Re: [PATCH] add '-' glibc extension to strftime(3)

Hi, Peter, On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 05:43:53PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > It turns out that the GNU extension '-' in their strftime(3) implementation > > is somewhat popular in several applications. The patch in the last part of > > this e-mail will add a simulate implementation for it. > [

Re: [PATCH] add '-' glibc extension to strftime(3)

On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 05:43:53PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: > On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 01:23:02AM +0800, Xin LI wrote: > > Hi, folks, > > > > It turns out that the GNU extension '-' in their strftime(3) implementation > > is somewhat popular in several applications. The patch in the last part

Re: [PATCH] add '-' glibc extension to strftime(3)

On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 01:23:02AM +0800, Xin LI wrote: > Hi, folks, > > It turns out that the GNU extension '-' in their strftime(3) implementation > is somewhat popular in several applications. The patch in the last part of > this e-mail will add a simulate implementation for it. Thanks for ta

[PATCH] add '-' glibc extension to strftime(3)

Hi, folks, It turns out that the GNU extension '-' in their strftime(3) implementation is somewhat popular in several applications. The patch in the last part of this e-mail will add a simulate implementation for it. My question is: (1) Am I doing things cleanly and correctly? I have att