san...@sanpei.org (MIHIRA Yoshiro) writes:
> # Yes, We modify some ports to support start,stop.
And others to no longer support it. The Apache 1.2 port used to
support it, the Apache 1.3 port doesn't. Here's a replacement:
#!/bin/sh
if [ ! -x /usr/local/sbin/apachectl ] ; then
echo "
On Tue, Jun 15, 1999 at 08:59:59AM -0700, Arun Sharma wrote:
> While we're on the init topic, is there any strong feeling here about
> BSD /etc/rc* scripts Vs SysV ?
Yes, lots. The last round of discussion was covered in the freebsd-arch
mailing list, the archives should be enlightening.
N
--
pgpnad5Bmmg3c.pgp
Description: signed PGP message
adsha...@home.com wrote:
>>
>> Like sending a signal to the process providing the service ? The
>> problem with that approach is, the signal you send and the clean up
>> you do is non-standard for each service and having a standard
>> interface:
>>
>> /etc/rc.d/ stop|start|restart
>>
>> makes it
Wayne Cuddy wrote:
> They SysV way is more elegant and less error prone for bad typist.
... and has absolutely no way of encoding interdependencies between
services (or any concept of a "service" at all, other than as
after-the-fact hacks). What happens to your NFS services when
you do "/etc/
On 15 Jun 1999, Arun Sharma wrote:
> Date: 15 Jun 1999 19:54:51 -0700
> From: Arun Sharma
> To: Mark Newton
> Cc: hack...@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: [Call for review] init(8): new feature
>
> Mark Newton writes:
>
> > Arun Sharma wrote:
> >
> > >
Arun Sharma wrote:
> Mark Newton writes:
> > Arun Sharma wrote:
> >
> > > While we're on the init topic, is there any strong feeling here about
> > > BSD /etc/rc* scripts Vs SysV ? The nice thing about SysV initscripts
> > > is the ability to start and stop any service that I like.
> >
Mark Newton writes:
> Arun Sharma wrote:
>
> > While we're on the init topic, is there any strong feeling here about
> > BSD /etc/rc* scripts Vs SysV ? The nice thing about SysV initscripts
> > is the ability to start and stop any service that I like.
>
> That's fine -- there are lots of way
Arun Sharma wrote:
> While we're on the init topic, is there any strong feeling here about
> BSD /etc/rc* scripts Vs SysV ? The nice thing about SysV initscripts
> is the ability to start and stop any service that I like.
That's fine -- there are lots of ways to start and stop any service you
On Tue, Jun 15, 1999 at 07:51:54AM -0400, Bill Fumerola wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jun 1999, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>
> > While the -core is busy to review/approve this patch,
> > I would like to know your opinion. What do you think
> > of it?
>
> The sysv init should probably be off by default.
>
Sure
On Tue, 15 Jun 1999, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> While the -core is busy to review/approve this patch,
> I would like to know your opinion. What do you think
> of it?
The sysv init should probably be off by default.
- bill fumerola - bi...@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp -
- ph:(80
While we're on the init topic, is there any strong feeling here about
BSD /etc/rc* scripts Vs SysV ? The nice thing about SysV initscripts
is the ability to start and stop any service that I like.
-Arun
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers
Hi, hackers!
While the -core is busy to review/approve this patch,
I would like to know your opinion. What do you think
of it?
Thanks,
--
Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA of the
r...@ucb.crimea.ua United Commercial Bank,
r...@freebsd.orgFreeBSD committer,
+380.652.
13 matches
Mail list logo
