Chuck Yerkes passed away last week.
- Forwarded message from David Thiel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: David Thiel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: SFGoth Motorcycle Club <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SFBG] Fw: [ST] memorial (fwd)
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 12:31:44 -0700
Mes
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 02:39:34PM +0100, Martin Blapp wrote:
+> > Nice work, I'm wondering if something will be ever commited:)
+>
+> Of course it will be committed ! But many of us are rather
+> busy, that explains why you don't get instant feedback sometimes.
+>
+> And I really really think th
Hi Pawel,
Thank you very much for your wonderful work !
> Nice work, I'm wondering if something will be ever commited:)
Of course it will be committed ! But many of us are rather
busy, that explains why you don't get instant feedback sometimes.
And I really really think that you need a mentor
On Sat, 05 Feb 2000 15:16:28 PST, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> Ugh, I should have brought this up before the code freeze but...
Before feature freeze, in fact. Fight the madness. :-)
Ciao,
Sheldon.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body o
> Ugh, I should have brought this up before the code freeze but...
I think that pretty much says it all, and reflects my own opinion
on the matter.
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
On Sat, Feb 05, 2000 at 03:16:28PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> Ugh, I should have brought this up before the code freeze but...
>
> Maybe we could make 4.0 the transition point for adding locking
> structures to FILE and DIR structures instead of the hackish
> way it's done now (maintaining
Ugh, I should have brought this up before the code freeze but...
Maybe we could make 4.0 the transition point for adding locking
structures to FILE and DIR structures instead of the hackish
way it's done now (maintaining a seperate structure).
Does anyone agree or have time for this?
It would g
> > > Is there anyway to reverse 32upgrade package after it has been installed
> > > on a 2.2.8-STABLE system. This is on a production box and rebuilding is
> > > not an option I have time to explore.
> >
> > If it's a production system you will have had backups from immediately
> > before yo
On Wed, 3 Nov 1999, Ron 'The InSaNe One' Rosson wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Nov 1999, Mark Newton was heard blurting out:
>
> > If it's a production system you will have had backups from immediately
> > before your upgrade, and reversing the upgrade will be a simple matter
> > of restoring your backups
On Thu, 04 Nov 1999, Mark Newton was heard blurting out:
> Ron 'The InSaNe One' Rosson wrote:
>
> > Is there anyway to reverse 32upgrade package after it has been installed
> > on a 2.2.8-STABLE system. This is on a production box and rebuilding is
> > not an option I have time to explore.
>
Ron 'The InSaNe One' Rosson wrote:
> Is there anyway to reverse 32upgrade package after it has been installed
> on a 2.2.8-STABLE system. This is on a production box and rebuilding is
> not an option I have time to explore.
If it's a production system you will have had backups from immediatel
Is there anyway to reverse 32upgrade package after it has been installed
on a 2.2.8-STABLE system. This is on a production box and rebuilding is
not an option I have time to explore.
--
---
Ron Rosson ... and
On Fri, 27 Aug 1999, Anders Andersson wrote:
> - Forwarded message from Nik Clayton -
>
> Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 21:20:16 +0100
> From: Nik Clayton
> To: Anders Andersson
> Cc: freebsd-...@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: ndc(8)
> Message-ID: <19990826212016.d86...@catkin.nothing-going-on.or
> > 'stats Causes named to dump its statistics to /etc/namedb/named.stats'
> >
> > This also applies for /var/tmp/named_dump.db, that one goes also in
> > /etc/namedb.
>
> Guys, before we fix the manpage on this, could someone please follow
> this up with -hackers? I was under the impression
- Forwarded message from Alexey Zelkin -
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 23:03:07 +0400
From: Alexey Zelkin
To: Anders Andersson
Cc: freebsd-...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ndc(8)
Message-ID: <19990826230307.a1...@scorpion.crimea.ua>
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.7i
hi,
On Thu, Aug 26, 1999 at 01:56:50PM +
- Forwarded message from Nik Clayton -
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 21:20:16 +0100
From: Nik Clayton
To: Anders Andersson
Cc: freebsd-...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ndc(8)
Message-ID: <19990826212016.d86...@catkin.nothing-going-on.org>
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i
Organization: FreeBSD Project http:/
On Fri, 27 Aug 1999, Anders Andersson wrote:
> - Forwarded message from Nik Clayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 21:20:16 +0100
> From: Nik Clayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Anders Andersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: ndc(8)
> Message-I
In message
Julian Elischer writes:
: quickest fix would be to make the core-dump routines not follow symlinks.
An even quicker fix would be to disable coredumps in periodic, since
no reboot would be required. :-)
As has been noted in -security, the kernel fix has been committed.
Warner
To Un
In message <19990826184654.a...@ecad.org> crypt0genic writes:
: This was just posted to BUGTRAQ, are the FreeBSD developers aware of this yet?
Yes. We are and have been working to correct the problem. In fact,
there is a kernel patch that has been committed. A quick and dirty
workaround has bee
> > 'stats Causes named to dump its statistics to /etc/namedb/named.stats'
> >
> > This also applies for /var/tmp/named_dump.db, that one goes also in
> > /etc/namedb.
>
> Guys, before we fix the manpage on this, could someone please follow
> this up with -hackers? I was under the impressio
- Forwarded message from Alexey Zelkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 23:03:07 +0400
From: Alexey Zelkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Anders Andersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ndc(8)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.7i
hi,
On Thu
- Forwarded message from Nik Clayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 21:20:16 +0100
From: Nik Clayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Anders Andersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ndc(8)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i
Organization: Fr
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Julian
Elischer writes:
: quickest fix would be to make the core-dump routines not follow symlinks.
An even quicker fix would be to disable coredumps in periodic, since
no reboot would be required. :-)
As has been noted in -security, the kernel fix has been commit
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> crypt0genic writes:
: This was just posted to BUGTRAQ, are the FreeBSD developers aware of this yet?
Yes. We are and have been working to correct the problem. In fact,
there is a kernel patch that has been committed. A quick and dirty
workaround has been posted t
works as advertised for me...
quickest fix would be to make the core-dump routines not follow symlinks.
On Thu, 26 Aug 1999, crypt0genic wrote:
>
> This was just posted to BUGTRAQ, are the FreeBSD developers aware of this yet?
>
> -Emil
>
> --
> Reverse engineering, the most fun and usuall
This was just posted to BUGTRAQ, are the FreeBSD developers aware of this yet?
-Emil
--
Reverse engineering, the most fun and usually the most effective way
to tackle a problem or learn something new.
Public PGP key: http://www.ecad.org/crypt0genic_pgp_key
Website:http:/
works as advertised for me...
quickest fix would be to make the core-dump routines not follow symlinks.
On Thu, 26 Aug 1999, crypt0genic wrote:
>
> This was just posted to BUGTRAQ, are the FreeBSD developers aware of this yet?
>
> -Emil
>
> --
> Reverse engineering, the most fun and usual
This was just posted to BUGTRAQ, are the FreeBSD developers aware of this yet?
-Emil
--
Reverse engineering, the most fun and usually the most effective way
to tackle a problem or learn something new.
Public PGP key: http://www.ecad.org/crypt0genic_pgp_key
Website:http:
On Mon, Jul 12, 1999 at 01:22:49PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
< talking about the recent paper on using KLDs to replace FreeBSD syscalls >
> I would suggest that a version of this document be incorporated into our
> docs.
I've already e-mailed the people concerned to ask. I'll let you know w
On Mon, Jul 12, 1999 at 01:22:49PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
< talking about the recent paper on using KLDs to replace FreeBSD syscalls >
> I would suggest that a version of this document be incorporated into our
> docs.
I've already e-mailed the people concerned to ask. I'll let you know
On Tue, 13 Jul 1999, Greg Lehey wrote:
> In fact, the most interesting thing about this (rather large) document
> is that it's the best documentation I've seen on klds. I don't know
> why anybody would want to use it for compromising security, since it's
> a *lot* of work, and to even get as far
On Tue, 13 Jul 1999, Greg Lehey wrote:
> In fact, the most interesting thing about this (rather large) document
> is that it's the best documentation I've seen on klds. I don't know
> why anybody would want to use it for compromising security, since it's
> a *lot* of work, and to even get as far
People, how much attention are you going to get to this topic with a
subject line like "(forw)"?
On Monday, 12 July 1999 at 12:28:03 +, crypt0genic wrote:
>
> Have you all seen this?
> To: bugt...@securityfocus.com
>
> Hi folks,
>
> THC released a new article de
People, how much attention are you going to get to this topic with a
subject line like "(forw)"?
On Monday, 12 July 1999 at 12:28:03 +, crypt0genic wrote:
>
> Have you all seen this?
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hi folks,
>
> THC released a new article de
On Mon, 12 Jul 1999, Doug Rabson wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jul 1999, Karl Pielorz wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Mark Newton wrote:
> > >
> > > Karl Pielorz wrote:
> > >
> > > > Yes, a nice, effective - and simply way of replacing syscall's on
> > > FreeBSD...
> > > > Some might say a little too 'simple'
I would suggest that a version of this document be incorporated into our
docs.
It's not like it says anythign new, but it's a really good introduction
to KLD modules and maybe it's be better to have those documents around to
remind people how easy it is to hack a system once root is broken.
julia
On Mon, 12 Jul 1999, Karl Pielorz wrote:
>
>
> Mark Newton wrote:
> >
> > Karl Pielorz wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, a nice, effective - and simply way of replacing syscall's on
> > FreeBSD...
> > > Some might say a little too 'simple'?
> >
> > Garbage. You can do this on any OS, whether it suppo
On Mon, 12 Jul 1999, Doug Rabson wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jul 1999, Karl Pielorz wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Mark Newton wrote:
> > >
> > > Karl Pielorz wrote:
> > >
> > > > Yes, a nice, effective - and simply way of replacing syscall's on FreeBSD...
> > > > Some might say a little too 'simple'?
> >
I would suggest that a version of this document be incorporated into our
docs.
It's not like it says anythign new, but it's a really good introduction
to KLD modules and maybe it's be better to have those documents around to
remind people how easy it is to hack a system once root is broken.
juli
On Mon, 12 Jul 1999, Karl Pielorz wrote:
>
>
> Mark Newton wrote:
> >
> > Karl Pielorz wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, a nice, effective - and simply way of replacing syscall's on FreeBSD...
> > > Some might say a little too 'simple'?
> >
> > Garbage. You can do this on any OS, whether it supports
Mark Newton wrote:
>
> Karl Pielorz wrote:
>
> > Yes, a nice, effective - and simply way of replacing syscall's on
> FreeBSD...
> > Some might say a little too 'simple'?
>
> Garbage. You can do this on any OS, whether it supports loadable
> modules or not, if you've managed to win sufficie
Mark Newton wrote:
>
> Karl Pielorz wrote:
>
> > Yes, a nice, effective - and simply way of replacing syscall's on FreeBSD...
> > Some might say a little too 'simple'?
>
> Garbage. You can do this on any OS, whether it supports loadable
> modules or not, if you've managed to win sufficient
Karl Pielorz wrote:
> Yes, a nice, effective - and simply way of replacing syscall's on FreeBSD...
> Some might say a little too 'simple'?
Garbage. You can do this on any OS, whether it supports loadable
modules or not, if you've managed to win sufficient privileges through
some other means.
Yes, a nice, effective - and simply way of replacing syscall's on FreeBSD...
Some might say a little too 'simple'?
-Kp
crypt0genic wrote:
>
> Have you all seen this?
>
> From: Anonymous
> To: bugt...@securityfocus.com
>
> Hi folks,
>
> THC released a new article dealing with FreeBSD 3.x
> Ker
Have you all seen this?
--
Reverse engineering, the most phun and usually the most effective way to tackle
a problem or learn something new.
Public PGP key: http://www.ecad.org/crypt0genic_pgp_key
Website:http://www.ecad.org/
--- Begin Message ---
Hi folks,
THC release
Karl Pielorz wrote:
> Yes, a nice, effective - and simply way of replacing syscall's on FreeBSD...
> Some might say a little too 'simple'?
Garbage. You can do this on any OS, whether it supports loadable
modules or not, if you've managed to win sufficient privileges through
some other means.
Yes, a nice, effective - and simply way of replacing syscall's on FreeBSD...
Some might say a little too 'simple'?
-Kp
crypt0genic wrote:
>
> Have you all seen this?
>
> From: Anonymous <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hi folks,
>
> THC released a new article dealing with FreeB
Have you all seen this?
--
Reverse engineering, the most phun and usually the most effective way to tackle a
problem or learn something new.
Public PGP key: http://www.ecad.org/crypt0genic_pgp_key
Website:http://www.ecad.org/
Hi folks,
THC released a new article de
On Wed, 03 Nov 1999, Ron 'The InSaNe One' Rosson was heard blurting out:
>
> Is there anyway to reverse 32upgrade package after it has been installed
> on a 2.2.8-STABLE system. This is on a production box and rebuilding is
> not an option I have time to explore.
>
>
Here is what I am getting
49 matches
Mail list logo
