On Tue, 23.10.2007 at 15:47:40 -1000, Clifton Royston wrote:
> I got a request to summarize my results to the list, so here's a
> quick write-up. Based on my preliminary testing last week, pkg_replace
> looks like the right tool for package-based server maintenance.
Interesting, as I'm facing t
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 01:19:17PM -1000, Clifton Royston wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 04:05:20PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > I used to use pkg_update from the 'pkg_install-devel' toolset to
> > > upgrade systems via replacement of binary packages. ...
> > > Is there any better
> I used to use pkg_update from the 'pkg_install-devel' toolset to
> upgrade systems via replacement of binary packages. Its
> implementation had some minor flaws - it was essentially a perl
> wrapper for an iterative "pkg_delete -f" followed by "pkg_add -f",
> which made it problematic to upgr
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 04:05:20PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I used to use pkg_update from the 'pkg_install-devel' toolset to
> > upgrade systems via replacement of binary packages. Its
> > implementation had some minor flaws - it was essentially a perl
> > wrapper for an iterative
I used to use pkg_update from the 'pkg_install-devel' toolset to
upgrade systems via replacement of binary packages. Its implementation
had some minor flaws - it was essentially a perl wrapper for an
iterative "pkg_delete -f" followed by "pkg_add -f", which made it
problematic to upgrade either
5 matches
Mail list logo