty here. There are already many adequate
resources in the motd, but your argument
I think that whomever actually writes it will get to name it whatever
the hell they way, that's what I think. :)
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
On Tue, 6 Jul 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> > Which can be disabled in the bash port before the next release...
>
> No, that's a really stupid idea.
Thanks! But still, I don't think rtfm is very appropriate... Can we look
for something better, more obvious? Or perhaps it would be in the motd
> Which can be disabled in the bash port before the next release...
No, that's a really stupid idea.
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
On Tue, Jul 6, 1999, Nik Clayton wrote:
> I've added [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the distribution list, for obvious reasons.
>
> On Mon, Jul 05, 1999 at 02:16:36PM -0500, Chris Costello wrote:
> >Note that I can't figure out a decent way to search the
> > Handbook at this point, but I'm open to idea
logic is faulty here. There are already many adequate
> resources in the motd, but your argument for the 'rtfm script' presupposes
> that the person has not looked at the motd, because if they had they
> wouldn't need the script.
/bin/rtfmsh?
>
> Honestly, wh
On Tue, Jul 6, 1999, Doug wrote:
> Honestly, while this is one of those things that sounds good when
> you first start talking about it, in practice I don't see what we gain
> from it.
What we gain from it is really simple and can be obtained from
looking at how it operates. It's a sta
fm is very appropriate... Can we look
> for something better, more obvious? Or perhaps it would be in the motd
> like /stand/sysinstall is people would need to be aware of this.
I think your logic is faulty here. There are already many adequate
resources in the motd, but your argument
On Tue, Jul 06, 1999 at 02:52:08PM -0400, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 6, 1999, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
> > > RTFM isn't a newby-apparent term. Name it help(1).
> >
> >That would cause problems with bash users. They already have
> > a builtin help command.
>
> Which can be disable
I think that whomever actually writes it will get to name it whatever
the hell they way, that's what I think. :)
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
On Tue, 6 Jul 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> > Which can be disabled in the bash port before the next release...
>
> No, that's a really stupid idea.
Thanks! But still, I don't think rtfm is very appropriate... Can we look
for something better, more obvious? Or perhaps it would be in the motd
> Which can be disabled in the bash port before the next release...
No, that's a really stupid idea.
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
On Tue, 6 Jul 1999, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
> RTFM isn't a newby-apparent term. Name it help(1).
Sure it is. Some hapless newbie wanders into #FreeBDS on efnet, and asks
an already answered question. Aside from a kick, and a possible ban,
they're likely to be met with a chorus of "rtfm", which
On Tue, Jul 06, 1999 at 02:52:08PM -0400, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 6, 1999, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
> > > RTFM isn't a newby-apparent term. Name it help(1).
> >
> >That would cause problems with bash users. They already have
> > a builtin help command.
>
> Which can be disabl
On Tue, 6 Jul 1999, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
> RTFM isn't a newby-apparent term. Name it help(1).
Sure it is. Some hapless newbie wanders into #FreeBDS on efnet, and asks
an already answered question. Aside from a kick, and a possible ban,
they're likely to be met with a chorus of "rtfm", which
On Tue, 6 Jul 1999, Chris Costello wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 6, 1999, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
> > RTFM isn't a newby-apparent term. Name it help(1).
>
>That would cause problems with bash users. They already have
> a builtin help command.
Which can be disabled in the bash port before the next re
On Tue, Jul 6, 1999, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
> RTFM isn't a newby-apparent term. Name it help(1).
That would cause problems with bash users. They already have
a builtin help command.
--
Chris Costello
On a clear disk you can seek forever. - Denning
To Unsub
On Tue, 6 Jul 1999, Chris Costello wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 6, 1999, Doug wrote:
> > I'm confused about this script. How does it differ from 'apropos'?
>
>It differs in that it _uses_ apropos (or 'whatis' if you
> specify the -e flag), as well as a Texinfo search, as well as a
> FAQ search, u
On Tue, Jul 6, 1999, Doug wrote:
> I'm confused about this script. How does it differ from 'apropos'?
It differs in that it _uses_ apropos (or 'whatis' if you
specify the -e flag), as well as a Texinfo search, as well as a
FAQ search, using the FAQ pages at http://www.freebsd.org/FAQ/.
It
On Tue, 6 Jul 1999, Chris Costello wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 6, 1999, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
> > RTFM isn't a newby-apparent term. Name it help(1).
>
>That would cause problems with bash users. They already have
> a builtin help command.
Which can be disabled in the bash port before the next r
On Tue, Jul 6, 1999, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
> RTFM isn't a newby-apparent term. Name it help(1).
That would cause problems with bash users. They already have
a builtin help command.
--
Chris Costello<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On a clear disk you can seek forever.
On Tue, 6 Jul 1999, Chris Costello wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 6, 1999, Doug wrote:
> > I'm confused about this script. How does it differ from 'apropos'?
>
>It differs in that it _uses_ apropos (or 'whatis' if you
> specify the -e flag), as well as a Texinfo search, as well as a
> FAQ search,
On Tue, Jul 6, 1999, Doug wrote:
> I'm confused about this script. How does it differ from 'apropos'?
It differs in that it _uses_ apropos (or 'whatis' if you
specify the -e flag), as well as a Texinfo search, as well as a
FAQ search, using the FAQ pages at http://www.freebsd.org/FAQ/.
I
I'm confused about this script. How does it differ from 'apropos'?
Feeling a little dense,
Doug
--
On account of being a democracy and run by the people, we are the only
nation in the world that has to keep a government four years, no matter
what it does.
-- Will Rogers
I'm confused about this script. How does it differ from 'apropos'?
Feeling a little dense,
Doug
--
On account of being a democracy and run by the people, we are the only
nation in the world that has to keep a government four years, no matter
what it does.
-- Will Rogers
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Zepeda [SMTP:garba...@hooked.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 1999 4:43 AM
> To: Chris Costello
> Cc: hack...@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: 'rtfm' script
>
> P.S. If you're looking for an easy to use regexp i
I've added d...@freebsd.org to the distribution list, for obvious reasons.
On Mon, Jul 05, 1999 at 02:16:36PM -0500, Chris Costello wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 5, 1999, Bill Fumerola wrote:
> > I'm in favor of the rtfm script. It's amazing the positive
> > things that come
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Zepeda [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 1999 4:43 AM
> To: Chris Costello
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: 'rtfm' script
>
> P.S. If you're looking for an easy to use regexp i
I've added [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the distribution list, for obvious reasons.
On Mon, Jul 05, 1999 at 02:16:36PM -0500, Chris Costello wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 5, 1999, Bill Fumerola wrote:
> > I'm in favor of the rtfm script. It's amazing the positive
> > things t
libperl?
Nick
On Mon, 5 Jul 1999, Chris Costello wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 5, 1999, Joe Abley wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 05, 1999 at 05:11:57AM -0500, Chris Costello wrote:
> > >I've been encountering people recently who, for one reason or
> > > another, are unable to find information for themse
libperl?
Nick
On Mon, 5 Jul 1999, Chris Costello wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 5, 1999, Joe Abley wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 05, 1999 at 05:11:57AM -0500, Chris Costello wrote:
> > >I've been encountering people recently who, for one reason or
> > > another, are unable to find information for thems
On Mon, 5 Jul 1999, Alex Zepeda wrote:
> P.S. If you're looking for an easy to use regexp implementation, and
> aren't afraid of C++, check out Qt; if you're looking for more of a
> challenge, there's always the need for an rtsl(1) ;)
rtsl(1) = glimpse(1) :>
- bill fumerola - bi...@chc-chimes.co
On Mon, 5 Jul 1999, Chris Costello wrote:
> > If rtfm(1) is really for newbies and other clueless people, perhaps it
> > should be made interactive. I mean, this whole idea sounds like it's
> > geared towards people who wouldn't know what sections 3, 4, or 9 are.
>
>It'll probably have a lot
On Mon, 5 Jul 1999, Alex Zepeda wrote:
> P.S. If you're looking for an easy to use regexp implementation, and
> aren't afraid of C++, check out Qt; if you're looking for more of a
> challenge, there's always the need for an rtsl(1) ;)
rtsl(1) = glimpse(1) :>
- bill fumerola - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 5 Jul 1999, Chris Costello wrote:
> > If rtfm(1) is really for newbies and other clueless people, perhaps it
> > should be made interactive. I mean, this whole idea sounds like it's
> > geared towards people who wouldn't know what sections 3, 4, or 9 are.
>
>It'll probably have a lo
The updated version (with support for texinfo searching, and
use of fetch(1)) is availible at
http://www.calldei.com/~chris/rtfm.pl
--
Chris Costello
It is now pitch dark. If you proceed, you will likely fall into a pit.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...
I've added texinfo searching and made it use fetch(1) instead
for those behind proxies. Is there any word as to whether this
might be imported into the actual tree or if I should just make
it a port?
--
Chris Costello
Machine independent code isn't.
To Unsubs
On Mon, Jul 5, 1999, Joe Abley wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 05, 1999 at 05:11:57AM -0500, Chris Costello wrote:
> >I've been encountering people recently who, for one reason or
> > another, are unable to find information for themselves when they
> > have a question on FreeBSD.
> >
> >I propose an
On Mon, Jul 05, 1999 at 05:11:57AM -0500, Chris Costello wrote:
>I've been encountering people recently who, for one reason or
> another, are unable to find information for themselves when they
> have a question on FreeBSD.
>
>I propose an rtfm(1) command, and I've got some Perl code that
The updated version (with support for texinfo searching, and
use of fetch(1)) is availible at
http://www.calldei.com/~chris/rtfm.pl
--
Chris Costello<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
It is now pitch dark. If you proceed, you will likely fall into a pit.
To Unsubscribe: se
I've added texinfo searching and made it use fetch(1) instead
for those behind proxies. Is there any word as to whether this
might be imported into the actual tree or if I should just make
it a port?
--
Chris Costello<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Machine independent cod
On Mon, Jul 5, 1999, Joe Abley wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 05, 1999 at 05:11:57AM -0500, Chris Costello wrote:
> >I've been encountering people recently who, for one reason or
> > another, are unable to find information for themselves when they
> > have a question on FreeBSD.
> >
> >I propose an
On Mon, Jul 05, 1999 at 05:11:57AM -0500, Chris Costello wrote:
>I've been encountering people recently who, for one reason or
> another, are unable to find information for themselves when they
> have a question on FreeBSD.
>
>I propose an rtfm(1) command, and I've got some Perl code that
On Mon, Jul 5, 1999, Alex Zepeda wrote:
> >I propose an rtfm(1) command, and I've got some Perl code that
> > works. If people are interested, I will continue with it, and
> > write a man page.
> [...]
> > (-s = simple, don't search sections 3, 4, or 9, and 'e' means
> > 'exact', or 'use whati
>I propose an rtfm(1) command, and I've got some Perl code that
> works. If people are interested, I will continue with it, and
> write a man page.
[...]
> (-s = simple, don't search sections 3, 4, or 9, and 'e' means
> 'exact', or 'use whatis instead of apropos')
If rtfm(1) is really for new
On Mon, Jul 5, 1999, Alex Zepeda wrote:
> >I propose an rtfm(1) command, and I've got some Perl code that
> > works. If people are interested, I will continue with it, and
> > write a man page.
> [...]
> > (-s = simple, don't search sections 3, 4, or 9, and 'e' means
> > 'exact', or 'use what
> At that point the converstaion turned to talking about Irish soap carving
> and the fact that www.OpenBSD.org doesn't run OpenBSD. I guess I was wrong
> about IRC being positive.
Well, you can blame the first bit of surrealism on jkh, the poor fella
has some awful ideas about what the Irish do
>I propose an rtfm(1) command, and I've got some Perl code that
> works. If people are interested, I will continue with it, and
> write a man page.
[...]
> (-s = simple, don't search sections 3, 4, or 9, and 'e' means
> 'exact', or 'use whatis instead of apropos')
If rtfm(1) is really for ne
> At that point the converstaion turned to talking about Irish soap carving
> and the fact that www.OpenBSD.org doesn't run OpenBSD. I guess I was wrong
> about IRC being positive.
Well, you can blame the first bit of surrealism on jkh, the poor fella
has some awful ideas about what the Irish do
On Mon, Jul 5, 1999, Bill Fumerola wrote:
> I'm in favor of the rtfm script. It's amazing the positive
> things that come out of an offhand IRC comment.
>
> [ from http://www.emsphone.com/FreeBSD/log.cgi/19990704.txt ]
>
> [15:33] First it'll search the man
I'm in favor of the rtfm script. It's amazing the positive
things that come out of an offhand IRC comment.
[ from http://www.emsphone.com/FreeBSD/log.cgi/19990704.txt ]
[15:29] tribune: yes, RTFM.
[15:29] we need rtfm(1)
[15:30] rtfm(1) would search the man pages, FAQ, and handbo
On Mon, Jul 5, 1999, Bill Fumerola wrote:
> I'm in favor of the rtfm script. It's amazing the positive
> things that come out of an offhand IRC comment.
>
> [ from http://www.emsphone.com/FreeBSD/log.cgi/19990704.txt ]
>
> [15:33] First it'll search the man
I'm in favor of the rtfm script. It's amazing the positive
things that come out of an offhand IRC comment.
[ from http://www.emsphone.com/FreeBSD/log.cgi/19990704.txt ]
[15:29] tribune: yes, RTFM.
[15:29] we need rtfm(1)
[15:30] rtfm(1) would search the man pages, FAQ, and handbo
I've been encountering people recently who, for one reason or
another, are unable to find information for themselves when they
have a question on FreeBSD.
I propose an rtfm(1) command, and I've got some Perl code that
works. If people are interested, I will continue with it, and
write a man
I've been encountering people recently who, for one reason or
another, are unable to find information for themselves when they
have a question on FreeBSD.
I propose an rtfm(1) command, and I've got some Perl code that
works. If people are interested, I will continue with it, and
write a ma
74 matches
Mail list logo
