After all the preparatory changes are committed, this is a final[*]
notice/warning that I am going to start committing the following patchset really
soon now[**[:
http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/zfsboot.patches.9.diff
[*] unless circumstances change
[**] maybe next hour, even
--
Andriy Gapon
Here is a subversion diff to make use of the new bootargs.h header in pc98
cdboot and loader, and i386 cdboot and pxeldr:
http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/bootargs.diff
Could you please review it?
Thank you!
MFi386 of BTX changes for support of KARGS_FLAGS_EXTARG is pending.
Do you think that it
On 5/9/12 5:32 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Here is a subversion diff to make use of the new bootargs.h header in pc98
cdboot and loader, and i386 cdboot and pxeldr:
http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/bootargs.diff
Could you please review it?
Thank you!
Looks good.
MFi386 of BTX changes for
on 07/05/2012 20:43 John Baldwin said the following:
On Monday, May 07, 2012 10:47:05 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 07/05/2012 16:53 John Baldwin said the following:
[snip]
What do you think about the -LOCORE- change that Bruce inspired?
In general I think this looks good. I have only one
On 5/8/12 3:14 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 07/05/2012 20:43 John Baldwin said the following:
On Monday, May 07, 2012 10:47:05 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 07/05/2012 16:53 John Baldwin said the following:
[snip]
What do you think about the -LOCORE- change that Bruce inspired?
In general I think
on 08/05/2012 17:15 John Baldwin said the following:
Bruce might even suggest adding a ba_ prefix to all the members of
struct bootargs btw. I would not be opposed, but you've already done
a fair bit of work on this patch.
Thank you for sparing me :-)
So I hope to get busy committing this
On Saturday, May 05, 2012 5:53:07 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 05/05/2012 12:31 Andriy Gapon said the following:
on 04/05/2012 18:25 John Baldwin said the following:
On Thursday, May 03, 2012 11:23:51 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 03/05/2012 18:02 Andriy Gapon said the following:
Here's the
on 05/05/2012 13:49 Bruce Evans said the following:
On Sat, 5 May 2012, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 04/05/2012 18:25 John Baldwin said the following:
On Thursday, May 03, 2012 11:23:51 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 03/05/2012 18:02 Andriy Gapon said the following:
Here's the latest version of the
on 07/05/2012 16:53 John Baldwin said the following:
On Saturday, May 05, 2012 5:53:07 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
[snip]
The new patchset: http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/zfsboot.patches.7.diff
Looks great, thanks! A few replies below:
Here's a followup patch for the suggestions:
on 07/05/2012 17:47 Andriy Gapon said the following:
on 07/05/2012 16:53 John Baldwin said the following:
Ok. Maybe add one comment to the bootargs.h head to explain that the
'bootargs'
struct starts at ARGOFF and can grow up, while struct bootinfo is copied
such that
it's end is at the
On Monday, May 07, 2012 10:47:05 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 07/05/2012 16:53 John Baldwin said the following:
On Saturday, May 05, 2012 5:53:07 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
[snip]
The new patchset: http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/zfsboot.patches.7.diff
Looks great, thanks! A few replies below:
On Monday, May 07, 2012 11:15:53 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 07/05/2012 17:47 Andriy Gapon said the following:
on 07/05/2012 16:53 John Baldwin said the following:
Ok. Maybe add one comment to the bootargs.h head to explain that the
'bootargs'
struct starts at ARGOFF and can grow up,
on 04/05/2012 18:25 John Baldwin said the following:
On Thursday, May 03, 2012 11:23:51 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 03/05/2012 18:02 Andriy Gapon said the following:
Here's the latest version of the patches:
http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/zfsboot.patches.4.diff
I've found a couple of problems
on 05/05/2012 12:31 Andriy Gapon said the following:
on 04/05/2012 18:25 John Baldwin said the following:
On Thursday, May 03, 2012 11:23:51 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 03/05/2012 18:02 Andriy Gapon said the following:
Here's the latest version of the patches:
On Sat, 5 May 2012, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 04/05/2012 18:25 John Baldwin said the following:
On Thursday, May 03, 2012 11:23:51 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 03/05/2012 18:02 Andriy Gapon said the following:
Here's the latest version of the patches:
On Thursday, May 03, 2012 11:23:51 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 03/05/2012 18:02 Andriy Gapon said the following:
Here's the latest version of the patches:
http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/zfsboot.patches.4.diff
I've found a couple of problems in the previous version, so here's another
Here's the latest version of the patches:
http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/zfsboot.patches.4.diff
John,
the first of the patches implements the approach that we previously discussed.
All arguments are passed starting at a fixed offset that should provide enough
space for extending argument list.
on 03/05/2012 18:02 Andriy Gapon said the following:
Here's the latest version of the patches:
http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/zfsboot.patches.4.diff
I've found a couple of problems in the previous version, so here's another one:
http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/zfsboot.patches.5.diff
The
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:04:17AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 29/04/2012 19:46 Marius Strobl said the following:
Given that you certainly have a well better knowledge of ZFS, it
would be great if we could do it the other way around, i.e. commit
the sparc64 support first and then your
on 29/04/2012 19:46 Marius Strobl said the following:
Given that you certainly have a well better knowledge of ZFS, it
would be great if we could do it the other way around, i.e. commit
the sparc64 support first and then your patch after adapting
whatever you have in mind with things becoming
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 12:06:08PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 23/04/2012 00:21 Marius Strobl said the following:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 06:37:54PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
[snip]
I am particularly interested in reviews of my attempt to make ZFS boot
support
arch-independent. The
on 23/04/2012 00:21 Marius Strobl said the following:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 06:37:54PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
[snip]
I am particularly interested in reviews of my attempt to make ZFS boot
support
arch-independent. The arches, of course, would have to add some code to make
use of that
on 23/04/2012 09:23 Andrey V. Elsukov said the following:
On 23.04.2012 1:21, Marius Strobl wrote:
I can't say much about these patches as a whole as they are rather big
and I'm not aware of all the details of ZFS. However, one bit that makes
the current implementation x86-specific is
On 27.04.2012 13:14, Andriy Gapon wrote:
I also have some WIP related to moving partition table handling into MD
Oh, i did mean MI part.
part. You can look here: http://people.freebsd.org/~ae/sys_boot.diff
I like this patch. OTOH, I couldn't help by wonder if it is possible to
somehow
on 27/04/2012 13:37 Andrey V. Elsukov said the following:
What you think about this concept:
We can implement some MI API to query disks count and each disk parameters
(mediasize,
sectorsize). This MI code will use some IOCTL that will act with MD disk's
devsw-ioctl.
devicename.c
On 23.04.2012 1:21, Marius Strobl wrote:
I can't say much about these patches as a whole as they are rather
big and I'm not aware of all the details of ZFS. However, one bit that
makes the current implementation x86-specific is zfs_dev_init(). If
you could move it to the MD part in the course
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 06:37:54PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
I would like to ask for a review and/or testing of the following three
patches:
http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/zfsboot.patches.diff
These patches add support for booting from an arbitrary filesystem of any
detected ZFS pool.
on 17/04/2012 23:43 John Baldwin said the following:
On Tuesday, April 17, 2012 4:22:19 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
We already have a flag for ZFS (KARGS_FLAGS_ZFS, 0x4). So the new flag
could be
named something ZFS-specific (as silly as KARGS_FLAGS_ZFS2) or something more
general such as
on 14/04/2012 18:37 Andriy Gapon said the following:
I would like to ask for a review and/or testing of the following three
patches:
http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/zfsboot.patches.diff
I've put a new version of the patch here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/zfsboot.patches.2.diff
Most
on 15/04/2012 04:01 Bob Friesenhahn said the following:
It would be nice if the updated FreeBSD bootloader could have the ability to
boot both Solaris and FreeBSD root filesystems in the same pool so that one
could switch between several zfs-based operating systems without needing to
use
a
On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 2:02:22 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 17/04/2012 23:43 John Baldwin said the following:
On Tuesday, April 17, 2012 4:22:19 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
We already have a flag for ZFS (KARGS_FLAGS_ZFS, 0x4). So the new flag
could be
named something ZFS-specific (as
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 09:41 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 2:02:22 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 17/04/2012 23:43 John Baldwin said the following:
On Tuesday, April 17, 2012 4:22:19 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
We already have a flag for ZFS (KARGS_FLAGS_ZFS, 0x4). So the
on 18/04/2012 17:22 Ian Lepore said the following:
YES! A size field (preferably as the first field in the struct) along
with a flag to indicate that it's a new-style boot info struct that
starts with a size field, will allow future changes without a lot of
drama. It can allow code that has
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 17:36 +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 18/04/2012 17:22 Ian Lepore said the following:
YES! A size field (preferably as the first field in the struct) along
with a flag to indicate that it's a new-style boot info struct that
starts with a size field, will allow future
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 17:36 +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 18/04/2012 17:22 Ian Lepore said the following:
YES! A size field (preferably as the first field in the struct) along
with a flag to indicate that it's a new-style boot info struct that
starts with a size field, will allow future
on 18/04/2012 17:40 Ian Lepore said the following:
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 17:36 +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 18/04/2012 17:22 Ian Lepore said the following:
YES! A size field (preferably as the first field in the struct) along
with a flag to indicate that it's a new-style boot info struct
On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 11:00:18 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 18/04/2012 17:40 Ian Lepore said the following:
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 17:36 +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 18/04/2012 17:22 Ian Lepore said the following:
YES! A size field (preferably as the first field in the struct) along
on 16/04/2012 16:56 John Baldwin said the following:
On Saturday, April 14, 2012 1:35:35 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 14/04/2012 18:37 Andriy Gapon said the following:
I would like to ask for a review and/or testing of the following three
patches:
On Tuesday, April 17, 2012 4:22:19 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 16/04/2012 16:56 John Baldwin said the following:
On Saturday, April 14, 2012 1:35:35 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 14/04/2012 18:37 Andriy Gapon said the following:
I would like to ask for a review and/or testing of the following
On Saturday, April 14, 2012 1:35:35 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 14/04/2012 18:37 Andriy Gapon said the following:
I would like to ask for a review and/or testing of the following three
patches:
http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/zfsboot.patches.diff
These patches add support for booting
I would like to ask for a review and/or testing of the following three patches:
http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/zfsboot.patches.diff
These patches add support for booting from an arbitrary filesystem of any
detected ZFS pool. A filesystem could be selected in zfsboot and thus will
affectfrom
on 14/04/2012 18:37 Andriy Gapon said the following:
I would like to ask for a review and/or testing of the following three
patches:
http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/zfsboot.patches.diff
These patches add support for booting from an arbitrary filesystem of any
detected ZFS pool. A
It would be nice if the updated FreeBSD bootloader could have the
ability to boot both Solaris and FreeBSD root filesystems in the same
pool so that one could switch between several zfs-based operating
systems without needing to use a different partition for each one.
Is this within the bounds
On Apr 14, 2012, at 6:01 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
It would be nice if the updated FreeBSD bootloader could have the ability to
boot both Solaris and FreeBSD root filesystems in the same pool so that one
could switch between several zfs-based operating systems without needing to
use a
44 matches
Mail list logo
